Rhodopsin gene conserved regions in a viral vector enhance expression

ABSTRACT

The invention relates to gene suppression and replacement. In particular, the invention relates to enhanced expression of suppression agents for suppressing gene expression in a cell and in vivo and replacement nucleic acids that are not inhibited by the suppression agent. Regulatory elements are included in expression vectors to optimize expression of the suppression agent and/or replacement nucleic acid.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation application under 35 U.S.C. §120 of a currently pending U.S. application Ser. No. 12/595,080 filed on Mar. 3, 2012 which is a 371 National Phase Entry Application of International Application No. PCT/GB2008/001310 filed Apr. 14, 2008, which designated the U.S., and which claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) of U.S. Provisional No. 60/923,067 filed Apr. 12, 2007, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.

SEQUENCE LISTING

The instant application contains a Sequence Listing which has been submitted in ASCII format via EFS-Web and is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Said ASCII copy, created on Mar. 3, 2010, is named 20100303_ReplacementSequenceListing_TextFile_(—)740789_(—)066400_US.txt and is 127,586 bytes in size.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates to mutation independent suppression and replacement of disease-causing mutant genes.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Many mutation-based diseases are more genetically diverse than can be predicted from clinical presentation. Some mutation-based diseases are Mendelian and involve the inheritance of a single mutant gene, others are polygenic or multifactorial and involve multiple genetic insults. In the case of some Mendelian disorders, many different mutations within the same gene can give rise to, or can predispose an individual to, a disease. Similarly, for some multifactorial disorders, many different mutations within one or more genes can predispose an individual to a disease or can act in an additive manner with other genetic and environmental influences to give rise to a disease. This mutational heterogeneity underlying the molecular etiologies of many diseases represents a significant barrier to the development of therapies for such diseases. Moreover, genetic strategies for suppressing and replacing a mutant protein face many challenges with regard to the effectiveness of the machinery used to deliver and regulate the expression of the suppressor and replacement nucleic acids in vivo. Therefore, a need exists for effective mutation-independent therapeutics that achieve effective suppression and replacement.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates to gene suppression and replacement. In particular, the invention relates to enhanced expression of suppression agents for suppressing gene expression in a cell and in vivo and of replacement nucleic acids that are not inhibited and/or are partially inhibited by the suppression agent. Expression vectors used to express the suppression agent(s) and replacement nucleic acids comprise regulatory elements to optimize expression of the suppression agent(s) and or replacement nucleic acids.

The invention embodies use of replacement genes using sequences to enhance expression of replacement genes from viral and or non-viral vectors. In a further aspect the invection relates to enhanced expression of suppression agent(s) and or replacement genes from viral or and non-viral vectors. In a further embodiment the invention relates to enhanced expression of suppression agent(s) and or replacement genes and or genes encoding neurotrophic factors from viral and or non-viral vectors.

In one aspect the invention relates to use of conserved sequences from retinal genes to enhance expression of suppression agent(s) and or replacement genes and or genes encoding neurotrophic factors. The use of such conserved sequences has been found to result in surprisingly efficient expression. In a particular aspect the invention relates to use of conserved sequences from retinal genes to enhance expression of suppression agent(s) and or replacement genes and or genes encoding neurotrophic factors from adeno associated virus (AAV) vectors. In another aspect the invention provides vectors for expression of suppression agent(s) and or replacement gene(s) and or genes encoding neurotrophic factors using regulatory sequences from retinal gene(s) and or non-retinal gene(s) and or ubiquitously expressing genes to enhance expression from vectors.

In one aspect, the invention provides vectors for expressing a suppression agent for a disease causing gene and/or a replacement nucleic acid that is not recognized or is partially recognized by the suppression agent.

In an embodiment, the vector comprises an enhancer sequence, such as, for example, a sequence of SEQ ID NOs: 402-413 or functional variants or equivalents thereof. In another embodiment, the vector comprises at least one regulatory element selected from the group consisting of a promoter, a stuffer, an insulator, a silencer, an intron sequence, a post translational regulatory element, a polyadenylation site, and a transcription factor binding site.

In another embodiment, the vector comprises at least one of conserved regions A through I from the rhodopsin gene, as represented by SEQ ID NOs: 92-99, or functional variant or equivalent thereof. In another embodiment, the vector comprises at least one transcription factor binding site sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 100-401, or functional variant or equivalent thereof.

The suppression agent may be a nucleic acid, protein, amino acid(s), antibody, aptamer, or any such agent that can bind to and inhibit a DNA, RNA, or protein. In an embodiment, the suppression agent is a siRNA selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25, 27, 29, 31, 33, 35-67, 75, 77, 79, 81, 83, 85, and 414-421 or functional variant or equivalent thereof.

The replacement nucleic acid is not recognized or is recognized partially by the suppression effector, because its sequence has been altered such that it cannot bind or binds less efficiently to the suppression agent but still encodes a normal or enhanced gene product. In an embodiment, the replacement nucleic acid is a siRNA selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 68, 76, 78, 80, 82, 84, and 86, or functional variant or equivalent thereof.

In an embodiment, the invention provides vectors, such as viral vectors, that comprise a suppression agent and/or a replacement nucleic acid. For example, the vector comprises at least one suppression agent nucleotide sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25, 27, 29, 31, 33, 35-67, 75, 77, 79, 81, 83, and 85, or functional variant or equivalent thereof, and at least one replacement nucleic acid nucleotide sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 68, 76, 78, 80, 82, 84, and 86, or functional variant or equivalent thereof.

In another aspect, the invention provides therapeutic compositions comprising at least one vector comprising at least one suppression agent nucleotide sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25, 27, 29, 31, 33, 35-67, 75, 77, 79, 81, 83, 85 and 414-421 or functional variant or equivalent thereof, and at least one replacement nucleic acid nucleotide sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 68, 76, 78, 80, 82, 84, and 86, or functional variant or equivalent thereof. In an embodiment, the vector of the therapeutic composition further comprises a regulatory element selected from the group consisting of an enhancer, a promoter, a stuffer, an insulator, a silencer, an antirepressor, an intron sequence, a post translational regulatory element, a polyadenylation signal (e.g. minimal poly A), a conserved region A through I, and a transcription factor binding site.

In another aspect the invention provides suppression and replacement in conjunction with provision of a gene encoding a neurotrophic/neuroprotective factor(s).

In another aspect, the invention provides cells comprising the nucleic acids and vectors of the invention.

In another aspect, the invention provides transgenic animals comprising the nucleic acids and vectors of the invention.

In yet another aspect, the invention provides methods of suppressing the expression of a mutant gene and replacing expression of the mutant gene with a replacement nucleic acid, the method comprising administering to a mammal a therapeutic composition of the invention.

In yet another aspect, the invention provides methods of suppressing the expression of a mutant gene and replacing expression of the mutant gene with a replacement nucleic acid in conjunction with a gene encoding a neurotrophic/neuropeotective factor(s), the method comprising administering to a mammal a therapeutic composition of the invention.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The foregoing and other objects, features and advantages of the present invention, as well as the invention itself, will be more fully understood from the following description of preferred embodiments when read together with the accompanying drawings, in which:

FIG. 1 illustrates RHO suppression and replacement constructs. FIG. 1A is a diagrammatic representation of a RHO suppressor-EGFP construct shBB-EGFP (shQ1-EGFP and shNT-EGFP have the same format). shRNAs were expressed from the H1 promoter and EGFP from the CMV immediate early promoter. The SV40 polyadenylation signal was located at the 3′ end of the EGFP gene. FIG. 1B illustrates a two component suppression and replacement construct shBB-rBB (shQ1-rQ1 and shNT-rBB have the same format). Suppressors were expressed from the H1 promoter and replacement RHO cDNAs from a 1.7 kb mouse rhodopsin promoter (rhoP). Polyadenylation signals of the RHO gene were included in the 1829 bp fragment. HGH int: human growth hormone intron. For tissue culture and retinal explant experiments these constructs were maintained in pEGFP-1 (A) or a CMV-promoterless derivative of pcDNA-3.1- (B) and for in vivo experiments in the AAV vector. Restriction enzyme sites used for cloning are indicated. Promoters were separated by spacer DNA fragments. Numbers indicate molecular sizes (bp) and arrows indicate direction of transcription.

FIG. 2 illustrates RHO suppression in HeLa cells. HeLa cells were transiently co-transfected three times in triplicate with wild type RHO and RHO-targeting siRNAs (siB, siBB, siC, siCC, siQ1 or siQ2) or control siRNAs (siEGFP or siNT). Following transfection, RHO mRNA and protein levels were evaluated by real time RT-PCR (A), ELISA (A) and Alexa Fluor 568-labeled immunocytochemistry (B). Cell nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. Error bars represent SD values.

FIG. 3 illustrates replacement of RHO expression in conjunction with suppression in HeLa cells. Replacement RHO sequences were generated with altered degenerate nucleotides at siRNA target sites. HeLa cells were transiently co-transfected three times in triplicate with a replacement RHO expression vector (rBB, rCC or rQ1) and a RHO-targeting siRNA (siBB, siCC or siQ1) or a non-targeting siRNA (siNT). Replacement RHO mRNA levels were evaluated by real time RT-PCR. Error bars represent SD values.

FIG. 4 illustrates RHO suppression in retinal explants. Mouse retinas (n=6), dissected from newborn NHR+/− rho−/− pups (transgenic mice expressing a human rhodopsin transgene NHR on a mouse rhodopsin knockout background rho−/−), were electroporated with a construct co-expressing a shRNA targeting RHO or a non-targeting shRNA and EGFP (shBB-EGFP, shQ1-EGFP or shNT-EGFP). Negative control explants were not electroporated. Two week organotypic cultures were dissociated with trypsin and FACS analysed. Red and blue dots (right and left populations respectively in each of A1 and A2) represent gated and ungated populations of dissociated explants. Scatterplots of forward- (FSC) versus side-scatter (SSC) and histograms of EGFP fluorescence of the gated population of non-electroporated (A1 and A2, EGFP-negative) and electroporated (A3 and A4, EGFP-positive) retinas are given. The bar chart indicates RHO mRNA levels in retinal explant cells expressing sNT-EGFP, sBB-EGFP and sQ1-EGFP, quantified by real time RT-PCR. Error bars represent SD values.

FIG. 5 illustrates RHO suppression in photoreceptor cells in vivo. Adult transgenic NHR+/− rho−/− mice were subretinally injected with 3 μl 2×10¹² vp/ml AAV co-expressing a RHO-targeting or non-targeting shRNA and EGFP (AAV-shBB-EGFP or AAV-shNT-EGFP). Retinas were analysed two weeks post-injection. Expression of the 21 nucleotide (nt) shRNA BB, detected by RNase protection in two transduced retinas, is depicted in lanes L1 and L2 (A). RHO RNA probes were labelled with P³²-γATP and protected RNA separated on 15% denaturing acrylamide gels (A). M: size marker indicates 10, 20 and 30 nt. Bars represent RHO mRNA levels in FACS sorted cells from dissociated retinas (n=6) transduced with either AAV-shBB-EGFP or AAV-shNT-EGFP (B). Suppression levels were determined by real time RT-PCR. Error bars represent SD values. Rhodopsin immunocytochemistry (Cy3-labeled) and EGFP protein expression in cells from dissociated retinas, transduced with either AAV-shBB-EGFP (arrows) or AAV-shNT-EGFP (arrow heads), are depicted (C). Cell nuclei were counterstained with DAPI.

FIG. 6A-D illustrates retinal histology and ERG analysis of RHO-M mouse. Two month old rho+/+(wild type), rho+/−, NHR+/− rho−/− and RHO-M+/− rho−/− mice were analysed by retinal histology and ERG (n=8). A, B and C: rhodopsin immunocytochemistry (Cy3) showing similar rod outer segment (ROS) labelling in rho+/+, NHR+/− rho−/− and RHO-M+/− rho−/− retinas respectively. Nuclear layers were stained with DAPI. D: representative rod-isolated ERG responses. ONL: outer nuclear layer. INL: inner nuclear layer. GCL: ganglion cell layer.

FIG. 6E illustrates RNAi-mediated suppression of human rhodopsin in RHO-M mice. RHO-M mice were subretinally injected with AAV2/5 vectors carrying an shRNA-based suppressor and an EGFP reporter gene. Mice were sacrificed 14 days post-injection, retinas taken and retinal cells dissociated as in Palfi et al. 2006. RNAi-mediated suppression was evaluated using real-time RT-PCR assays. Retinal cells transduced with AAV-shBB-EGFP, AAV-shCC-EGFP and AAV-shQ1-EGFP vs AAV-shNT-EGFP were FACS sorted from adult RhoM mouse retinas, 14 days post subretinal injection. Of note is that AAV-shCC-EGFP suppresses RHO less in RHO-M mice due to the presence of a 2 bp mismatch in the human rhodopsin transgenic in RHO-M animals. Levels of rhodopsin expression were shCC: 59.73%; shBB: 8.77%; shQ1: 20.6% when compared to the non-targeting control shNT which was set at 100% expression.

FIG. 6F illustrates depression of the ERG response in RHO-M eyes that have received AAV-shBB-EGFP or AAV-shQ1-EGFP when compared to eyes subretinally injected with AAV-shNT-EGFP. The top tracing in each panel represents the right eye which received the targeting AAV-shRNA vector and the bottom tracing in each panel represents the left eye which received the control non-targeting AAV-shNT vector. In contrast no reduction/depression of the ERG was observed in RHO-M mice subretinally injected with AAV-shCC-EGFP vector.

FIG. 7 illustrates the expression of replacement RHO in vivo. Ten day old rho−/− mice were subretinally injected with a 1:1 mixture of 2 μl 12×10¹² vp/ml of two AAV vectors, AAV-EGFP (also termed AAV-CMV-EGFP) and AAV-shBB-rBB (also termed AAV-BB8). Rhodopsin, EGFP protein and nuclei were detected by Cy3-labeled immunocytochemistry, native fluorescence and nuclear DAPI staining respectively. Low magnification images show a cross section of a whole injected eye with arrowheads indicating the transduced area (A and B). High magnification laser scanning micrographs show transduced (C and D) and non-transduced (E and F) areas. INL: inner nuclear layer. GCL: ganglion cell layer. ROS: rod outer segments. ONL: outer nuclear layer. FIG. 7 provides evidence of rhodopsin protein expression from replacement genes in retinal sections obtained from rho−/− mice subretinally injected with AAV2/5 suppression and replacement vectors.

FIG. 8 illustrates the histology of AAV-transduced Pro23H is retinas. Newborn Pro23His+/− rho+/− mice were subretinally injected with 1 μl 2×10¹² vp/ml AAV-shBB-rBB or AAV-EGFP (n=6). Ten days post-transduction eyes were processed for semi-thin sectioning and stained with toluidine blue. Approximately 40 measurements in three layers per eye of outer nuclear layer (ONL) thickness (μm) were taken. A: bars represent ONL thickness, of the central meridian of the eye, of the lowest and highest 15% values (p<0.01). B and C: representative images of AAV-shBB-rBB- and AAV-EGFP-(control) injected sections corresponding to highest ONL thickness values. Yellow arrows indicate ONL thickness. INL: inner nuclear layer. GCL: ganglion cell layer. Error bars represent SD values.

FIG. 9 illustrates suppression and/or replacement constructs used to generate recombinant AAV2/5 viruses using the procedures provided in Example 1. RHO suppression and or replacement constructs, pAAV-BB8, pAAV-BB9, pAAV-BB10, pAAV-BB11, pAAV-BB12, pAAV-BB13, pAAV-BB18, pAAV-BB26/Q26, pAAV-BB16, pAAV-BB24 and pAAV-BB27. Illustrations of some control constructs are also provided (pAAV-rho-EGFP and pAAV-CMV-EGFP). Suppression constructs with EGFP reporter genes are also provided (pAAV-shBB-EGFP, pAAV-shQ1-EGFP, pAAV-shCC-EGFP). Suppressors were expressed from the H1 promoter and replacement RHO cDNAs from differently sized mouse rhodopsin promoter sequences. HGH int: human growth hormone intron. CRX-NRL indicates enhancer element SEQ ID NO: 94. Restriction enzyme sites used for cloning are indicated. Promoters were separated by spacer DNA fragments. Numbers indicate molecular sizes (bp) and arrows indicate direction of transcription. Notably, any combination of the elements and conserved regions outlined and indeed other elements that can modulate gene expression could be used in the invention to exert control over expression of suppression and or replacement components.

FIG. 10 illustrates a comparison of levels of expression from the Rho-M transgene versus that obtained from the suppression and replacement constructs in AAV2/5 and represented in FIG. 9, using RNAse protection. FIG. 10 illustrates that the suppression and replacement constructs (see FIG. 9) engineered into AAV2/5, AAV-BB8, AAV-BB10, AAV-BB11, AAV-BB12, AAV-BB13 and AAV-BB16 express the human rhodopsin replacement gene in RNA extracted from 129 wild type mice subretinally injected with suppression and or replacement constructs. (Lanes with material from mouse eyes injected with AAV-BB8 are indicated by BB8, AAV-BB10 by BB10, AAV-BB11 by BB11 etc. The plasmid constructs used to generate AAV vectors are written in the format pAAV as presented in FIG. 9). BB8, BB10 and BB11 express rhodopsin at lower levels than BB12, BB13 and BB16.

FIG. 11 provides a comparative analysis of rhodopsin expression from rAAV2/5 suppression and replacement vectors using real time RT-PCR. FIG. 11 illustrates replacement rhodopsin expression levels in RNA extracted from 129 wild type mice subretinally injected with suppression and/or replacement constructs. Expression levels were also determined in Rho-M transgenic mice which express a rhodopsin replacement construct rCC and display normal retinal function. Suppression and replacement constructs BB12, BB13, BB16 and BB18 express approximately in the same order of magnitude as levels of replacement rhodopsin transcript in Rho-M mice, indicating that enhanced replacement constructs with enhancer elements and conserved regions may express sufficient levels of rhodopsin to sustain a functional retina in vivo. (Lanes with material from mouse eyes injected with AAV-BB8 are indicated by BB8, AAV-BB10 by BB10, AAV-BB11 by BB11 etc.)

FIG. 12 illustrates retinal histology of adult wild type retinas were subretinally injected with 2 ul of 2×10¹² particle/ml of different replacement-RHO AAV vectors (see FIG. 9). Two weeks post-injection transduced eyes were removed, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and cryosectioned (12 um). Subsequently, sections were stained with human specific anti-RHO antibody to visualize expression of replacement-RHO using Cy3 label (red) on the secondary antibody; cell nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (blue). A: AAV-BB8, B: AAV-BB13, C: AAV-BB24, D: AAV-Q8, E: AAV-Q26, F: retina from uninjected RhoM transgenic mouse expressing RHO (positive control). Sections indicate different levels of RHO expression in the sections. OS: photoreceptor outer segments; IS: photoreceptor inner segments; ONL: outer nuclear layer; INL: inner nuclear layer; GCL: ganglion cell layer.

FIG. 13 illustrates retinal histology of adult NHR transgenic mice on a rho−/− background, therefore expressing normal human RHO but not mouse rho. These mice were transduced by subretinal injection of 2 ul of 2×10¹² particle/ml of AAV-shQ1-EGFP (A) or AAV-shNT-EGFP (B). Two weeks after injection, eyes were removed, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and cryosectioned AAV-shQ1-EGFP expresses shRNA-Q1, which targets RHO, while AAV-shNT-EGFP expresses a non-targeting shRNA (FIG. 9 illustrates exemplary constructs). Both constructs express EGFP allowing tracking the transduced cell populations (green). Sections were counterstained DAPI (blue) to label position of the nuclear layers. A significant reduction in the photoreceptor cell number in the transduced part of the outer nuclear layer is apparent in the AAV-shQ1-EGFP injected (A) retinas compared to those of injected with AAV-shNT-EGFP (B). IS: photoreceptor inner segments; ONL: outer nuclear layer; INL: inner nuclear layer; GCL: ganglion cell layer.

FIG. 14A-C illustrates retinal histology of adult RHO-347 transgenic mice carrying a dominant RHO mutation on a mouse rho+/+ background causing retinal degeneration were subretinally injected with 2 ul of 2×10¹² particle/ml of AAV-shNT-EGFP (A) or AAV-shQ1-EGFP (B) vectors. Two weeks post-injection transduced eyes were removed, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and cryosectioned (12 um). AAV-shQ1-EGFP expresses shRNA-Q1-EGFP, which targets RHO, while AAV-shNT-EGFP expresses a non-targeting shRNA. Both constructs express EGFP allowing tracking of the transduced part of the retina (green). Sections were counterstained with DAPI (blue) to indicate positions of the nuclear layers. A significant reduction of the photoreceptor cell numbers in the transduced part of the outer nuclear layer in the AAV-shNT-EGFP injected or the uninjected (C) retinas are apparent due to the degenerative effects of RHO-347 transgene. A significantly preserved outer nuclear layer is detected in the AAV-shQ1-EGFP transduced retinas, where shRNA-Q1-EGFP effectively suppresses the RHO-347 transcript therefore reducing retinal degeneration. Note, that mouse rho (expressed in these retinas) is refractory to suppression by shRNA-Q1-EGFP due to the presence of nucleotide changes at the target site for Q1 siRNA suppression. Suppression and replacement using the degeneracy of the genetic code provided therapeutic benefit at a histological level. FIG. 14D provides evidence of an improvement in the electroretinogram (ERG) in RHO-347 eyes treated with AAV-shQ1-EGFP versus eyes treated with AAV-shNT-EGFP. FIG. 14D provides a representative maximum ERG response of a RHO-347 mouse, containing a human rhodopsin transgene with a mutation at codon 347, subretinally injected with AAV2/5 constructs. This RHO-347 mouse normally displays a phenotype similar to autosomal dominant RP. The top panel in FIG. 14D is the response of the right eye, which received an injection of AAV-shQ1, a AAV2/5 vector containing suppressor siRNA Q1 driven by an H1 promoter (shQ1) and a CMV-driven EGFP gene. The left eye received an AAV-shNT, a AAV2/5 containing a non-targeting (control) siRNA driven by an H1 promoter (shNT) and a CMV-driven EGFP gene. As can be seen in FIG. 14D, the maximum response is significantly greater in the treated right eye than in the control left eye, indicating that suppression of the mutant rhodopsin transgene leads to some rescue at the ERG level.

FIG. 15 illustrates exemplary constructs utilising chromatin opening elements to optimise expression are presented. Components utilised to enhance expression may be cloned into vectors such as AAV vectors. Elements to optimise expression of a given gene may be combined with other promoter elements such as the rhodopsin promoter and/or enhancer sequences or alternatively sequences that modulate chromatin structures and drive gene expression may be utilised alone to facilitate optimisation of expression of a target gene.

FIG. 16 shows sequences of exemplary elements that can facilitate modulation of chromatin structures.

FIG. 17 shows nucleotide and amino acid sequences of a number of exemplary neurotrophic factors.

FIG. 18 illustrates exemplary suppression and replacement constructs containing other genetic elements which are beneficial for photoreceptor cell survival. In the example pAAV-BB18 has been combined with neurotrophic factor GDNF, driven by a small UCOE (chromatin opening element. A Thrasher, Abstract 36, British Society for Gene Therapy 5^(th) Annual Conference 2008) promoter). Other neurotrophic factors such as, for example, Neurturin may also be used in combination with any of the suppression and replacement constructs described. In addition, other beneficial genes, other than neurotrophic factors may also be combined with suppression and replacement constructs such as for example, a second suppression element, a second replacement element, VEGF and others. In example A, the additional element, in this case GDNF is co-located with the suppression and replacement construct within the two AAV inverted terminal repeat sequences, ITR1 and ITR2. In the second example, B, the GDNF gene and its promoter are not co-located with the suppression and replacement elements within ITR1 and ITR2, but are located within the backbone of the plasmid used to generate AAV. Since a small proportion of the backbone is packaged during AAV production, this would result in a mixed population of AAVs with the majority containing the suppression and replacement elements and a minority the GDNF elements. In this case, other beneficial genes, other than neurotrophic factors may also be combined with suppression and replacement constructs such as for example, a second suppression element, a second replacement element, VEGF and others.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The instant invention utilises efficient gene suppression in conjunction with gene replacement to overcome the challenge of mutational heterogeneity. The suppression agent does not necessarily target a mutation (although it can encompass the site of a mutation), but is rather mutation independent. Suppression can involve one or both alleles of an endogenous gene. In conjunction with suppression, a replacement gene is provided that has been modified such that the replacement gene is refractory or partially refractory to suppression. The invention uses the degeneracy of the genetic code to modify the replacement gene. Alteration of “wobble” bases makes it possible for replacement nucleic acids to escape suppression at least in part, but does not change the protein product expressed from the replacement nucleic acids. Alternatively, replacement genes are modified in such a way that they encode altered amino acids but still encode a functional or partially functional protein that does not lead to pathology (e.g., because the amino acid changes are silent mutations or polymorphisms). Replacement has been demonstrated using rhodop sin nucleic acids, however, other genes or combinations of genes can be made and used in the practice of the invention. In particular, the invention relates to modulating and optimizing the expression levels of the suppression agents and/or replacement nucleic acids using one or more of the untranslated regions (UTRs) of a gene, intronic sequences, the degeneracy of the genetic code and/or polymorphisms to alter the sequence of replacement nucleic acids such that they are refractory or partially refractory to suppression.

In one aspect, the invention provides methods for preparing and using a suppression agent and replacement nucleic acid. The suppression agent binds to a coding region of a mature RNA or DNA encoding a mutant allele and inhibits expression of the mutant allele. The replacement nucleic acid encodes a wild-type or non-disease causing allele and comprises at least one degenerate/wobble nucleotide that is altered so that the replacement nucleic acid is not suppressed, or is only partially suppressed, by the suppression of one or both alleles of a gene.

The invention provides for replacement genes using sequences to enhance expression of replacement genes from viral and or non-viral vectors. In particular the invention relates to enhanced expression of suppression agent(s) and or replacement genes from viral or and non-viral vectors. The invention relates to use of conserved sequences from retinal genes to enhance expression of suppression agent(s) and or replacement genes. In a particular aspect the invention relates to use of conserved sequences from retinal genes to enhance expression of suppression agent(s) and or replacement genes from adeno associated virus (AAV) vectors. In another aspect the invention provides vectors for expression of suppression agent(s) and or replacement gene(s) using regulatory sequences from retinal gene(s) and or non-retinal gene(s) and or ubiquitously expressing genes such as those provided in the Tables below to enhance expression from viral and non-viral vectors.

In another aspect, the invention provides a composition comprising a suppression agent that binds to the coding region of a mature and/or immature RNA or DNA encoding a mutant allele to inhibit expression of the mutant allele and a replacement nucleic acid that encodes a wild-type or non-disease causing allele and comprises at least one degenerate/wobble nucleotide that is altered so that the replacement nucleic acid is not suppressed, or is only partially suppressed, by the suppression agent.

In yet another aspect, the invention provides a kit comprising a suppression agent that suppresses the expression of a mature and or immature RNA or DNA encoding a mutant allele and a replacement nucleic acid that encodes a wild-type or non-disease causing allele that is not suppressed, or is only partially suppressed, by the suppression agent and differs from the mutant allele in at least one degenerate/wobble nucleotide.

Suppression is achieved using a wide variety of molecular tools, such as, for example, RNA interference (RNAi) including non-coding RNAs such as small interfering RNA (siRNA), short hairpin RNA (shRNA), microRNAs (miRNA), or other nucleotide-based molecules. In an embodiment, siRNAs in the order of 14-27 nucleotides in length are used for gene suppression. ShRNAs can be used to express functional siRNAs intracellularly and to achieve suppression in vitro and in vivo. Other suppression molecules include, for example, sense and antisense nucleic acids (single or double stranded), ribozymes, peptides, DNAzymes, peptide nucleic acids (PNAs), triple helix forming oligonucleotides, antibodies, and aptamers and modified form(s) thereof directed to sequences in gene(s), RNA transcripts, or proteins.

In an embodiment, the invention relates to vector(s) for supplying an endogenously generated suppression agent, such as, for example, a dsRNA in the form of a short hairpin (shRNA) which can be processed intracellularly into siRNA. dsRNA may be locally or systemically delivered. Expression vectors are used to generate functional siRNAs in cells and in animals typically using polymerase III promoters to drive expression, although polymerase II promoters are also used. For example, miRNA structures can be used to express double stranded RNAs from polymerase II promoters to enable tissue specific expression of double stranded RNA or polymerase II promoters can be juxtaposed to shRNA sequences to be expressed.

Suppression agents may be modified to alter the potency of the suppression agent, the target affinity of the suppression agent, the safety profile of the suppression agent and/or the stability of the suppression agent, for example, to render them resistant or partially resistant to intracellular degradation. Modifications, such as phosphorothioates, for example, can be made to oligonucleotides to increase resistance to nuclease degradation, binding affinity and/or uptake. In addition, hydrophobization and bioconjugation enhances siRNA delivery and targeting (De Paula et al., RNA. 13(4):431-56, 2007) and siRNAs with ribo-difluorotoluyl nucleotides maintain gene silencing activity (Xia et al., ASC Chem. Biol. 1(3):176-83, (2006). siRNAs with amide-linked oligoribonucleosides have been generated which are more resistant to 51 nuclease degradation (Iwase R et al. 2006 Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 50: 175-176). In addition, modification of siRNA at the 2′-sugar position and phosphodiester linkage confers improved serum stability without loss of efficacy (Choung et al., Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 342(3):919-26, 2006). In one study, 2′-deoxy-2′-fluoro-beta-D-arabinonuclecic acid (FANA)-containing antisense oligonucleotides compared favourably to phosphorothioate oligonucleotides, 2′-0-methyl-RNA/DNA chimeric oligonucleotides and siRNAs in terms of suppression potency and resistance to degradation (Ferrari N et al. 2006 Ann N Y Acad Sci 1082: 91-102.)

Antisense and ribozyme suppression strategies have led to the reversal of a tumor phenotype by reducing expression of a gene product or by cleaving a mutant transcript at the site of the mutation (Carter and Lemoine Br. J. Cancer. 67(5):869-76, 1993; Lange et al., Leukemia. 6(11):1786-94, 1993; Valera et al., J. Biol. Chem. 269(46):28543-6, 1994; Dosaka-Akita et al., Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 102(5):660-4, 1994; Feng et al., Cancer Res. 55(10):2024-8, 1995; Quattrone et al., Cancer Res. 55(1):90-5, 1995; Lewin et al., Nat Med. 4(8):967-71, 1998). For example, neoplastic reversion was obtained using a ribozyme targeted to an H-ras mutation in bladder carcinoma cells (Feng et al., Cancer Res. 55(10):2024-8, 1995). Ribozymes have also been proposed as a means of both inhibiting gene expression of a mutant gene and of correcting the mutant by targeted trans-splicing (Sullenger and Cech Nature 371(6498):619-22, 1994; Jones et al., Nat. Med. 2(6):643-8, 1996). Ribozyme activity may be augmented by the use of, for example, non-specific nucleic acid binding proteins or facilitator oligonucleotides (Herschlag et al., Embo J. 13(12):2913-24, 1994; Jankowsky and Schwenzer Nucleic Acids Res. 24(3):423-9, 1996). Multitarget ribozymes (connected or shotgun) have been suggested as a means of improving efficiency of ribozymes for gene suppression (Ohkawa et al., Nucleic Acids Symp Ser. (29):121-2, 1993).

Triple helix approaches have also been investigated for sequence-specific gene suppression. Triplex forming oligonucleotides have been found in some cases to bind in a sequence-specific manner (Postel et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 88(18):8227-31, 1991; Duval-Valentin et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 89(2):504-8, 1992; Hardenbol and Van Dyke Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93(7):2811-6, 1996; Porumb et al., Cancer Res. 56(3):515-22, 1996). Similarly, peptide nucleic acids have been shown to inhibit gene expression (Hanvey et al., Antisense Res. Dev. 1(4):307-17, 1991; Knudsen and Nielson Nucleic Acids Res. 24(3):494-500, 1996; Taylor et al., Arch. Surg. 132(11):1177-83, 1997). Minor groove binding polyamides can bind in a sequence-specific manner to DNA targets and hence may represent useful small molecules for future suppression at the DNA level (Trauger et al., Chem. Biol. 3(5):369-77, 1996). In addition, suppression has been obtained by interference at the protein level using dominant negative mutant peptides and antibodies (Herskowitz Nature 329(6136):219-22, 1987; Rimsky et al., Nature 341(6241):453-6, 1989; Wright et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 86(9):3199-203, 1989). In some cases suppression strategies have lead to a reduction in RNA levels without a concomitant reduction in proteins, whereas in others, reductions in RNA have been mirrored by reductions in protein.

The diverse array of suppression strategies that can be employed includes the use of DNA and/or RNA aptamers that can be selected to target, for example, a protein of interest such as rhodopsin. In the case of age related macular degeneration (AMD), anti-VEGF aptamers have been generated and have been shown to provide clinical benefit in some AMD patients (Ulrich H, et al. Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screen 9: 619-632, 2006). Suppression and replacement using aptamers for suppression in conjunction with a modified replacement gene and encoded protein that is refractory or partially refractory to aptamer-based suppression could be used in the invention.

Recent evidence suggests that control of gene expression occurs endogenously in part by the activity of small non-coding RNAs, one broad category of which is termed microRNAs (miRNAs). miRNAs are expressed from polymerase II promoters, but can also be expressed from polymerase III promoters. miRNAs are processed intracellularly from larger transcripts to form small molecules approximately 20 nucleotides in length. miRNA structures can be used to express small double stranded RNAs and thus can be used to express the double stranded RNAs of the current invention.

Suppression targeted to coding sequence holds the advantage that such sequences are present in both precursor and mature RNAs, thereby enabling suppressor effectors to target all forms of RNA. A combined approach using a number of suppression effectors directed to multiple targets on an RNA or to multiple RNAs may also be used in the invention. As with suppression, multiple replacement nucleic acids can be used in the invention. For some disorders, it may be necessary to block expression of a disease allele completely to prevent disease symptoms whereas for others low levels of mutant protein may be tolerated. The invention can thus provide partial or complete suppression.

In one embodiment of the invention, suppressors are targeted to genes that are involved in the regulation of other genes. Suppression of these genes therefore may lead to up- or down-regulation of other genes.

In another embodiment, the invention relates to suppression of the expression of mutated genes that give rise to a dominant or deleterious effect or disease. A suppression effector may target either the disease allele or the normal allele. In another embodiment, the suppression effector targets both the disease allele and the normal allele.

In an embodiment of the invention, a replacement nucleic acid is provided that is altered at one or more degenerate or wobble bases from the endogenous wild type gene but that encodes the identical amino acids as the wild type or a non-disease causing gene. In another embodiment, the replacement nucleic acid encodes a beneficial replacement nucleic acid (e.g., a more active or stable product than that encoded by the wild-type gene). The replacement nucleic acid provides expression of a normal or non-disease causing protein product when required to ameliorate pathology associated with reduced levels of wild type protein. The same replacement nucleic acid can be used in conjunction with the suppression of many different disease mutations within a given gene. In addition, multiple replacement nucleic acids can be used in the invention.

Although the instant application provides numerous exemplary suppression agents and replacement nucleic acid sequences, these are only examples and other such sequences can be determined as described herein for the same targets or for any desired target. “Functional variant” includes any variant nucleic acid or other suppression agent that may have one or more nucleic acid substitutions but that does not have a materially different function than, or that can still hybridize under stringent hybridization conditions (0.2×SCC, 0.1% SDS) to, or that shares at least 70% identity, for example 80%, such as at least 90% or at least 95% sequence identity with the nucleic acid indicated.

In another embodiment of the invention, suppression effectors are targeted to the untranslated regions (either 5′UTR or 3′UTR) of at least one allele of a gene. In another embodiment of the invention replacement nucleic acids are provided that have been altered at the suppression site, such that replacement nucleic acids provide functional or partially functional protein and escape or partially escape from suppression by suppressors.

In another embodiment of the invention, suppression effectors are targeted to intronic sequences. In another embodiment, replacement nucleic acids are provided which have been altered at one or more nucleotides of the targeted site of the intron so that transcripts from the replacement nucleic acids escape or partially escape suppression by suppressors. In another embodiment the whole targeted intron may not be present in replacement nucleic acids.

In another embodiment of the invention, suppression effectors are targeted to polymorphic sites and at least one allele of the gene is suppressed or partially suppressed. In another embodiment, replacement nucleic acids are provided for the alternative polymorphic variant such that replacement nucleic acids encode functional or partially functional protein and escape or partially escape from suppression by suppressors.

In another embodiment of the invention the suppression agent and/or replacement nucleic acid is expressed from one or more promoter sequences. The invention provides promoter sequences that have been demonstrated to promote ubiquitous expression of nucleotides and/or promoters that have been demonstrated to exert tissue specific, temporal, inducible, and/or quantitative control of gene expression. The invention also provides enhancer sequences (Table 1) and/or post-translational regulatory elements and/or other regulatory elements and/or epigenetic elements that provide optimized expression of suppression agents and/or replacement nucleic acids.

TABLE 1 Exemplary Enhancer Elements Enhancer Element Reference Chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter Eguchi et al., Biochimie transcription factor II 89(3): 278-88, 2007 Mouse dystrophin muscle promoter/enhancer Anderson et al., Mol. Ther. 14(5): 724-34, 2006 Tobacco eIF4A-10 promoter elements Tian et al., J. Plant Physiol. 162(12): 1355-66, 2005 Immunoglobulin (Ig) enhancer element Frezza et al., Ann. Rheum. HS1,2A Dis. Mar. 28, 2007 Col9a1 enhancer element Genzer and Bridgewater Nucleic Acids Res. 35(4): 1178-86, 2007 Gata2 intronic enhancer Khandekar et al., Development Mar. 29, 2007 TH promoter enhancer Gao et al., Brain Res. 1130(1): 1-16, 2007 CMV enhancer InvivoGen cat# pdrive-cag 05A13-SV Woodchuck hepatitis virus Donello et al., J. Virol. posttranscriptional regulatory element 72(6): 5085-92, 1998 Woodchuck hepatitis virus Schambach et al., Gene posttranscriptional regulatory element Ther. 13(7): 641-5, 2006 IRBP Ying et al., Curr. Eye Res. 17(8): 777-82, 1998 CMV enhancer and chicken β-actin promoter InvivoGen cat# pdrive-cag 05A13-SV CMV enhancer and chicken β-actin promoter InvivoGen cat# pdrive-cag and 5′UTR 05A13-SV CpG-island Antoniou et al., Genomics 82: 269-279, 2003

In a particular embodiment, sequences that influence chromatin structure, such as but not exclusive to insulator, antirepressor, cis-acting modulators of nucleosome positioning and/or silencer elements, sometimes termed epigenetic elements, are used to modulate expression of suppression agents and/or replacement nucleic acids. Exemplary epigenetic elements such as insulator and antirepressor sequences are provided in Table 2. It is clear that chromatin structures influence gene expression, for example, chromatin structures influence the ability of the transcriptional machinery to access promoter and/or enhancer elements amongst other sequence motifs. The inclusion of sequences which influence chromatin structures in viral and/or non-viral vectors and/or administered in conjunction with suppression and/or replacement nucleic acids can be used to optimize expression of either or both suppressors and replacement nucleic acids. In addition, chemical entities which influence chromatin structures can be used to optimize expression such as histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors and/or DNA methyl transferase inhibitors and/or histone methyl transferase inhibitors. Such entities can be supplied in the form of DNA and/or RNA and/or protein amongst other forms. Similarly attracting enzymes and/or supplying enzymes (in the form of DNA and/or RNA and or protein) involved in chromatin remodelling such as but not exclusive to histone acetyl transferases to nucleic acids to be expressed and their associated regulatory regions can be used to optimize expression of suppression and/or replacement nucleic acids.

TABLE 2 Exemplary Epigenetic Elements Epigenetic elements Reference Mcp Insulators Kyrchanova et al., Mol. Cell Biol. 27(8): 3035-43, 2007 CpG-island region of the HNRPA2B1 Williams et al., BMC Biotechnol. locus 5: 17, 2005 Chicken b-globin 5′hypersensitive Kwaks and Otte 2006 Trends in site 4 (cHS4) Biotechnology 24: 137-142 Ubiquitous chromatin opening Kwaks and Otte 2006 Trends in elements (UCOEs) Biotechnology 24: 137-142 Matrix associated regions (MARs) Kwaks and Otte 2006 Trends in Biotechnology 24: 137-142 Stabilising and antirepressor Kwaks and Otte 2006 Trends in elements (STAR) Biotechnology 24: 137-142 Human growth hormone gene Trujillo MA et al. 2006 Mol silencer Endocrinol 20: 2559 S/MAR Liebich et al., Nucleic Acids Res. 30: 3433-42, 2002

In another embodiment, expression of a suppression agent and/or replacement nucleic acid is optimized to enable efficient suppression in conjunction with sufficient replacement. In an additional embodiment, suppression and/or replacement nucleic acids are provided with agents that aid vector transfection, transduction, and/or expression of suppression and replacement nucleic acids.

The invention circumvents the need for a specific therapy for every disease-causing mutation within a given gene. Notably, the invention has the advantage that the same suppression agents can be used to suppress many mutations in a gene. This is particularly relevant when any one of a large number of mutations within a single gene can cause disease pathology. The compositions and methods of the invention allow greater flexibility in choice of target sequence for suppression of expression of a disease allele. Furthermore, the compositions and methods of the invention allow greater flexibility in terms of controlling expression of the suppression and/or replacement of a given gene and or allele of a gene.

Suppression and replacement can be undertaken in conjunction with each other or separately. Suppression and replacement utilizing the degeneracy of the genetic code may be undertaken in test tubes, in cells, in animals, or in plants and may be used for experimental research (e.g., for the study of development or gene expression) or for therapeutic purposes. Suppression and replacement may be used in conjunction with agents to promote cell transfection or cell transduction such as, for example, lipids and polymers. Suppression and replacement may be provided to consumers in a kit.

The suppression and replacement agents of the invention can be delivered to a target cell and or tissue and or animal and or plant using ‘naked’ reagents such as DNA, RNA, peptides or other reagents. Alternatively viral and or non-viral vectors can be used with or without ‘naked’ reagents.

In an embodiment, suppression and/or replacement construct(s) can be delivered to a cell using an AAV2/5 recombinant virus, however, other viral and non-viral vectors, such as other AAV serotypes, adenovirus, herpes virus, SV40, HIV, SIV and other lentiviral vectors, RSV and non-viral vectors including naked DNA, plasmid vectors, peptide-guided gene delivery, terplex gene delivery systems, calcium phosphate nanoparticles, magnetic nanoparticles, colloidal microgels and/or the integrase system from bacteriophage phiC31 may be utilised in the invention, for example. Suppression and replacement components may be found on separate vectors or may be incorporated into the same vector. Viral vectors useful in the invention include, but are not limited to, those listed in Table 3. Non-viral vectors useful in the invention include, but are not limited to, those listed in Table 4. Cationic lipid-based non-viral vectors can include glycerol-based (e.g. DOTMA, DOTAP, DMRIE, DOSPA), non-glycerol-based (e.g. DOGS, DOTIM) and/or cholesterol-based cationic lipids (e.g. BGTC, CTAP; Karmali PP and Chaudhuri A 2006 Med Res Rev). Viral and non-viral vector delivery may be accompanied by other molecules such as cationic lipids and/or polymers and/or detergents and/or agents to alter pH, such as, for example, polyethelene glycol (PEG), to enhance cellular uptake of vectors and/or to enhance expression from vectors and/or to evade the immune system. For example, polycationic molecules have been generated to facilitate gene delivery including but not exclusive to cationic lipids, poly-amino acids, cationic block co-polymers, cyclodextrins amongst others. Pegylation of vectors with polyethelene glycol (PEG) can shield vectors from, for example, the extracellular environment. Vectors may be used in conjunction with agents to avoid or minimise cellular immune responses such as PEG or as a Polyplex with Poly(L-Lysine) Vector delivery may be undertaken using physical methodologies such as electroporation, nucleofection and/or ionotophoresis, either alone or in combination with molecules to enhance delivery. Vectors may be used in conjunction with agents to promote expression of suppression and/or replacement components incorporated into vectors, for example, using histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDAC) and/or DNA methyl transferase inhibitors and/or histone methyl transferase inhibitors to modulate chromatin structures thereby aiding expression. HDAC inhibitors include but are not exclusive to short chain fatty acids such as valproic acid and sodium butyrate, ketones, benzamides, cyclic and non-cyclic hydroxamates such as suberoyl anilide hydroxamic acids (SAHA), trichostatin A (TSA), cyclic peptides or tetrapeptides amongst others (Liu T et al. 2006 Cancer Treatment Reviews 32: 157-165). DNA methyl transferase inhibitors including, for example, 5-AC, decitabine and zebularine can be used to modulate chromatin structures. In addition, histone methyl transferase inhibitors can influence chromatin states, for example, BIX-01294 (diazepin-quinazolin-amine derivative). In addition, to the chemical entities referred to above, nucleic acids-based inhibitors can be used to suppress expression of proteins and/or non-coding RNAs involved in chromatin remodelling. In one embodiment of the invention vectors are optimized to specifically transduce target cell type(s) or target tissue type(s). Viral and/or non-viral vectors may be modified to target specific cell types and/or to prevent targeting of some cell types. For example, the inclusion of the capsid from AAV serotype 5 in an AAV2/5 hybrid virus facilitates transduction of photoreceptor cells. Similarly, for example, peptides may be included in viral vectors to facilitate targeting. Synthetic non-viral vectors can be modified to include ligands to facilitate targeting of vectors to specific cell and/or tissue types, for example, folate can be conjugated to liposomes to target tumour cells which over express the folate receptor (Hattori Y et al. 2005; Curr Drug Deliv 3: 243-52). In another embodiment of the invention, suppression and replacement vectors are designed to optimize the generation and/or production of vector, for example, to optimize viral titre and/or to optimize the number or type of nucleotides incorporated into vector(s). For example, vector genomes may be modified such that large transgenes may be incorporated into vectors, for example, ‘gutless’ adenovirus vectors have an increased capacity in terms of size than previous generations of adenovirus vectors. Components of vectors can be modified to optimize generation and production of vectors, for example, genes involved in replication of AAV can be modified to optimize replication and/or self complementary AAV vectors can be used to optimize rates of transgene expression. In an additional embodiment, vectors are designed to optimize suppression in conjunction with replacement, to enable optimal expression of all components of a therapeutic. For example, to optimize expression of both elements of suppression and replacement from a given vector, additional sequences can be included in the vector. For example, inclusion of nucleotides to separate the ITRs of AAV and the shRNA sequences of an RNAi-based suppression agent can result in optimisation of expression of the suppression component. Nucleotides encoding suppressors and/or replacement nucleic acids can be juxtaposed or separated from each other and/or can be in the same orientation or opposing orientations. In addition, the suppressor(s) can be 5′ and/or 3′ to the replacement nucleic acids. Nucleotides encoding suppressors and/or replacement nucleic acids can be juxtaposed to nucleotides comprising vector(s) or can be separated from nucleotides comprising vector(s). Nucleotides encoding suppressors and/or replacement nucleic acids may be cloned within the backbone of the plasmid used to generate AAV and or may be cloned between the AAV ITRs and not within the plasmid backbone of the plasmid, and/or may be cloned in a combination of these positions. Additional sequences, such as, for example, stuffer sequences can be included in vectors to optimize vector design. In addition, multiple suppressors and/or replacement nucleic acids may be used in one vector.

TABLE 3 Exemplary Viral Vectors Delivery Method Serotype Reference AAV All serotypes, Lebkowski et al., Mol. including but Cell Biol. 8(10): 3988- not limited to 96, 1988 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, Flannery et al., Proc. 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 12, 94(13): 6916-21, 1997 Lentivirus (for example VSV-G Pang et al., Mol. Vis. but not exclusively Rabies-G 12: 756-67, 2006 Feline—FIV, Further Takahashi Methods Mol. Equine—EIAV, serotypes** Biol. 246: 439-49, 2004 Bovine—BIV and Balaggan et al., J. Gene Simian—SIV). Med. 8(3): 275-85, 2006 Adenovirus Various Bennett et al., Nat. Med. 2(6): 649-54, 1996 Simian papovirius SV40 Various Kimchi-Sarfaty et al., Hum. Gene Ther. 13(2): 299-310, 2002 Semliki Forest Virus Various DiCiommo et al., Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sco. 45(9): 3320-9, 2004 Sendai Virus Various Ikeda et al., Exp. Eye Res. 75(1): 39-48, 2002

-   -   The list provided is not exhaustive; other viral vectors and         derivatives, natural or synthesized could be used in the         invention.

TABLE 4 Exemplary Non-Viral Vectors or Delivery Methods Delivery Method Reference Cationic Sakurai et al., Gene Ther. 8(9): 677-86, liposomes 2001 HVJ liposomes Hangai et al., Arch. Ophthalmol. 116(3): 342-8, 1998 Polyethylenimine Liao and Yau Biotechniques 42(3): 285- 6, 2007 DNA nanoparticles Farjo et al., PloS ONE 1: e38, 2006 Dendrimers Marano et al., Gene Ther. 12(21): 1544-50, 2005 Bacterial Brown and Giaccia Cancer Res. 58(7): 1408-16, 1998 Macrophages Griffiths et al., Gene Ther. 7(3): 255-62, 2000 Stem cells Hall et al., Exp. Hematol. 34(4): 433-42, 2006 Retinal transplant Ng et al., Chem. Immunol. Allergy 92: 300-16, 2007 Marrow/Mesenchymal Kicic et al., J. Neurosci. 23(21): 7742-9, stromal cells 2003 Chng et al., J. Gene Med. 9(1): 22-32, 2007 Implant (e.g., Montezuma et al., Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Poly(imide)uncoated Sci. 47(8): 3514-22, 2006 or coated) Electroporation Featherstone A. Biotechnol. Lab. 11(8): 16, 1993 Targeting peptides Trompeter et al., J. Immunol Methods. (for example but 274(1-2): 245-56, 2003 not exclusively Tat) Lipid mediated (e.g., Nagahara et al., Nat. Med. 4(12): 1449-52, DOPE, PEG) 1998 Zeng et al., J. Virol. 81(5): 2401-17, 2007 Caplen et al., Gene Ther. 2(9): 603-13, 1995Manconi et al., Int. J. Pharm. 234(1- 2): 237-48, 2006 Amrite et al., Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 47(3): 1149-60, 2006 Chalberg et al., Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 46(6): 2140-6, 2005

The list provided is not exhaustive. Other non-viral vectors and derivatives, natural or synthesized and other delivery methods could be used with the invention.

In an embodiment, the replacement nucleic acid encodes mammalian rhodopsin, collagen 1A1, collagen 1A2, collagen 7A1, or peripherin. In another embodiment, the replacement nucleic acid encodes a protein that has been mutated to cause an autosomal or X-linked dominant retinitis pigmentosa, such as those listed in Table 5. Suppression agents and replacement nucleic acids may be generated for one or more of these genes, for example.

TABLE 5 Genes known to be involved in retinitis pigmentosa (Table adapted from RETNET) (http://www.sph.uth.tmc.edu/Retnet/) Symbols; OMIM Numbers Location Diseases; Protein References LCA9 1p36 recessive Leber congenital Keen et al., Hum. Mol. amaurosis Genet. 3: 367-368 (1994) NPHP4, 1p36.31 recessive Senior-Loken Mollet et al., Nat. SLSN4; syndrome; recessive Genet. 32: 300-305 nephronophthisis, juvenile; (2002); Otto et al., Am. protein: nephronophthisis 4 J. Hum. Genet. protein 71: 1161-1167 (2002); Schuermann et al., Am. J. Hum. Genet. 70: 1240-1246 (2002) RP32; 1p34.3-p13.3 recessive RP, severe Zhang et al., Hum. Genet. 118: 356-365 (2005) RPE65, 1p31.2 recessive Leber congenital Acland Nat. Genet. LCA2, RP20; amaurosis; recessive RP; protein: 28: 92-95 (2001) retinal pigment epithelium- specific 65 kD protein ABCA4, 1p22.1 recessive Stargardt disease, Lewis et al., Am. J. ABCR, RP19, juvenile and late onset; recessive Hum. Genet. 64: 422- STGD1; MD; recessive RP; recessive 1434 (1999) fundus flavimaculatus; recessive cone-rod dystrophy; protein: ATP-binding cassette transporter - retinal COL11A1, 1p21.1 dominant Stickler syndrome, type Annunen et al., Am. J. STL2; II; dominant Marshall syndrome; Hum. Genet. 65: 974- protein: collagen, type XI, alpha 1 983 (1999) GNAT2, 1p13.3 recessive achromatopsia; protein: Aligianis et al., J. Med. ACHM4; guanine nucleotide binding Genet. 39: 656-660 protein (G protein) cone-specifc (2002) transducin alpha subunit PRPF3, 1q21.2 dominant RP; protein: human Chakarova et al., Hum. HPRP3, homolog of yeast pre-mRNA Mol. Genet. 11: 87-92 PRP3, RP18; splicing factor 3 (2002) SEMA4A, 1q22 dominant RP; dominant cone-rod Abid et al., J. Med. SEMAB; dystrophy; protein: semaphorin Genet. 43: 378-381 4A (2005) CORD8; 1q23.1-q23.3 recessive cone-rod dystrophy Ismail et al., J. Hum. Genet. 51: 827-831 (2006) AXPC1 1q31-q32 recessive ataxia, posterior column Higgins et al., Neurol. with RP 52: 146-150 (1999) ARMD1, 1q31.1 dominant MD, age-related; Schultz et al., Hum. FIBL6, protein: hemicentin 1 (fibulin 6) Mol. Genet. 12: 3315- FBLN6; 3123 (2003) CFH, HF1; 1q31.3 age-related macular degeneration, Edwards et al., Science complex etiology; protein: 308: 421-424 (2005) complement factor H CRB1, RP12; 1q31.3 recessive RP with para-arteriolar Jacobson et al., Hum. preservation of the RPE (PPRPE); Mol. Genet. 9: 1073- recessive RP; recessive Leber 1078 (2003) congenital amaurosis; dominant pigmented paravenous chorioretinal atrophy; protein: crumbs homolog 1 RD3, 1q32.3 recessive Leber congenital Friedman et al., Am. J. C1ORF36; amaurosis; protein: RD3 protein Hum. Genet. 79: 1059- 1070 (2006) USH2A; 1q41 recessive Usher syndrome, type Seyedahmadi et al., 2a; recessive RP; protein: usherin Exp. Eye. Res. 79: 167- 173 (2004) RP28; 2p16-p11 recessive RP Kumar et al., Mol. Vis. 10: 399-402 (2004) EFEMP1, 2p16.1 dominant radial, macular drusen; Kermani et al., Hum. DHRD, dominant Doyne honeycomb Genet. 104: 77-82 MTLV, retinal degeneration (Malattia (1999) FBLN3; Leventinese); protein: EGF- containing fibrillin-like extracellular matrix protein 1 (fibulin 3) ALMS1, 2p13.1 recessive Alström syndrome; Hearn et al., Nat. ALSS protein: ALMS1 protein Genet. 31: 79-83 (2002) RP33 2cen-q12.1 dominant RP Zhao et al., Hum. Genet. 119: 617-623 (2006) LOC619531 2q11 recessive cone-rod dystrophy and Michaelides et al., J. amelogenesis imperfecta Med. Genet. 41: 468- 473 (2004) CNGA3, 2q11.2 recessive achromatopsia; protein: Nishiguchi et al., Hum. ACHM2, cone photoreceptor cGMP-gated Mutat. 25: 248-258 CNCG3, cation channel alpha subunit (2005) RMCH2 MERTK 2q13 recessive RP; protein: c-mer Vollrath et al., Proc. protooncogene receptor tyrosine Natl. Acad. Sci. USA kinase 98: 12584-12589 (2001) NPHP1, 2q13 recessive Senior-Loken Hildebrandt et al., Nat. JBTS4, syndrome; recessive Genet. 17: 149-153 SLSN1 nephronophthisis, juvenile; (1997) recessive Joubert syndrome; protein: nephronophthisis 3 protein BBS5 2q31.1 recessive Bardet-Biedl syndrome; Li et al., Cell. 117: 541- protein: flagellar apparatus-basal 552 (2004) body protein DKFZp7621194 CERKL, 2q31.3 recessive RP; protein: ceramide Tuson et al., Am. J. RP26 kinase-like protein Hum. Genet. 74: 128- 138 (2004) SVD 2q36 dominant vitreoretinal Jiao et al., Invest. degeneration, snowflake Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 45: 4498-503 (2004) SAG 2q37.1 recessive Oguchi disease; Nakazawa et al., Arch. recessive RP; protein: arrestin (s- Ophthalmol. 116: 498- antigen) 501 (1998) USH2B, 3p24.2-p23 recessive Usher syndrome, type 2; Hmani et al., Eur. J. DFNB6 recessive sensorineural deafness Hum. Genet. 7: 363-367 without RP (1999) CRV, 3p21.3-p21.1 dominant hereditary vascular Ophoff et al., Am. J. HERNS, HVR retinopathy with Raynaud Hum. Genet. 69: 447- phenomenon and migraine 453 (2001) GNAT1 3p21.31 dominant CSNB, Nougaret type; Dryja et al., Nat. Genet. protein: rod transducin alpha 13: 358-360 (1996) subunit ATXN7, 3p14.1 dominant spinocerebellar ataxia Aleman et al., Exp. ADCA2, w/MD or retinal degeneration; Eye. Res. 74: 737-745 OPCA3, protein: ataxin 7 (2002) SCA7 ARL6, BBS3 3q11.2 recessive Bardet-Biedl syndrome; Fan et al., Nat. Genet. protein: ADP-ribosylation factor- 36: 989-993 (2004) like 6 IQCB1, 3q13.33 recessive Senior-Loken Otto et al., Nat. Genet. NPHP5, syndrome; protein: IQ motif 37: 282-288 (2005) SLSN5 containing B1 protein NPHP3, 3q22.1 recessive Senior-Loken Olbrich et al., Nat. SLSN3 syndrome; recessive Genet. 34: 455-459 nephronophthisis, adolescent; (2003) protein: nephronophthisis 3 protein RHO, RP4 3q22.1 dominant RP; dominant CSNB; Dryja et al., Nat. Genet. recessive RP; protein: rhodopsin 4: 280-283 (1993) RP5 same as RHO not distinct from RHO/RP4 Farrar et al., Hum. Mol. Genet. 1: 769-771 (1992) USH3A, 3q25.1 recessive Usher syndrome, type 3; Joensuu et al., Am. J. USH3 protein: clarin-1 Hum. Genet. 69: 673- 684 (2001) OPA1 3q29 dominant optic atrophy, Kjer Aung et al., Hum. type; dominant optic atrophy with Genet. 110: 52-56 sensorineural hearing loss; (2002) protein: OPA1 protein STGD4 4p dominant Stargardt-like macular Kniazeva et al., Am. J. dystrophy Hum. Genet. 64: 1394- 1399 (1999) MCDR2 4p16.3-p15.2 dominant MD, bull's-eye Michaelides et al., Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 44: 1657-1662 (2003) PDE6B, 4p16.3 recessive RP; dominant CSNB; Pearce-Kelling et al., CSNB3 protein: rod cGMP Mol. Vis. 7: 42-47 phosphodiesterase beta subunit (2001) WFS1, 4p16.1 recessive Wolfram syndrome; Hum. Mol. Genet. DFNA38 dominant low frequency 10: 2501-2508 (2001) sensorineural hearing loss; protein: wolframin PROML1 4p15.32 recessive retinal degeneration; Maw et al., Hum. Mol. protein: prominin (mouse)-like 1 Genet. 9: 27-34 (2000) CNGA1, 4p12 recessive RP; protein: rod cGMP- Dryja et al., Proc. Natl. CNCG, gated channel alpha subunit Acad. Sci. USA CNCG1 192: 10177-10181 (1995) WFS2 4q22-q24 recessive Wolfram syndrome; El-Shanti et al., Am. J. dominant Hum. Genet. 66: 1229- 1236 (2000) MTP, ABL 4q23 recessive abetalipoproteinemia; Narcisi et al., Am. J. protein: microsomal triglyceride Hum. Genet. 57: 1298- transfer protein 1310 (1995) BBS7, 4q27 recessive Bardet Biedl syndrome; Badano et al., Am. J. BBS2L1 protein: BBS7 protein Hum. Genet. 72: 650- 658 (2003) BBS12, 4q27 recessive Bardet-Biedl syndrome; Stoetzel et al., Am. J. FLJ35630 protein: BBS12 protein Hum. Genet. 80: 1-11 (2007) RP29 4q32-q34 recessive RP Hameed et al., Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 42: 1436-1438 (2001) LRAT 4q32.1 recessive RP, severe early-onset; Thompson et al., Nat. recessive Leber congenital Genet. 128: 123-124 amaurosis; protein: lecithin (2001) retinol acyltransferase CYP4V2, 4q35.2 recessive Bietti crystalline Li et al., Am. J. Hum. BCD corneoretinal dystrophy; protein: Genet. 74: 817-826 cytochrome P450 4V2 (2004) MCDR3 5p15.33-p13.1 dominant MD Michaelides et al., Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 44: 2178-2183 (2003) CSPG2, 5q14.3 dominant Wagner disease and Kloeckener-Gruissem WGN1, erosive vitreoretinopathy; protein: et al., Mol. Vis. 12: 350- ERVR chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan 2 355 (2006) (versican) MASS1, 5q14.3 recessive Usher syndrome, type 2; Weston et al., Am. J. USH2C, dominant/recessive febrile Hum. Genet. 74: 357- VLGR1 convulsions; protein: monogenic 366 (2004) audiogenic seizure susceptibility 1 homolog BSMD 5q21.2-q33.2 dominant MD, butterfly-shaped den Hollander et al., J. Med. Genet. 41: 699- 702 (2004) PDE6A 5q33.1 recessive RP; protein: cGMP Dryja et al., Invest. phosphodiesterase alpha subunit Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 40: 1859-1865 (1999). GRM6 5q35.3 recessive CSNB; protein: Dryja et al., Proc. Natl. metabotropic glutamate receptor 6 Acad. Sci. USA 102: 4884-4889 (2005) C2 6p21.32 age-related macular degeneration, Gold et al., Nat. Genet. complex etiology; protein: 38: 458-462(2006) complement component 2 CFB, BF, 6p21.32 age-related macular degeneration, Gold et al., Nat. Genet. BFD complex etiology; protein: 38: 458-462 (2006) complement factor B, properdin TULP1, RP14 6p21.31 recessive RP; recessive Leber Banerjee et al., Nat. congenital amaurosis; protein: Genet. 18: 177-179 tubby-like protein 1 (1998) RDS, RP7 6p21.2 dominant RP; dominant MD; Hum. Mutat. 10: 301- digenic RP with ROM1; 309 (1997) dominant adult vitelliform MD; protein: peripherin 2 GUCA1A, 6p21.1 dominant cone dystrophy; Payne et al., Am. J. COD3, dominant cone-rod dystrophy; Hum. Genet. 61: A290 GCAP1 protein: guanylate cyclase (1997) activating protein 1A GUCA1B, 6p21.1 dominant RP; dominant MD; Sato et al., Graefes GCAP2 protein: guanylate cyclase Arch. Clin. Exp. activating protein 1B Ophthalmol. 243: 235- 242 (2004) BCMAD 6p12.3-q16 dominant MD, benign concentric van Lith-Verhoeven et annular al., Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 45: 30-35 (2004) RP25 6cen-q15 recessive RP Abd El-Aziz et al., Ann. Hum. Genet. (2006) LCA5 6q11-q16 recessive Leber congenital Dharmaraj et al., Am. J. amaurosis Hum. Genet. 66: 319- 326 (2000) COL9A1 6q13 recessive Stickler syndrome; Van Camp et al., Am. dominant multiple epiphyseal J. Hum. Genet. 79: 449- dysplasia (MED); protein: 457 (2006) collagen, type IX, alpha-1 RIMS1, 6q13 dominant cone-rod dystrophy; Kelsell et al., Am. J. CORD7, protein: regulating synaptic Hum. Genet. 63: 274- RIM1 membrane exocytosis protein 1or 279 (1998) rab3A-interacting molecule MCDR1, 6q14-q16.2 dominant MD, North Carolina Small et al., Mol. Vis. PBCRA type; dominant progressive 5: 38 (1999) bifocal chorioretinal atrophy ELOVL4, 6q14.1 dominant MD, Stargardt-like; Edwards et al., Invest. STGD3 protein: elongation of very long Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. fatty acids protein 42: 2652-2663 (2001) AHI1, JBTS3 6q23.3 recessive Joubert syndrome; Parisi et al., J. Med. protein: Abelson helper Genet. 43: 334-339 integration site 1 (2006) PEX7, 6q23.3 recessive Refsum disease, adult van den Brink 0et al., PTS2R, form; protein: peroxisome Am. J. Hum. Genet. RCDP1, biogenesis factor 7 72: 471-477 (2003) RCD1 6q25-q26 dominant retinal-cone dystrophy OMIM 07 1 MDDC, 7p21-p15 dominant MD, cystoid Inglehearn et al., Am. J. CYMD Hum. Genet. 55: 581- 582 (1994) PTHB1, 7p14.3 recessive Bardet Biedl syndrome; Nishimura et al., Am. J. BBS9, PHTB1 protein: parathyroid hormone- Hum. Genet. 77: 1021- responsive B1 protein 1033 (2005) RP9, PAP1, 7p14.3 dominant RP; protein: RP9 Sullivan et al., Invest. PIM1K protein or PIM1-kinase associated Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. protein 1 47: 3052-3064 (2006) PEX1, IRD 7q21.2 recessive Refsum disease, Portsteffen et al., Nat. infantile form; protein: Genet. 17: 449-452 peroxisome biogenesis factor 1 (1997) IMPDH1, 7q32.1 dominant RP; dominant Leber Mortimer et al., RP10 congenital amaurosis; protein: Biochem. J. 390: 41-47 inosine monophosphate (2005) dehydrogenase 1 OPN1SW, 7q32.1 dominant tritanopia; protein: blue Fitzgibbon et al., Hum. BCP, CBT cone opsin Genet. 93: 79-80 (1994) CORD9 8p11 recessive cone-rod dystrophy Danciger et al., Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 42: 2458-2465 (2001) RP1 8q12.1 dominant RP; recessive RP; Bowne et al., Hum. protein: RP1 protein Mol. Genet. 11: 2121- 2128 (1999) TTPA 8q12.3 recessive RP and/or recessive or Yokota et al., New dominant ataxia; protein: alpha- Eng. J. Med. 335: 1770- tocopherol-transfer protein 1771 (1996) ROA1 8q21-q22 recessive optic atrophy Barbet et al., Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 11: 966- 971 (2003) PXMP3, 8q21.13 recessive Refsum disease, Gartner et al., Nat. PAF1, PEX2, infantile form; protein: Genet. 1: 16-23 (1992) PMP35 peroxisomal membrane protein 3 CNGB3, 8q21.3 recessive achromatopsia Kohl et al., Eur. J. ACHM3 Pingelapese; recessive, Hum. Genet. 13: 302- progressive cone dystrophy; 308 (2005) protein: cone cyclic nucleotide- gated cation channel beta 3 subunit VMD1 not 8q24 dominant MD, atypical Sohocki et al., Am. J. vitelliform Hum. Genet. 61: 239- 241 (1997) RP31 9p22-p13 dominant RP Papaioannou et al., Hum. Mut. 118: 501- 503 (2005) KCNV2 9q24.2 recessive cone dystrophy with Wu et al., Am. J. Hum. supernormal rod Genet. 79: 574-579 electroretinogram; protein: (2006) potasium channel subfamily V member 2 INVS, NPHP2 9q31.1 recessive Senior-Loken O'Toole et al., Nephrol. syndrome; recessive Dial. Transplant. nephronophthisis; protein: 21: 1989-1991 (2006) inverson DFNB31 9q32 recessive Usher syndrome, type 2; Ebermann et al., Hum. recessive deafness without RP; Genet. (2006) protein: whirlin TLR4 9q33.1 age-related macular degeneration, Zareparsi et al., Hum. complex etiology; protein: toll- Mol. Genet. 14: 1449- like receptor 4 1455 (2005) TRIM32, 9q33.1 recessive Bardet-Biedl syndrome; Chiang et al., Proc. BBS11, HT2A recessive limb-girdle muscular Natl. Acad. Sci. USA dystrophy; protein: tripartite 103: 6287-6292 (2006) motif-containing protein 32 RP21, RP8 not 9q34-qter dominant RP with sensorineural Mansergh et al., Am. J. deafness Hum. Genet. 64: 971- 985 (1999) JBTS1, 9q34 recessive Joubert syndrome Saar et al., Am. J. Hum. CORS1 Genet. 65: 1666-1671 (1999) PHYH, 10p13 recessive Refsum disease, adult Jansen et al., Nat. PAHX, RDPA form; protein: phytanoyl-CoA Genet. 17: 190-193 hydroxylase (1997) RNANC 10q21 recessive nonsyndromal Ghiasvand et al., Am. J. congenital retinal nonattachmen Med. Genet. 90: 165- 168 (2000) PCDH15, 10q21.1 recessive Usher syndrome, type Ahmed et al., Hum. DFNB23, 1f; recessive deafness without Mol. Genet. 12: 3215- USH1F RP; protein: protocadherin 15 3223 (2003) CDH23, 10q22.1 recessive Usher syndrome, type Astuto et al., Am. J. DFNB12, 1d; recessive deafness without Hum. Genet. 71: 262- USH1D RP; protein: cadherin-like gene 275 (2002) 23 RGR 10q23.1 recessive RP; dominant choroidal Morimura et al., Nat. sclerosis; protein: RPE-retinal G Genet. 23: 393-394 protein-coupled receptor (1999) RBP4 10q23.33 recessive RPE degeneration; Seeliger et al., Invest. protein: retinol-binding protein 4 Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 40: 3-11 (1999) PAX2, ONCR 10q24.31 dominant renal-coloboma Favor et al., Proc. Natl. syndrome; protein: paired Acad. Sci. USA homeotic gene 2 protein 93: 13870-13875 (1996) HTRA1, 10q26.13 age-related macular degeneration, DeWan et al., Science PRSS11 complex etiology; protein: HtrA 314: 989-992 (2006) serine peptidase 1 LOC387715 10q26.13 age-related macular degeneration, Jakobsdottir et al., Am. complex etiology; protein: J. Hum. Genet. 77: 389- hypothetical protein with Entrez 407 (2005) ID 387715 OAT 10q26.13 recessive gyrate atrophy; protein: D Valle, O Simell. In ornithine aminotransferase ‘The Metabolic and Molecular Bases of Inherited Disease’, 8th Ed. C R Schriver, et al. eds., McGraw-Hill. (2000) TEAD1, AA, 11p15.3 dominant atrophia areata; protein: Fossdal et al., Hum. TCF13, TEF1 TEA domain family member 1 Mol. Genet. 13: 975- [Entrez] 981 (2004) USH1C, 11p15.1 recessive Usher syndrome, Ahmed et al., Hum. DFNB18 Acadian; recessive deafness Genet. 110: 527-531 without RP; protein: harmonin (2002) EVR3 11p13-p12 dominant familial exudative Downey et al., Am. J. vitreoretinopathy Hum. Genet. 68: 778- 781 (2001) CORS2, 11p12-q13.3 recessive Joubert syndrome Valente et al., Ann. JBTS2 Neurol. 57: 513-519 (2005) ROM1 11q12.3 dominant RP; digenic RP with Dryja et al., Invest. RDS; protein: retinal outer Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. segment membrane protein 1 18: 1972-1982 (1997) VMD2 11q12.3 dominant MD, Best type; Weber et al., Am. J. dominant Hum. Genet. 55: 1182- vitreoretinochoroidopathy; 1187 (1994a) protein: bestrophin BBS1 11q13 recessive Bardet-Biedl syndrome; Mykytyn et al., Nat. protein: BBS1 protein Genet. 31: 435-438 (2002) VRNI 11q13 dominant neovascular Stone et al., Hum. Mol. inflammatory vitreoretinopathy Genet. 1: 685-689 (1992) CABP4 11q13.1 recessive CSNB; protein: calcium Zeitz et al., Am. J. binding protein 4 Hum. Genet. 79: 657- 667 (2006) LRP5, EVR4, 11q13.2 dominant familial exudative Jiao et al., Am. J. Hum. HBM, OPPG vitreoretinopathy; dominant high Genet. 75: 878-884 bone mass trait; recessive (2004) osteoporosis-pseudoglioma syndrome; recessive FEVR; protein: low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5 MYO7A, 11q13.5 recessive Usher syndrome, type 1 ; Gibbs et al., Natl. DFNB2, recessive congenital deafness Acad. Sci. USA USH1B without RP; recessive atypical 100: 6481-6486 (2003) Usher syndrome (USH3-like); protein: myosin VIIA FZD4, EVR1, 11q14.2 dominant familial exudative Müller et al., Genomics FEVR vitreoretinopathy; protein: 20: 317-319(1994) frizzled-4 Wnt receptor homolog C1QTNF5, 11q23.3 dominant MD, late onset; Ayyagari et al., Invest. CTRP5 dominant MD with lens zonules; Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. protein: C1q and tumor necrosis- 46: 3363-3371 (2005) related protein 5 collagen COL2A1, 12q13.11 dominant Stickler syndrome, type Snead et al., J. Med. AOM, STL1 I; dominant Wagner syndrome; Genet. 36: 353-659 dominant epiphyseal dysplasia; (1999) protein: collagen, type II, alpha 1 RDH5, RDH1 12q13.2 recessive fundus albipunctatus; Cideciyan et al., Vis. recessive cone dystrophy, late Neurosci. 17: 667-678 onset; protein: 11-cis retinol (2000) dehydrogenase 5 BBS10, 12q21.2 recessive Bardet-Biedl syndrome; Stoetzel et al., Nat. FLJ23560 protein: BBS10 (C12orf58) Genet. 38: 521-524 chaperonin (2006) CEP290, 12q21.32 recessive Senior-Loken Chang et al., Hum. JBTS5, syndrome; recessive Joubert Mol. Genet. 15: 1847- NPHP6, syndrome; recessive Leber 1857 (2006) SLSN6 congenital amaurosis; protein: centrosomal protein 290 kDa RB1 13q14.2 dominant germline or somatic Lohmann et al., Am. J. retinoblastoma; benign retinoma; Hum. Genet. 58: 940- pinealoma; osteogenic sarcoma; 949 (1996) protein: retinoblastoma protein 1 GRK1, 13q34 recessive CSNB, Oguchi type; Cideciyan et al., Proc. RHOK, RK protein: rhodopsin kinase Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 328-333 (1998) STGD2 not 13q34 dominant MD, Stargardt type Zhang et al., Nat. Genet. 27: 89-93 (2001) ACHM1, 14 recessive rod monochromacy or Pentao et al., Am. J. RMCH achromatopsia Hum. Genet. 50: 690- 699 (1992) RP16 not 14 recessive RP Bruford et al., Am. J. Hum. Genet. 55: A181 (1994) MCDR4 14q dominant MD, North Carolina- Francis et al., Br. J. like with progressive Ophthalmol. 87: 893- sensorineural hearing loss 898 (2003) NRL, RP27 14q11.2 dominant RP; recessive RP; Mears et al., Nat. protein: neural retina lucine Genet. 29: 447-452 zipper (2001) RPGRIP1, 14q11.2 recessive Leber congenital Mellersh et al., LCA6 amaurosis; protein: RPGR- Genomics 88: 293-301 interacting protein 1 (2006) LCA3 14q24 recessive Leber congenital Stockton et al., Hum. amaurosis Genet. 103: 328-333 (1998) RDH12 14q24.1 recessive Leber congenital Janecke et al., Nat. amaurosis with severe childhood Genet. 36: 850-854 retinal dystrophy; protein: retinol (2004) dehydrogenase 12 USH1A, not 14q32 recessive Usher syndrome, Gerber et al., Am. J. USH1 French Hum. Genet. 78: 357- 359 (2006) TTC8, BBS8 14q32.11 recessive Bardet-Biedl syndrome; Ansley et al., Nat. protein: tetratricopeptide repeat 425: 628-633 (2003) domain 8 FBLN5 14q32.12 familial MD, age-related; protein: Arch. Ophthalmol. fibulin 5 112: 765-772 (1994) NR2E3, 15q23 recessive enhanced S-cone Sharon et al., Arch. ESCS, PNR syndrome; recessive RP in Ophthalmol. 121: 1316- Portuguese Crypto Jews; 1323 (2003) Goldmann-Favre syndrome; protein: nuclear receptor subfamily 2 group E3 MRST 15q24 recessive retardation, spasticity Mitchell et al., Am. J. and retinal degeneration Hum. Genet. 62: 1070- 1076 (1998) BBS4 15q24.1 recessive Bardet-Biedl syndrome; Katsanis et al., Nat. protein: BBS4 protein Genet. 26: 67-70 (2000) RLBP1, 15q26.1 recessive RP; recessive Bothnia Burstedt et al., Invest. CRALBP dystrophy; recessive retinitis Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. punctata albescens; recessive 40: 995-1000 (1999) Newfoundland rod-cone dystrophy; protein: retinaldehyde- binding protein 1 ABCC6, 16p13.11 recessive pseudoxanthoma Bergen et al., Nat. ARA, MRP6, elasticum; dominant Genet. 25: 228-231 PXE pseudoxanthoma elasticum; (2000) protein: ATP-binding casette, subfamily C, member 6 RP22 16p12.3-p12.1 recessive RP Finckh et al., Genomics 48: 341-345 (1998) CLN3, JNCL 16p11.2 recessive Batten disease (ceroid- Kremmidiotis et al., lipofuscinosis, neuronal 3), Hum. Mol. Genet. juvenile; protein: Batten disease 8: 523-531 (1999) protein BBS2 16q12.2 recessive Bardet-Biedl syndrome; Beales et al., Am. J. protein: BBS2 protein Hum. Genet. 68: 606- 616 (2001) CNGB1, 16q13 recessive RP; protein: rod cGMP- Bareil et al., Hum. CNCG2, gated channel beta subunit Genet. 108: 328-334 CNCG3L, (2001) GAR1, GARP CDH3, 16q22.1 recessive MD, juvenile with Indelman et al., J. CDHP, PCAD hypotrichosis; protein: cadherin 3, Invest. Dermatol. type 1, placental 119: 1210-1213 (2002) FHASD 16q23.2-q24.2 recessive foveal hypoplasia and Pal et al., J. Med. anterior segment dysgenesis Genet. 41: 772-777 (2004) CACD 17p13 dominant central areolar Hughes et al., J. Med. choroidal dystrophy Genet. 35: 770-772 (1998) PRPF8, 17p13.3 dominant RP; protein: human Kojis et al., Am. J. PRPC8, RP13 homolog of yeast pre-mRNA Hum. Genet. 58: 347- splicing factor C8 355 (1996) AIPL1, LCA4 17p13.2 recessive Leber congenital Hanein et al., Hum. amaurosis; dominant cone-rod Mutat. 23: 306-317 dystrophy; protein: (2004) arylhydrocarbon-interacting receptor protein-like 1 GUCY2D, 17p13.1 recessive Leber congenital Hanein et al., Hum. CORD6, amaurosis; dominant cone-rod Mutat. 23: 306-317 LCA1, dystrophy; protein: retinal- (2004) RETGC, specific guanylate cyclase RETGC1 CORD5, same as dominant cone-rod dystrophy, Udar et al., Hum. Mut. RCD2 GUCY2D progressive; recessive cone-rod 21: 170-171 (2003) dystrophy CORD4 17q cone-rod dystrophy Klystra et al., UNC119, 17q11.2 dominant cone-rod dystrophy; Kobayashi et al., HRG4 protein: human homolog of C. Invest. Ophthalmol. elegans unc119 protein Vis. Sci. 41: 3268-3277 (2000) CA4, RP17 17q23.2 dominant RP; protein: carbonic Rebello et al., Proc. anhydrase IV Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101: 6617-6622 (2004) USH1G, 17q24-q25 recessive Usher syndrome; Kikkawa et al., Hum. SANS protein: human homolog of Mol. Genet. 12: 453- mouse scaffold protein containing 461 (2003) ankyrin repeats and SAM domain RGS9 17q24.1 recessive delayed cone Nishiguchi et al., adaptation; protein: regulator of Nature 427: 75-78 G-protein signalling 9 (2004) PRCD 17q25.1 recessive RP; protein: progressive Zangerl et al., rod-cone degneration protein Genomics (2006) FSCN2, RP30 17q25.3 dominant RP; dominant MD; Wada et al., Arch. protein: retinal fascin homolog 2, Ophthalmol. 121: 1613- actin bundling protein 1620 (2003) OPA4 18q12.2-q12.3 dominant optic atrophy, Kjer type Kerrison et al., Arch. Ophthalmol. 117: 805- 810 (1999) CORD1 18q21.1-q21.3 cone-rod dystrophy; de Grouchy Manhant et al., Am. J. syndrome Hum. Genet. 57: A96 (1995) R9AP 19q13.12 recessive delayed cone Nishiguchi et al., adaptation; protein: regulator of Nature 427: 75-78 G-protein signalling 9-binding (2004) protein MCDR5 19q13.31-q13.32 dominant macular dystrophy Yang et al., Science 314: 992-993 (2006) CRX, CORD2 19q13.32 dominant cone-rod dystrophy; Hanein et al., Hum. recessive, dominant and de novo Mutat. 23: 306-317 Leber congenital amaurosis; (2004) dominant RP; protein: cone-rod otx-like photoreceptor homeobox transcription factor OPA3, MGA3 19q13.32 recessive optic atrophy with Anikster et al., Am. J. ataxia and 3-methylglutaconic Hum. Genet. 69: 1218- aciduria; protein: OPA3 protein 1224 (2001) PRPF31, 19q13.42 dominant RP; protein: human Sullivan et al., Invest. PRP31, RP11 homolog of yeast pre-mRNA Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. splicing factor 31 47: 4579-4588 (2006) JAG1, AGS 20p12.2 dominant Alagille syndrome; Li et al., Nat. Genet. protein: Jagged protein 1 16: 243-251 (1997) MKKS, BBS6 20p12.2 recessive Bardet-Biedl syndrome; Beales et al., Am. J. protein: McKusick-Kaufman Hum. Genet. 68: 606- syndrome protein 616 (2001) PANK2, 20p13 recessive HARP Hartig et al., Ann. HARP, PKAN (hypoprebetalipoproteinemia, Neurol. 59: 248-256 acanthocytosis, RP, and palladial (2006) degeneration); recessive Hallervorden-Spatz syndrome; protein: pantothenate kinase 2 USH1E 21q21 recessive Usher syndrome, type 1 Chäib et al., Hum. Mol. Genet. 6: 27-31 (1997) OPA5 22q12.1-q12.3 dominant optic atrophy Rozet et al., Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 46: E-Abstract 2292 (2005) TIMP3, SFD 22q12.3 dominant Sorsby's fundus Felbor et al., Am. J. dystrophy; protein: tissue Hum. Genet. 60: 57-62 inhibitor of metalloproteinases-3 (1997) RP23 Xp22 X-linked RP Hardcastle et al., Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 41: 2080-2086 (2000) RS1, XLRS1 Xp22.13 retinoschisis; protein: Grayson et al., Hum. retinoschisin Mol. Genet. 9: 1873- 1879 (2000) (- - -) Xp21-q21 RP with mental retardation Aldred et al., Am. J. Hum. Genet. 55: 916- 922 (1994) RP6 Xp21.3-p21.2 X-linked RP Breuer et al., Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 41: S191 (2000) DMD Xp21.2-p21.1 Oregon eye disease (probably); D'Souza et al., Hum. protein: dystrophin Mol. Genet. 5: 837-842 (1995) AIED, OA2 Xp11.4-q21 Åland island eye disease Wutz et al., Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 10: 449- 456 (2002) COD4 Xp11.4-q13.1 X-linked progressive cone-rod Jalkanen et al., J. Med. dystrophy Genet. 40: 418-423 (2003) OPA2 Xp11.4-p11.2 X-linked optic atrophy Assink et al., Am. J. Hum. Genet. 61: 934- 939 (1997) NYX, CSNB1 Xp11.4 X-linked CSNB; protein: Bech-Hansen et al., nyctalopin Nat. Genet. 26: 319-323 (2000) CSNB4 same as NYX X-linked CSNB Pusch et al., Nat. Genet. 26: 324-327 (2000) RPGR, RP3 Xp11.4 X-linked RP, recessive; X-linked Bader et al., Invest. RP, dominant; X-linked CSNB; Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. X-linked cone dystrophy 1; X- 44: 1458-1463(2003) linked atrophic MD, recessive; protein: retinitis pigmentosa GTPase regulator COD1 same as RPGR X-linked cone dystrophy 1 Demirci et al., Am. J. Hum. Genet. 70: 1049- 1053 (2002) RP15 same as RPGR X-linked RP, dominant Mears et al., Am. J. Hum. Genet. 67: 1000- 1003 (2000) PRD Xp11.3-p11.23 retinal dysplasia, primary Ravia et al., Hum. Mol. Genet. 8: 1295-1297 (1993) NDP, EVR2 Xp11.3 Norrie disease; familial exudative Black et al., Hum. Mol. vitreoretinopathy; Coats disease; Genet. 11: 2021-2035 protein: Norrie disease protein (1999) CACNA1F, Xp11.23 X-linked CSNB, incomplete; Nakamura et al., Arch. CSNB2, ÅIED-like disease; severe CSNB; Ophthalmol. 121: 1028- CSNBX2 protein: L-type voltage-gated 1033 (2003) calcium channel alpha-1 subunit RP2 Xp11.23 X-linked RP; protein: novel Hardcastle et al., Am. J. XRP2 protein similar to human Hum. Genet. 64: 1210- cofactor C 1215 (1999) PGK1 Xq21.1 RP with myopathy; protein: Tonin et al., Neurol. phosphoglycerate kinase 43: 387-391 (1993) CHM Xq21.2 choroideremia; protein: van den Hurk et al., geranylgeranyl transferase Rab Hum. Mutat. 9: 110-117 escort protein 1 (1997) TIMM8A, Xq22.1 optic atrophy with deafness- Koehler et al., Proc. DDP, DDP2, dystonia syndrome; protein: inner Natl. Acad. Sci USA DFN1 mitochondrial membrane 96: 2141-1246 (1999) translocase 8 homolog A RP24 Xq26-q27 X-linked RP Gieser et al., Am. J. Hum. Genet. 63: 1439- 1447 (1998) COD2, Xq27 X-linked progressive cone Bergen et al., XLPCD dystrophy, 2 RP34 Xq28-qter X-linked RP Melamud et al., J. Med. Genet. 43: e27 (2006) OPN1LW, Xq28 deuteranopia and rare macular Ayyagari et al., Mol. GCP, CBD dystrophy in blue cone Vis. 58: 98-101 (1999) monochromacy with loss of locus control element; protein: green cone opsin OPN1MW, Xq28 protanopia and rare macular Ayyagari et al., Mol. RCP, CBP dystrophy in blue cone Vis. 58: 98-101 (1999) monochromacy with loss of locus control element; protein: red cone opsin KSS mitochondrion Kearns-Sayre syndrome including al., Science 283: 1482- retinal pigmentary degeneration; 1488 (1999) protein: several mitochondrial proteins LHON, mitochondrion Leber hereditary optic Brown et al., Am. J. MTND1, neuropathy; protein: complex I, Hum. Genet. 60: 381- MTND4, III or IV proteins 387 (1997) MTND6 MTTL1, mitochondrion macular pattern dystrophy with Bonte et al., Retina DMDF, type II diabetes and deafness; 17: 216-221 (1997) TRNL1 protein: leucine tRNA 1 (UUA/G), nt 3230-3304 MTATP6, mitochondrion RP with developmental and White et al., J. Inherit. ATP6, NARP neurological abnormalities; Leigh Metab. Dis. 22: 899-914 syndrome; LHON; protein: (1999) complex V ATPase 6 subunit, nt 8527-9207 MTTH, mitochondrion pigmentary retinopathy and Crimi et al., Neurology TRNH sensorineural hearing loss; 60: 1200-1203 (2003) protein: histidine tRNA, nt 12138-12206 MTTS2, mitochondrion RP with progressive sensorineural Mansergh et al., Am. J. TRNS2 hearing loss; protein: serine tRNA Hum. Genet. 64: 971- 2 (AGU/C), nt 12207-12265 985 (1999)

In an embodiment of the invention, suppression agents are siRNAs or shRNAs targeting human rhodopsin. Exemplary siRNAs and replacement rhodopsin sequences are provided in Table 6A.

TABLE 6A Exemplary siRNA Sequences Targeting Human Rhodopsin and Replacement Rhodopsin Sequences SEQ SEQ siRNA Target Site ID NO Replacement Site ID NO  1. TACGTCACCGTCCAGCACAAG  1 TATGTGACGGTGCAACATAA  2  2. CTCAACTACATCCTGCTCAAC  3 CTGAATTATATTTTATTGAAT  4  3. CAGCTCGTCTTCACCGTCAAG  5 CAATTGGTGTTTACGGTGAAA  6  4. ATCTATATCATGATGAACAAG  7 ATTTACATTATGATGAATAAA  8  5. GCCTACATGTTTCTGCTGATC  9 GCTTATATGTTCTTATTAATT 10  6. TACATGTTTCTGCTGATCGTG 11 TATATGTTCTTATTAATTGTC 12  7. CTGCGCACGCCTCTCAACTAC 13 TTACGGACCCCCTTGAATTAT 14  8. CGCACGCCTCTCAACTACATC 15 CGGACCCCCTTGAATTATATT 16  9. CTCAAGCCGGAGGTCAACAAC 17 TTGAAACCCGAAGTGAATAAT 18 10. CAGCTCGTCTTCACCGTCA 19 CAATTGGTGTTTACGGTGA 20 11. TACGCCAGCGTGGCATTCTAC 21 TATGCTTCTGTCGCCTTTTAC 22 12. CCAGCGTTCTTTGCCAAGA 23 CCCGCCTTTTTCGCTAAAA 24 13. GTCATCTATATCATGATGAAC 25 GTGATTTACATTATGATGAAT 26 14. AACTGCATGCTCACCACCATC 27 AATTGTATGTTGACGACGATT 28 15. ACCATCTGCTGCGGCAAGA 29 ACGATTTGTTGTGGGAAAA 30 16. GACGATGAGGCCTCTGCTA 31 GAGGACGAAGCTAGCGCCA 32 17. CACCTCTCTGCATGGATACT 33 CACGAGCTTACACGGGTATT 34 siRNAs Targeting 5′ UTR 18. AGCTCAGGCCTTCGCAGCA 35 19. CAGGCCTTCGCAGCATTCT 36 siRNAs Targeting 3′ UTR 20. TCACTTTCTTCTCCTATAA 37 21. TAGTTAATGTTGTGAATAA 38 22. GCTCCTATGTTGGTATTAA 39 23. AGTCACATAGGCTCCTTAA 40 24. GATTCTTGCTTTCTGGAAA 41 25. ACAGTAGGTGCTTAATAAA 42 26. GAACATATCTATCCTCTCA 43 27. CTGTACAGATTCTAGTTAA 44 28. TGTGAATAACATCAATTAA 45 29. CAATTAATGTAACTAGTTA 46 30. TGATTATCACCTCCTGATA 47 31. GCAGTCATCAGACCTGAAA 48 32. TGTCATCCTTACTCGAAGA 49 33. GAATTAAGCTGCCTCAGTA 50 34. GCCAGAAGCTCTAGCTTTA 51 35. AGCTCTGCCTGGAGACTAA 52 siRNAs Targeting an Intron 36. GATCTTATTTGGAGCAATA 53 37. TGGCTGTGATCCAGGAATA 54 38. GATGCATTCTTCTGCTAAA 55 39. GCAATATGCGCTTGTCTAA 56 40. TTGTCTAATTTCACAGCAA 57 41.TGTTTGTTGCATTCAATAA 58 42. CCAGAGCGCTAAGCAAATA 59 43. GTCTTGCATTTAACAGGAA 60 44. GGCTGTGATCCAGGAATAT 61 45. TGCAGGAGGAGACGCTAGA 62 46. CTTTCACTGTTAGGAATGT 63 47. TTTGGTTGATTAACTATAT 64 48. TTAACTATATGGCCACTCT 65 49. AGATGTTCGAATTCCATCA 66 siRNAs Targeting a Polymorphism 50. TCTTCACCGTCAAGGAGGTAT 67 TGTTTACGGTGAAAGAAGTAC 68

siRNA sequences 1-17 target the human rhodopsin coding sequence. siRNA sequences 18 and 19 target the human rhodopsin 5′UTR. siRNA sequences 20-35 target the human rhodopsin 3′UTR. siRNA sequences 36-49 target human rhodopsin intronic sequence. The sequence of the sense strand of the siRNA is given. Notably, siRNAs may also target a combination of these. For example, an siRNA target site may be in the 5′UTR and exon 1. Or an siRNA target site may be in the coding region and an intron. Or an siRNA target site may be in an exon and the 3′UTR. siRNA sequence 50 is an example of an siRNA that has a target site that spans Exon 3/intron 3 of the human rhodopsin gene. The site contains a known polymorphism in intron 3. If this site was used as an siRNA target, the replacement gene would have the wildtype base at the polymorphic site but degeneracy of the genetic code could be used to change other bases at the replacement site. The siRNA(s) may comprise all or part of the sequence provided. The sequences of replacement human rhodopsin nucleic acids over the target for siRNA-mediated suppression are provided for siRNA sequences 1-17. Replacement nucleic acids include at least one altered nucleotide(s) at degenerate position(s) over the siRNA target site (highlighted in bold print). Thus, replacement sequences here provide one of multiple replacement options. Some replacement constructs contain nucleotide changes in the coding sequence. These replacement constructs while altered in nucleotide sequence encode the same amino acids as the wild type rhodopsin protein. Other replacement constructs are altered at either silent or non-silent polymorphic sites. These replacement constructs encode wild type protein, with wild type function. For siRNAs targeting the UTRs or intronic sequence, no replacement constructs have been suggested because the number of base changes within the site is not limited to degenerate positions (as is the case for sequence coding for amino acids).

-   -   It is notable that suppression of a given gene such as rhodopsin         may be evaluated in a variety of animal species. The siRNA         sequences provided in Table 6B represent examples of RNAi         sequences that are homologous between porcine and human         rhodopsin. In some transgenic animal models the presence of the         human transgene enables direct evaluation of sequences that         target the human gene in that animal model. In other instances         suppressor sequences may be chosen to maximise the homology         between the human gene (for example, rhodopsin) and the         endogenous gene in the animal under evaluation.

TABLE 6B Exemplary siRNA Sequences Targeting Homologous Sequences Between Human and Porcine Rhodopsin SEQ Suppression ID Position in levels in siRNA Sequence NO: NM_000539.2 HeLa Cells P1 ACCTCTCTGCATG 414 384-403 69% GATAGT-TT P2 CATGTTCGTGGTC 415 713-732 81% CACTTC-TT

-   -   siRNA can be expressed in miR vectors using polymerase II         promoters. For this purpose pcDNA6.2-GW/EmGFP-miR from         Invitrogen is used where the cloned miR-155 gene is recombined         in order to express the choice of siRNA. The antisense strand of         the siRNA is kept intact followed by a modified terminal loop         and the sense strand, which is modified by introducing a         deletion of 2 central nucleotides in order to form an internal         loop. See Catalogue no K4936-00, Block-IT, POLII, miR RNAi         expression vector kits catalogue, Invitrogen, page 7 for figure         showing the native miR-155 sequence and the converted sequence         of siRNA-lacZ in the form of miR-lacZ.         Exemplary miRNA Sequences Targeting Human Rhodopsin:

CC miRNA oligos: Top strand: (SEQ ID NO: 416) 5′ - TGCTGCTTCTTGTGCTGGACGGTGACGTTTTGGCCACTGACTG ACGTCACCGTAGCACAAGAAG - 3′ Bottom strand: (SEQ ID NO: 417) 5′ - CCTGCTTCTTGTGCTACGGTGACGTCAGTCAGTGGCCAAAACG TCACCGTCCAGCACAAGAAGC - 3′ Q1 miRNA oligos: Top strand: (SEQ ID NO: 418) 5′ - TGCTGGTAGTAGTCGATTCCACACGAGTTTTGGCCACTGACTG ACTCGTGTGGTCGACTACTAC - 3′ Bottom strand: (SEQ ID NO: 419) 5′ - CCTGGTAGTAGTCGACCACACGAGTCAGTCAGTGGCCAAAACT CGTGTGGAATCGACTACTACC - 3′ BB miRNA oligos: Top strand: (SEQ ID NO: 420) 5′ - TGCTGGTAGAGCGTGAGGAAGTTGATGTTTTGGCCACTGACTG ACATCAACTTTCACGCTCTAC - 3′ Bottom strand: (SEQ ID NO: 421) 5′ - CCTGGTAGAGCGTGAAAGTTGATGTCAGTCAGTGGCCAAAACA TCAACTTCCTCACGCTCTACC - 3′

In an embodiment of the invention, suppression agents and replacement genes are expressed in photoreceptor cells to alleviate disease pathology. In a further embodiment, replacement nucleic acids encode a gene which when mutated may cause retinal degeneration other than retinitis pigmentosa, for example, Stargarts Syndrome, glaucoma, cod-rod dystrophy, corneal dystrophy or Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD) (Table 5).

In another aspect, the invention provides cells expressing a suppression effector such as a dsRNA, either transiently or stably, for experimental or therapeutic use. In an embodiment, the cells express an siRNA that targets rhodopsin. In another embodiment, the cells express a replacement nucleic acid expressing rhodopsin that is not targeted by the siRNA. In another embodiment, the cells comprise a vector encoding at least one or more siRNAs. In another embodiment, the cells comprise a vector encoding a replacement nucleic acid. In an additional embodiment, the cells comprise one or more vectors encoding siRNA(s) and replacement nucleic acid(s).

In another aspect, the invention provides transgenic animals and their experimental or therapeutic use. In an embodiment, the transgenic animal is a model for Retinitis Pigmentosa, for example, an animal with a mutation observed in humans such as the Pro23His and or Pro347ser mutations. In another embodiment, the transgenic animal expresses a dsRNA that targets human rhodopsin. In another embodiment, the transgenic animal expresses a replacement nucleic acid transgene that has been altered at one or more wobble position(s) such that it escapes suppression.

Suppression agents and replacement nucleic acids of the invention can be administered to cells, tissues, plants and/or animals, either separately or together. In yet another aspect administration of suppression agent and/or replacement nucleic acid may be systemic or local. In yet another aspect, administration of suppression agent and replacement nucleic acid may be used in conjunction with chemical and/or physical agents to aid administration. In another aspect, the invention provides methods for suppressing rhodopsin expression in an animal by intraocular (e.g., subretinal or intravitreal) injection of a suppression agent into the animal. In another aspect intraocular administration (e.g., subretinal injection, intravitreal) is used to administer a suppression agent and/or replacement nucleic acid to an animal. In another embodiment, ionthophoresis or electroporation is used to administer suppression agents and/or replacement nucleic acids. In another embodiment, suppression agents and/or replacement nucleic acids are administered using nanotechnology (Kawasaki and Player Nanomedicine 1(2):101-9, 2005; Silva Surg. Neurol. 67(2):113-6, 2007; Andrieu-Solar et al., Mol. Vis. 12:1334-47, 2006) or bacteria (Daudel et al., Expert Rev. Vaccines 6(1):97-110, 2007).

Suppression agents and replacement nucleic acids may be optimally combined with conserved regions A-I and/or transcription factor binding sites identified within conserved regions A-I and/or with enhancer elements and/or other regulatory elements (see Tables 1 and 2 above and Tables 9-12 below).

In one aspect of the invention, there is provided a vector for expression of a suppression agent for a disease causing gene and/or a replacement nucleic acid that is not recognized by the suppression agent, wherein the vector comprises at least one of the conserved regions selected from: conserved region B from the rhodopsin gene represented by SEQ ID NO: 93, or a variant or equivalent thereof; conserved region C from the rhodopsin gene represented by SEQ ID NO: 94, or a variant or equivalent thereof; conserved region F and G from the rhodopsin gene represented by SEQ ID NO: 97 or a variant or equivalent thereof; and conserved region A from the rhodopsin gene represented by SEQ ID NO: 92, or a variant or equivalent thereof. In a particular embodiment, the vector comprises at least one of the conserved regions selected from: conserved region B from the rhodopsin gene represented by SEQ ID NO: 93, conserved region C from the rhodopsin gene represented by SEQ ID NO: 94, conserved region F and G from the rhodopsin gene represented by SEQ ID NO: 97; and conserved region A from the rhodopsin gene represented by SEQ ID NO: 92.

In one embodiment of the invention the use of suppression and replacement constructs in combination with one or more factors to facilitate cell survival, cell viability and/or cell functioning is contemplated. In relation to neurons, a range of neurotrophic and/or neuroprotective factors may be used inter alia brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), glial derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), neurturin, ciliary derived neurotrophic factor (CNTF), nerve growth factor (NGF), fibroblast growth factors (FGF), insulin-like growth factors (IGF), pigment epithelium-derived factor (PEDG), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), thyrotrophin releasing hormone (TRH) and rod derived cone viability factor (RDCVF) amongst others. There is substantial evidence in the literature that such factors may increase cell viability and/or cell survival for a range of cell types. For example, these factors have been shown to provide beneficial effects to a wide range of neuronal cell types including, for example, photoreceptors, when delivered either in protein or DNA forms (Buch et al., Mol. Ther., 2006; 14(5):700-709). The use of GDNF to augment gene-based therapies for recessive disease has been demonstrated in mice (Buch et al., Mol. Ther., 2006; 14(5):700-709). Genes encoding neurotrophic/neuroprotective factors may be expressed from general promoters such as the CBA promoter (Buch et al., Mol. Ther., 2006; 14(5):700-709) or from tissue specific promoters. Sequences to optimise expression of neurotrophic/neuroprotective factors such as those sequences identified in Tables 1, 2, 9-13 may be included in constructs.

-   -   Sequences of a number of exemplary neurotrophic factors are         provided in FIG. 17. DNA encoding one or more neurotrophic         and/or neuroprotective factors may be utilised in conjunction         with suppression and replacement. FIG. 18 provides examples of         constructs incorporating suppression and replacement sequences         together with sequence encoding a factor promoting cell         viability and/or cell functioning such as GDNF, neurturin, CNTF         and/or RDCVF amongst others as described above. Well established         art known methods involving DNA restriction digestion, DNA         ligation into plasmids, bacterial transformation,         characterization of transfected bacterial colonies, plasmid         purification and DNA sequencing may be used to clone suppression         and replacement and neuroprotection/neurotrophic sequences into         DNA-based vectors. Examples of the design of such constructs are         provided in FIG. 18     -   Constructs incorporating suppression and replacement and         neurotrophic/neuroprotective factor(s) may be delivered using         viral and/or non-viral vectors using art known methods         (Andrieu-Soler et al., Mil. Vis., 2006; 12:1334-47). Naked DNA,         lipids, polymers, nanoparticles, electrotransfer amongst other         methods have been used to achieve gene/nucleotide delivery in         cells and animals. For example, lentiviral vectors and/or         adenoassociated viral (AAV) vectors may be used to deliver         constructs incorporating the 3 components defined above         (suppression, replacement and neurotrophism/neuroprotection).         3-component constructs in some instances may require vectors         that have significant capacity in terms of size of DNA inserts.         Many viral and non-viral vectors have been characterised that         can facilitate large DNA fragments including inter alia         lentiviral vectors and some of adenoassociated viral serotypes.         For example, AAV serotype 2 capsid 5 vectors (AAV2/5) have been         shown to accommodate 8-9 kilobases of DNA (Alberto Aurrichio;         British Society of Gene Therapy, 2008). One or more components         (suppression, replacement, neurotrophism/neuroprotection) may,         for example, in the case of AAV be cloned between the AAV ITRS         and or one or more components may be cloned into the backbone of         the plasmid used to generate AAV. FIG. 18 provides key elements         of the construct design (B). Utilisation of backbone plasmid         sequences to carry components of a multi-component construct can         be used to optimise the population of AAV vectors generated         using that plasmid. Moreover, in relation to eye disease, it is         notable that there is significant evidence that AAV2/5         transduces photoreceptor efficiently. Generation of AAV vectors         carrying suppression and replacement sequences in conjunction         with sequences encoding neurotrophic and/or neuroprotective         agents is contemplated. While AAV may be of value as a vector to         deliver 3-component constructs for some target tissues, a range         of additional viral and non-viral vectors are available for this         purpose, such as those described above, and vectors that are         well know in the art.

While utilisation of a single vector to deliver 3-component constructs involving suppression and replacement and a neurotrophic/neuroprotective sequence to a cell, a tissue and or an animal is contemplated, the use of multiple vectors in combination to deliver all 3 components is also contemplated. The multivalent approach involving suppression, replacement and neuroprotection may involve the use of 1 or more vectors for delivery. In addition, the 3 components may be delivered using a combination of a vector or vectors incorporating DNA sequences together with RNA and or dsRNA and or protein. In the current invention, delivery of protein, of RNA encoding protein and/or of DNA encoding protein or a combination thereof to achieve delivery of all 3 components, suppression, replacement and neuroprotection, is contemplated.

In another embodiment of the invention the size of the backbone of the AAV plasmid vector is either increased or decreased so as to increase expression from the virus. For example, it has been described in the art that increasing the AAV virus backbone in size such that it is larger than the insert cloned within ITSI and ITS2 favours AAV packaging of the insert over packaging of the backbone, thereby increasing expression of DNA cloned within the ITR regions (Bennet et al., Reversal of visual defects in animal models of LCA within weeks of treatment with an optimized AAV. Molecular Therapy Vol. 15, supplement 1, s286).

In a further embodiment of the invention the size of the backbone is increased with a gene which is therapeutically beneficial driven by a promoter. In this embodiment a portion of packaged AAV consists of the backbone and hence a portion of AAV particles will express the gene encoded within the backbone. In one embodiment the therapeutically beneficial gene cloned in the backbone is a neurotrophic factor such GDNF, Neurturin or others.

While the invention can be used for dominant and or polygenic disorders, it may also be practised for recessive disorders. For example, the art describes that when treating the recessive disorder phenylketonuria (PKU) with replacement genes, endogenous protein expressed from mutant genes interfered with protein from replacement genes (Described in a thesis submitted to the University of Florida in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, by Catherine Elisabeth Charron, August 2005 and entitled “Gene therapy for phenylketonuria: dominant-negative interference in a recessive disease”). Thus, suppression and replacement constructs may be targeted to recessive disorders which like PKU require suppression and replacement.

Suppression and replacement technology provides a strategy that may be applicable to a wide range of genetic disorders including disorders characterized by either a recessive, dominant, polygenic, multifactorial or a dominant negative pathology. In a further embodiment of the invention conserved regions identified in the promoter region of mammalian rhodopsin genes and/or enhancer elements and/or other regulatory elements and/or epigenetic elements such as listed in Table 5 may be combined with suppressors targeting genes with mutations other than rhodopsin and providing replacement genes other than rhodopsin. Osteogenesis imperfecta, epidermolysis bullosa, autosomal dominant early onset Alzheimer's disease, autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease, Rett syndrome, familial platelet disorder, dominant negative diabetes insipidus, autosomal dominant Stargardt like macular dystrophy, nemaline myopathy, familial pulmonary arterial hypertension, APC and p53 related cancers and several other disorders (OMIM) may potentially benefit from a suppression and replacement therapeutic approach. Triplet repeat disorders, 14 of which have been characterised to date, including Huntington's disease, spinocerebellar ataxia and myotonic dystrophy may benefit from a suppression and replacement approach. For each disorder, promoters of the endogenous gene or constitutive promoters or promotes from other genes, or inducible promoters may be used to express the suppression agent or replacement nucleic acid.

In another embodiment of the invention, promoter and/or enhancer elements and/or other regulatory elements and/or epigenetic elements may be combined with other promoters than rhodopsin in combination with suppression and/or replacement elements. For example, but not exclusively, promoter and enhancer elements can be combined with the COL1A1 and or COL1A2 and or COL7A1 and or Keratin 5 and or Keratin 14 and or peripherin and/or IMPDH1 promoters and/or genes. Depending upon the tissue in which the suppression agent and/or replacement nucleic acid is administered or active in vivo, tissue specific regulatory elements are used to enhance expression of the suppression agent and/or replacement nucleic acid.

The suppressors and/or replacement nucleic acids of the invention can be targeted to suppress and replace a gene where mutations in the gene can give rise, predispose or work in combination with other genetic factors and/or environmental factors to cause disease pathology. For example, in the case of dominant retinopathies the rhodopsin geen may be suppressed and replaced. For example, siRNAs targeting RHO- (NM_(—)000539.2) can be designed and provided commercially. Likewise control siRNAs, for example, targeting EGFP (U57608) and or other reporter genes and or other non-targeting siRNAs can be designed and sythesised. siRNAs are chosen to target sequences which differed by at least one and preferable many more nucleotides from any known gene in mouse and human databases (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast, BLASTN2.2.6, Altschul et al., Nuc Acids Res. 25: (17:3389-402, 1997). siRNAs can be cloned downstream of, for example, polymerase III promoters such as the H1 or U6 promoters to generate short hairpin RNAs (shRNAs; Brummelkamp et al., Science 296: (5567:505-3, 2001). Alternatively, polymerase II promoters which drive expression in many or all cell or tissue types including the CMV promoter, ubquitin promoter and or the β-actin promoter, for example, may be used to express shRNAs Likewise tissue specific promoters such as the rhodopsin promoter, peripherin promoter and or enolase promoter amongst others may be used to express shRNAs. shRNA sequences can be cloned into vectors with a reporter gene to facilitate monitoring expression from vectors, for example, shRNAs can be cloned in pEGFP-1 amongst other plasmids (BD Biosciences, Clontech, Palo Alto, Calif.). Suppressors can be delivered to cells, tissues and or animals with or without replacement nucleic acids.

Replacement nucleic acids with nucleotide sequence changes over the target site for siRNA-mediated suppression, for example, at degenerative nucleotides can be generated by primer directed mutagenesis and cloned into vectors such as pcDNA3.1- (Invitrogen). Replacement nucleic acids may also be modified at the UTRs and or at polymorphic sites within the target gene. Ubiquitous promoters such as the CMV promoter and or the ubiquitin promoter and or the β-actin promoter amongst others can be used to drive expression of replacement nucleic acids. Alternatively, tissue specific promoters such as the rhodopsin promoter, peripherin promoter, Col1A1 promoter, Col1A2 promoter, Col1A7 promoter, Keratin promoters and/or the enolase promoter amongst others and/or inducible promoters such as a tetracycline responsive promoter can be used to drive expression of replacement nucleic acids. Replacement human rhodopsin nucleic acids which have been altered in nucleotide sequence at degenerate positions over siRNA target sites for example, replacement nucleic acids for siRNA sequences 1-17 are provided in Table 5. Replacement nucleic acids can be delivered to cells, tissues and or animals with or without suppressor agents.

Suppression and Replacement in Cells and Tissues

Promoter driven replacement nucleic acids such as rhodopsin nucleic acids and siRNAs and/or shRNAs targeting rhodopsin can be co-transfected into cells, for example, HeLa and or Cos-7 cells amongst other cell types using art known methods. For example, 24 hours post-transfection of suppressor agents and/or replacement nucleic acids, RNA and cytoplasmic protein can be isolated from cells using well established methodologies. Additionally, suppression and replacement can be evaluated in tissues. In the case of retinal genes, for example, organotypic retinal explant cultures from mouse or rat, for example, can be prepared and maintained using art known methods and suppressor agents and or replacement nucleic acids can be delivered to organotypic cultures. For example, electroporation can be used to deliver siRNA and/or shRNA constructs and/or shRNA constructs and replacement nucleic acids to retinal explants as described in Palfi et al., Hum. Mutat. 27(3):260-8, 2006. Subsequent to electroporation of retinal explants, retinas can be treated with trypsin to expedite dissociation of cells. Retinal cell sub-populations within the dissociated cell population which have a particular feature, for example, that express a reporter gene such as EGFP can be identified. One method of identification that can be invoked is FACS (Palfi et al., Hum. Mutat. 27(3):260-8, 2006). Levels of suppression and replacement of a target gene can be evaluated in FACS isolated cell populations. For example, suppression and/or suppression and replacement can be evaluated in electroporated EGFP positive cells from retinal explants.

Evaluation of Suppression and Replacement Using RNA Assays

Suppression and replacement can be evaluated in cells, tissues and/or animals using RNA assays including real time RT-PCR, northern blotting, RNA in situ hybridisation and or RNAse protection assays. RNA expression levels of suppressors and/or of endogenous genes and or replacement nucleic acids can be assessed by real time RT-PCR using, for example, a 7300 Real Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif., USA) and using, for example, a QuantiTect SYBR Green RT-PCR kit (Qiagen Ltd). RT-PCR assays are undertaken using levels of expression of housekeeping controls such as β-actin or GAPDH, for example, for comparative purposes. Levels of RNA expression can be evaluated using sets of primers targeting the nucleic acids of interest including suppressors, target genes and/or replacements, for example, the following primers can be used for the evaluation of levels of expression of human rhodopsin, β-actin and GAPDH.

TABLE 7 PCR Primers for measuring rhodopsin, β-actin, and GAPDH SEQ ID Primer Sequence NO RHO forward 5′ CTTTCCTGATCTGCTGGGTG 3′ 69 primer RHO reverse 5′ GGCAAAGAACGCTGGGATG 3′ 70 primer β-actin forward 5′ TCACCCACACTGTGCCCATCTACGA 3′ 71 primer β-actin reverse 5′ CAGCGGAACCGCTCATTGCCAATGG 3′ 72 primer GAPDH forward 5′-CAGCCTCAAGATCATCAGCA-3′ 73 primer: GAPDH reverse 5′-CATGAGTCCTTCCACGATAC-3′ 74 primer:

Expression of replacement constructs and/or shRNAs may be confirmed, for example, by Northern blotting. RNA may also be detected by in situ hybridisations using single stranded RNA probes that have been labelled with, for example, DIG. To evaluate levels of expression of suppression agents and/or replacement nucleic acids and/or endogenous target genes, RNase protections assays can be performed using art known methods, such as that described in the Ambion mirVana™ Probe and Marker kit manual (catalogue number 1554) and the Ambion RPAIII™ Ribonuclease protection assay kit manual (catalogue number 1414). For example, RNA probes approximately 15-25 nucleotides in length specific for transcripts from, for example, an endogenous target gene and/or a suppressor and/or a replacement nucleic acid can be synthesized. For example, RNA probes targeting mouse rhodopsin and/or human rhodopsin and/or suppression agents targeting rhodopsin and/or rhodopsin replacement nucleic acids can be synthesized using companies such as Sigma-Proligo or Ambion. RNA probes and size standards can be labelled to aid visualization after separation of samples on denaturing polyacrylamide gels. For example, RNA probes and Decade™ size marker (Ambion Inc) can be 5′ end-labelled with P³²-γATP (GE Healthcare) using the mirVana™ probe and marker kit according to the manufacturer's protocol (Ambion Inc.). RNase protection assays can be performed using art known methods, for example, using the RPA III™ Ribonuclease Protection Assay Kit and the manufacturer's protocol (Ambion Inc.). Expression of suppressors and/or replacement nucleic acids and/or endogenous genes can be undertaken and determined in cells, in tissues and or in animals using, for example, the assays and associated methodologies provided above.

Evaluation of Suppression and Replacement Using Protein Assays

Suppression and replacement can be evaluated in cells, tissues and/or animals using protein assays including ELISA, western blotting and immunocytochemistry assays. ELISAs can be undertaken to evaluate levels of suppression by assessing levels of expression of a target endogenous gene and/or can be used to evaluate levels expression of replacement nucleic acids—such proteins assays are well know in the art and methods are provided in, for example, Palfi et al., Hum. Mutat. 27(3):260-8, 2006. For example, in the case of retinal genes such as the rhodopsin gene, ELISA is undertaken using a rhodopsin primary antibody which is typically used in a diluted form, for example, using a 1/10-1/10000 dilution (but possibly outside of this range) of an antibody for the target protein. In addition, Western Blotting may be undertaken to determine relative quantities of a specific protein, for example rhodopsin. Briefly, protein samples are separated using SDS-PAGE and transferred to a membrane. The membrane is incubated with generic protein (for example milk proteins) to bind to “sticky” places on the membrane. A primary antibody is added to a solution which is able to bind to its specific protein and a secondary antibody-enzyme conjugate, which recognizes the primary antibody is added to find locations where the primary antibody bound.

In addition to the protein assays referred to above, assays using antibodies in conjunction with microscopy can be used to evaluate protein levels. For example, in the case of rhodopsin immunocytochemistry (for example, using a 1/10-1:1000 dilution of a primary rhodopsin antibody) and fluorescent microscopy can be carried out as has been documented in Kiang et al., 2005 Mol. Ther. 12(3):555-61, 2005. Immunocytochemistry can be undertaken on cells and/or tissues. In the case of the retina, various modes of sectioning can be implemented to evaluate retinal sections. For example, frozen sections, agar embedded sections and/or resin embedded sections can be used. To obtain thin sections, for example of the retina, epon embedding and semi-thin sectioning can be performed using art known methods such as those provided in McNally et al., Hum. Mol. Genet. 11(9):1005-16, 2002. Immunocytochemistry may be used to evaluate suppression of a target gene and or expression of replacement nucleic acids. Additionally, histological analyses can be used to evaluate the histological effect(s) associated with the administration of suppressors and or replacement nucleic acids. In animal models of retinal degenerations such as the rho−/−, rds, rhodopsin Pro23H is, rhodopsin Pro2347Ser mice and others there is a degeneration of the photoreceptor cell layer over time. Histological analyses can be used to evaluate if this degeneration has been modulated subsequent to administration of suppression agents and/or replacement nucleic acids.

Delivery of Suppression and Replacement

Both non-viral and/or viral vectors can be used in the invention to deliver the suppression agents and/or replacement nucleic acids. For example, in the case of retina, recombinant adenoassociated virus (AAV) and more specifically AAV2/5 has previously been found to elicit efficient transduction of photoreceptor cells. Other AAV serotypes may also be used to deliver to retina, for example, AAV2/2 elicits efficient delivery to the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) as does AAV4. AAV vectors can be generated using protocols with and without helper virus. For example, a helper virus free protocol using a triple transfection approach is well documented (Xiao et al., J. Virol. 72(3):2224-32, 1998). Expression cassettes carrying suppression and/or replacement elements can be cloned into plasmids such as pAAV-MCS provided by Stratagene Inc. Suppressors and/or replacement nucleic acids are cloned between the inverted terminal repeats of AAV2 and transfected into 293 cells (Stratagene; ATACC cat no CRL-1573) with two other plasmids, hence the term triple transfection. For example, the pRep2/Cap5 plasmid (Hildinger et al., J. Virol. 75(13):6199-203, 2001) together with the pHelper plasmid (Stratagene), at, for example, a ratio of 1:1:2, can be used to generate AAV2/5 vectors. Virus can be generated using a variety of art known procedures including the method outlined below. For example, to generate virus fifty 150 mm plates of confluent HEK293 cells were transfected (50 μg DNA/plate) with polyethyleminine (Reed et al., J. Virol. Methods 138(1-2):85-98, 2006). 48 hrs post-transfection crude viral lysates were cleared (Auricchio et al., 2001) and purified by CsCl₂ gradient centrifugation (Zolotukhin et al., Gene Ther. 6(6):973-85, 1999). The AAV containing fraction was dialyzed against PBS. Genomic titres, viral particles (vp/ml), were determined by quantitative real-time PCR using art known methods (Rohr et al., J. Virol. Methods 106(1):81-8, 2002). AAVs can be generated that contain, for example, either targeting shRNAs or control shRNAs and/or replacement nucleic acids such as rhodopsin and/or reporter nucleic acids such as EGFP and/or stuffer sequences and/or sequences aiding expression of suppression agents and/or replacement nucleic acids such as promoter and/or enhancer sequences and/or other regulatory sequences and/or epigenetic elements.

Administration of Suppression and Replacement Vectors

Animal models can be used to mirror human disorders. For example, animal models of human retinopathies or that express a human retinal gene have been generated, for example, rho−/− mice (Humphries et al., Nat. Genet. 15(2):216-9, 1997), NHR+/− mice (Olsson et al., Neuron 9(5):815-30, 1992), Pro23H is mice (Olsson et al., Neuron 9(5):815-30, 1992), Pro347Ser mice (Li et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95(20):11933-8, 1998) and RHO-M mice (see below). Mice typically are maintained under specific pathogen free (SPF) housing conditions and in a controlled light environment. The suppression agents and/or replacement nucleic acids of the invention can be administered to animals either locally and/or systemically. Local administration can include direct injection to the target tissues and/or in the proximity of the target tissue as has been described in detail in the art in, for example, Xia et al. (ACS Chem. Biol. 1(3):176-83, 2004) delivered AAV vectors with shRNAs to brain to treat spinocerebellar ataxia. In the case of the retina, subretinal injection can be used to administer suppression agents and/or replacement nucleic acids according to the following procedure. For example, mice can be anaesthetised by intraperitoneal injection of Domitor and Ketalar (10 and 50 μg/g of body weight respectively). The pupils are dilated with phenylephrine and under local analgesia (amethocaine) a small puncture is made in the sclera. A micro-needle attached to a 10 μl syringe (Hamilton Company Europe) is inserted through the puncture to the subretinal space and 1-3 μl of vector is administered. For example, in the case of AAV 1-3 μl of a 10¹²⁻¹⁴ vp/ml AAV vector preparation in PBS is administered. A reverse anaesthetic (antisedan, 50 μg/g of body weight) can be applied by intraperitoneal injection post-delivery. Body temperature during the procedure is sustained using a homeothermic heating device. In addition newborn mice can be prepared for subretinal injection according to Matsuda and Cepko (Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101(1):16-22, 2004).

Assay for Function

To evaluate if suppression and/or replacement modulates the function of a target tissue and/or cell type, one or more assays may be employed that are well described in the prior art. In the case of the retina, functional assays include but are not limited to electrophysiology, such as pattern electroretinogram (ERG), full field ERG, and visual evoked potentials. In addition, visual field assessments, color vision assessments, and pupilometry may be performed. For example, electroretinography can be used to evaluate the response of the retina to light. This can be performed using, for example, the following procedure or an adapted procedure. Animals can be dark-adapted overnight and prepared for ERG under dim red light. Pupils are dilated with 1% cyclopentalate and 2.5% phenylephrine. Animals are anesthetized with ketamine and xylazine (16 and 1.6 μg/10 g body weight respectively) injected intraperitoneally. Standardized flashes of light are presented to the animal, for example a mouse, in a Ganzfeld bowl. ERG responses are recorded simultaneously from both eyes by means of contact lens electrodes (Medical Workshop, Netherlands) using 1% amethocaine as topical anesthesia. Reference and ground electrodes are positioned subcutaneously, approximately one mm from the temporal canthus and anterior to the tail respectively. Responses are analysed using a RetiScan RetiPort electrophysiology unit (Roland Consulting Gmbh). The protocol is based on that approved by the International Clinical Standards Committee for human electroretinography. Rod-isolated responses are recorded using a dim white flash (−25 dB maximal intensity where maximal flash intensity was 3 candelas/m²/s) presented in the dark-adapted state. Maximal combined rod-cone responses to the maximal intensity flash are then recorded. Following a 10 minute light adaptation to a background illumination of 30 candelas/m², cone-isolated responses are recorded to the maximal intensity flash presented initially as a single flash and subsequently as 10 Hz flickers. A-waves are measured from the baseline to the trough and b-waves from the baseline (in the case of rod-isolated responses) or from the a-wave to the trough.

The agents of the invention are administered in effective amounts. An effective amount is a dosage of the agent sufficient to provide a medically desirable result. An effective amount means that amount necessary to delay the onset of, inhibit the progression of or halt altogether the onset or progression of the particular condition or disease being treated. An effective amount may be an amount that reduces one or more signs or symptions of the disease. When administered to a subject, effective amounts will depend, of course, on the particular condition being treated; the severity of the condition; individual patient parameters including age, physical condition, size and weight, concurrent treatment, frequency of treatment, and the mode of administration. These factors are well known to those of ordinary skill in the art and can be addressed with no more than routine experimentation.

Actual dosage levels of active ingredients in the pharmaceutical compositions of the invention can be varied to obtain an amount of the agent(s) that is effective to achieve the desired therapeutic response for a particular patient, compositions, and mode of administration. The selected dosage level depends upon the activity of the particular agent, the route of administration, the severity of the condition being treated, the condition, and prior medical history of the patient being treated. However, it is within the skill of the art to start doses of the agent(s) at levels lower than required to achieve the desired therapeutic effort and to gradually increase the dosage until the desired effect is achieved.

The agents and pharmaceutical compositions of the invention can be administered to a subject by any suitable route. For example, the compositions can be administered orally, including sublingually, rectally, parenterally, intracisternally, intravaginally, intraperitoneally, topically and transdermally (as by powders, ointments, or drops), bucally, or nasally. The term “parenteral” administration as used herein refers to modes of administration other than through the gastrointestinal tract, which include intravenous, intramuscular, intraperitoneal, intrasternal, intramammary, intraocular, retrobulbar, intrapulmonary, intrathecal, subcutaneous and intraarticular injection and infusion. Surgical implantation also is contemplated, including, for example, embedding a composition of the invention in the body such as, for example, in the brain, in the abdominal cavity, under the splenic capsule, brain, or in the cornea.

Agents of the present invention also can be administered in the form of liposomes. As is known in the art, liposomes generally are derived from phospholipids or other lipid substances. Liposomes are formed by mono- or multi-lamellar hydrated liquid crystals that are dispersed in an aqueous medium. Any nontoxic, physiologically acceptable, and metabolizable lipid capable of forming liposomes can be used. The present compositions in liposome form can contain, in addition to a compound of the present invention, stabilizers, preservatives, excipients, and the like. The preferred lipids are the phospholipids and the phosphatidyl cholines (lecithins), both natural and synthetic. Methods to form liposomes are known in the art. See, for example, Prescott, Ed., Methods in Cell Biology, Volume XIV, Academic Press, New York, N.Y. (1976), p. 33, et seq.

Dosage forms for topical administration of an agent of this invention include powders, sprays, ointments, and inhalants as described herein. The agent is mixed under sterile conditions with a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier and any needed preservatives, buffers, or propellants which may be required. Ophthalmic formulations, eye ointments, powders, and solutions also are contemplated as being within the scope of this invention.

Pharmaceutical compositions of the invention for parenteral injection comprise pharmaceutically acceptable sterile aqueous or nonaqueous solutions, dispersions, suspensions, or emulsions, as well as sterile powders for reconstitution into sterile injectable solutions or dispersions just prior to use. Examples of suitable aqueous and nonaqueous carriers, diluents, solvents, or vehicles include water ethanol, polyols (such as, glycerol, propylene glycol, polyethylene glycol, and the like), and suitable mixtures thereof, vegetable oils (such, as olive oil), and injectable organic esters such as ethyl oleate. Proper fluidity can be maintained, for example, by the use of coating materials such as lecithin, by the maintenance of the required particle size in the case of dispersions, and by the use of surfactants.

These compositions also can contain adjuvants such as preservatives, wetting agents, emulsifying agents, and dispersing agents. Prevention of the action of microorganisms can be ensured by the inclusion of various antibacterial and antifungal agents, for example, paraben, chlorobutanol, phenol sorbic acid, and the like. It also may be desirable to include isotonic agents such as sugars, sodium chloride, and the like. Prolonged absorption of the injectable pharmaceutical form can be brought about by the inclusion of agents which delay absorption, such as aluminum monostearate and gelatin.

In some cases, in order to prolong the effect of the agent, it is desirable to slow the absorption of the drug from subcutaneous or intramuscular injection. This result can be accomplished by the use of a liquid suspension of crystalline or amorphous materials with poor water solubility. The rate of absorption of the agent then depends upon its rate of dissolution which, in turn, may depend upon crystal size and crystalline form. Alternatively, delayed absorption of a parenterally administered drug from is accomplished by dissolving or suspending the agent in an oil vehicle.

Injectable depot forms are made by forming microencapsule matrices of the agent in biodegradable polymers such a polylactide-polyglycolide. Depending upon the ratio of agent to polymer and the nature of the particular polymer employed, the rate of agent release can be controlled. Examples of other biodegradable polymers include poly(orthoesters) and poly(anhydrides). Depot injectable formulations also are prepared by entrapping the drug in liposomes or microemulsions which are compatible with body tissue.

The injectable formulations can be sterilized, for example, by filtration through a bacterial- or viral-retaining filter, or by incorporating sterilizing agents in the form of sterile solid compositions which can be dissolved or dispersed in sterile water or other sterile injectable medium just prior to use.

The invention provides methods for oral administration of a pharmaceutical composition of the invention. Oral solid dosage forms are described generally in Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences, 18th Ed., 1990 (Mack Publishing Co. Easton Pa. 18042) at Chapter 89. Solid dosage forms for oral administration include capsules, tablets, pills, powders, troches or lozenges, cachets, pellets, and granules. Also, liposomal or proteinoid encapsulation can be used to formulate the present compositions (as, for example, proteinoid microspheres reported in U.S. Pat. No. 4,925,673). Liposomal encapsulation may include liposomes that are derivatized with various polymers (e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,013,556). In general, the formulation includes an agent of the invention and inert ingredients which protect against degradation in the stomach and which permit release of the biologically active material in the intestine.

In such solid dosage forms, the agent is mixed with, or chemically modified to include, a least one inert, pharmaceutically acceptable excipient or carrier. The excipient or carrier preferably permits (a) inhibition of proteolysis, and (b) uptake into the blood stream from the stomach or intestine. In a most preferred embodiment, the excipient or carrier increases uptake of the agent, overall stability of the agent and/or circulation time of the agent in the body. Excipients and carriers include, for example, sodium citrate or dicalcium phosphate and/or (a) fillers or extenders such as starches, lactose, sucrose, glucose, cellulose, modified dextrans, mannitol, and silicic acid, as well as inorganic salts such as calcium triphosphate, magnesium carbonate and sodium chloride, and commercially available diluents such as FAST-FLO®, EMDEX®, STA-RX 1500®, EMCOMPRESS® and AVICEL®, (b) binders such as, for example, methylcellulose ethylcellulose, hydroxypropyhnethyl cellulose, carboxymethylcellulose, gums (e.g., alginates, acacia), gelatin, polyvinylpyrrolidone, and sucrose, (c) humectants, such as glycerol, (d) disintegrating agents, such as agar-agar, calcium carbonate, potato or tapioca starch, alginic acid, certain silicates, sodium carbonate, starch including the commercial disintegrant based on starch, EXPLOTAB®, sodium starch glycolate, AMBERLITE®, sodium carboxymethylcellulose, ultramylopectin, gelatin, orange peel, carboxymethyl cellulose, natural sponge, bentonite, insoluble cationic exchange resins, and powdered gums such as agar, karaya or tragacanth; (e) solution retarding agents such a paraffm, (f) absorption accelerators, such as quaternary ammonium compounds and fatty acids including oleic acid, linoleic acid, and linolenic acid (g) wetting agents, such as, for example, cetyl alcohol and glycerol monosterate, anionic detergent surfactants including sodium lauryl sulfate, dioctyl sodium sulfosuccinate, and dioctyl sodium sulfonate, cationic detergents, such as benzalkonium chloride or benzethonium chloride, nonionic detergents including lauromacrogol 400, polyoxyl 40 stearate, polyoxyethylene hydrogenated castor oil 10, 50 and 60, glycerol monostearate, polysorbate 40, 60, 65, and 80, sucrose fatty acid ester, methyl cellulose and carboxymethyl cellulose; (h) absorbents, such as kaolin and bentonite clay, (i) lubricants, such as talc, calcium stearate, magnesium stearate, solid polyethylene glycols, sodium lauryl sulfate, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), liquid paraffin, vegetable oils, waxes, CARBOWAX® 4000, CARBOWAX® 6000, magnesium lauryl sulfate, and mixtures thereof; (j) glidants that improve the flow properties of the drug during formulation and aid rearrangement during compression that include starch, talc, pyrogenic silica, and hydrated silicoaluminate. In the case of capsules, tablets, and pills, the dosage form also can comprise buffering agents.

Solid compositions of a similar type also can be employed as fillers in soft and hard-filled gelatin capsules, using such excipients as lactose or milk sugar, as well as high molecular weight polyethylene glycols and the like.

The solid dosage forms of tablets, dragees, capsules, pills, and granules can be prepared with coatings and shells, such as enteric coatings and other coatings well known in the pharmaceutical formulating art. They optionally can contain opacifying agents and also can be of a composition that they release the active ingredients(s) only, or preferentially, in a part of the intestinal tract, optionally, in a delayed manner. Exemplary materials include polymers having pH sensitive solubility, such as the materials available as EUDRAGIT® Examples of embedding compositions which can be used include polymeric substances and waxes.

The active compounds also can be in micro-encapsulated form, if appropriate, with one or more of the above-mentioned excipients.

Liquid dosage forms for oral administration include pharmaceutically acceptable emulsions, solutions, suspensions, syrups, and elixirs. In addition to the active compounds, the liquid dosage forms can contain inert diluents commonly used in the art, such as, for example, water or other solvents, solubilizing agents and emulsifiers, such as ethyl alcohol, isopropyl alcohol ethyl carbonate ethyl acetate, benzyl alcohol, benzyl benzoate, propylene glycol, 1,3-butylene glycol, dimethyl formamide, oils (in particular, cottonseed, groundnut, corn, germ, olive, castor, and sesame oils), glycerol, tetrahydroflirfuryl alcohol, polyethylene glycols, fatty acid esters of sorbitan, and mixtures thereof.

Besides inert diluents, the oral compositions also can include adjuvants, such as wetting agents, emulsifying and suspending agents, sweetening, coloring, flavoring, and perfuming agents. Oral compositions can be formulated and further contain an edible product, such as a beverage.

Suspensions, in addition to the agent(s), can contain suspending agents such as, for example ethoxylated isostearyl alcohols, polyoxyethylene sorbitol and sorbitan esters, microcrystalline cellulose, aluminum metahydroxide, bentonite, agar-agar, tragacanth, and mixtures thereof.

Also contemplated herein is pulmonary delivery of the agent(s) of the invention. The agent(s) is delivered to the lungs of a mammal while inhaling, thereby promoting the traversal of the lung epithelial lining to the blood stream. See, Adjei et al., Pharmaceutical Research 7:565-569 (1990); Adjei et al., International Journal of Pharmaceutics 63:135-144 (1990) (leuprolide acetate); Braquet et al., Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology 13 (suppl.5): s.143-146 (1989) (endothelin-1); Hubbard et al., Annals of Internal Medicine 3:206-212 (1989) (α1-antitrypsin); Smith et al., J. Clin. Invest. 84:1145-1146 (1989) (α1-proteinase); Oswein et al., “Aerosolization of Proteins,” Proceedings of Symposium on Respiratory Drug Delivery II, Keystone, Colo., March, 1990 (recombinant human growth hormone); Debs et al., The Journal of Immunology 140:3482-3488 (1988) (interferon-γ and tumor necrosis factor α) and Platz et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,284,656 (granulocyte colony stimulating factor).

Contemplated for use in the practice of this invention are a wide range of mechanical devices designed for pulmonary delivery of therapeutic products, including, but not limited to, nebulizers, metered dose inhalers, and powder inhalers, all of which are familiar to those skilled in the art.

Some specific examples of commercially available devices suitable for the practice of the invention are the ULTRAVENT® nebulizer, manufactured by Mallinckrodt, Inc., St. Louis, Mo.; the ACORN II® nebulizer, manufactured by Marquest Medical Products, Englewood, Colo.; the VENTOL® metered dose inhaler, manufactured by Glaxo Inc., Research Triangle Park, N.C.; and the SPINHALER® powder inhaler, manufactured by Fisons Corp., Bedford, Mass.

-   -   All such devices require the use of formulations suitable for         the dispensing of a agent(s) of the invention. Typically, each         formulation is specific to the type of device employed and can         involve the use of an appropriate propellant material, in         addition to diluents, adjuvants, and/or carriers useful in         therapy.

The composition is prepared in particulate form, preferably with an average particle size of less than 10 □m, and most preferably 0.5 to 5 □m, for most effective delivery to the distal lung.

-   -   Carriers include carbohydrates such as trehalose, mannitol,         xylitol, sucrose, lactose, and sorbitol. Other ingredients for         use in formulations may include lipids, such as DPPC, DOPE, DSPC         and DOPC, natural or synthetic surfactants, polyethylene glycol         (even apart from its use in derivatizing the inhibitor itself),         dextrans, such as cyclodextran, bile salts, and other related         enhancers, cellulose and cellulose derivatives, and amino acids.     -   Also, the use of liposomes, microcapsules or microspheres,         inclusion complexes, or other types of carriers is contemplated.

Formulations suitable for use with a nebulizer, either jet or ultrasonic, typically comprise a compound of the invention dissolved in water at a concentration of about 0.1 to 25 mg of biologically active protein per mL of solution. The formulation also can include a buffer and a simple sugar (e.g., for protein stabilization and regulation of osmotic pressure). The nebulizer formulation also can contain a surfactant to reduce or prevent surface-induced aggregation of the inhibitor composition caused by atomization of the solution in forming the aerosol.

Formulations for use with a metered-dose inhaler device generally comprise a finely divided powder containing the agent suspended in a propellant with the aid of a surfactant. The propellant can be any conventional material employed for this purpose, such as a chlorofluorocarbon, a hydrochlorofluorocarbon, a hydrofluorocarbon, or a hydrocarbon, including trichlorofluoromethane, dichlorodifluoromethane, dichlorotetrafluoroethanol, and 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane, or combinations thereof. Suitable surfactants include sorbitan trioleate and soya lecithin. Oleic acid also can be useful as a surfactant.

Formulations for dispensing from a powder inhaler device comprise a finely divided dry powder containing the agent and also can include a bulking agent, such as lactose, sorbitol, sucrose, mannitol, trehalose, or xylitol, in amounts which facilitate dispersal of the powder from the device, e.g., 50 to 90% by weight of the formulation.

Nasal delivery of the agent(s) and composition of the invention also is contemplated. Nasal delivery allows the passage of the agent or composition to the blood stream directly after administering the therapeutic product to the nose, without the necessity for deposition of the product in the lung. Formulations for nasal delivery include those with dextran or cyclodextran. Delivery via transport across other mucous membranes also is contemplated.

Compositions for rectal or vaginal administration are preferably suppositories which can be prepared by mixing the agent(s) of the invention with suitable nonirritating excipients or carriers, such as cocoa butter, polyethylene glycol, or suppository wax, which are solid at room temperature, but liquid at body temperature, and therefore melt in the rectum or vaginal cavity and release the active compound.

In order to facilitate delivery of the agent(s) across cell and/or nuclear membranes, compositions of relatively high hybrophobicity are preferred. The agent(s) can be modified in a manner which increases hydrophobicity, or the agent(s) can be encapsulated in hydrophobic carriers or solutions which result in increased hydrophobicity.

Practice of the invention will be still more fully understood from the following examples, which are presented herein for illustration only and should not be construed as limiting the invention in any way.

EXEMPLIFICATION Example 1 siRNAs Targeting Human Rhodopsin and Rhodopsin Replacement Nucleic Acids

-   -   siRNAs targeting human rhodopsin were synthesized and evaluated         for RNAi-mediated suppression (listed in Table 8). Suppression         and replacement constructs with suppressors targeting the human         rhodopsin mRNA sequence and replacement rhodopsin genes that         escape suppression by the suppressor due to subtle changes in         the sequence were subsequently designed. These changes, while         enabling replacement nucleic acids to escape suppression at         least in part, did not change the protein product expressed from         the replacement genes. Short hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) were used to         demonstrate suppression in vivo (FIG. 1). The sequence of the         sense and antisense strands of the shRNAs is the same as the         sequence used for the siRNAs. An intervening loop is included         between the sense and antisense strands in the same manner as         Brummelkamp et al., Science 296(5567):550-3, 2001. Notably, the         number of nucleotides and the make up of the nucleotides in the         intervening loop can vary. The construct(s) were delivered using         an AAV2/5 recombinant virus. Non-targeting siRNA can be used as         controls, for example, a non-targeting siRNA directed towards an         EGFP reporter gene can be used—for example.     -   siRNAs were designed according to the method of Elbashir et al.,         Nature 411(6836):494-8, 2001, or by using the HiPerformance         siRNA design algorithm (Qiagen Ltd. Crawley, UK). siRNA target         sequences differed by at least 4 nucleotides from any         non-rhodopsin sequences in mouse and human databases         (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast, BLAST2.2.6 (Altschul et al.,         Nucleic Acids Res. 25(17):3389-402, 1997). siBB, siQ1 and a         non-targeting siRNA siNT (5′ UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGU 3′; SEQ ID         NO:75) or EGFP (U57608), siEGFP (nt 256-277) were initially         cloned downstream of the H1 promoter using BglII/BamH1 and Hind         III restriction sites to generate shRNAs and subsequently in         pEGFP-1 (BD Biosciences, Clontech, Palo Alto, Calif.) using         EcoRI and Hind III sites generating shBB-EGFP, shQ1-EGFP and         shNT-EGFP (FIG. 1A). The EGFP gene enabled viral transduction to         be monitored. Six siRNAs sequences targeted the coding region of         human rhodopsin. Replacement nucleic acids were cloned into         pCDNA3.1-plasmid (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany). The CMV         promoter was replaced with either the human ubiquitin C promoter         (pUB6/V5-His, Invitrogen) or a 1.7 kb fragment of the mouse rho         promoter (rhoP). Sequence alterations were introduced into         replacement nucleic acids using primer directed PCR-based         mutagenesis using art known methods. Replacement nucleic acids         with sequence alterations over the target sites for siB, siBB,         siC, siCC, siQ1 and siQ2 were termed rB, rBB, rC, rCC, rQ1, and         rQ2. Altered nucleotides in the replacement rhodopsin sequences         are at wobble positions (highlighted in bold print). These         replacement genes were designed to avoid suppression by the         siRNAs yet encode wild type protein. Table 8 provides one         replacement example for each siRNA target site; however, in each         case there are several alternative possible replacement         sequences because some amino acids have as many as six codons         and others have four or three codons.

TABLE 8 siRNA Sequence and Replacement Rhodopsin Sequence SEQ Replacement SEQ ID rhodopsin ID Position in siRNA Sequence NO sequence NO NM_000539.2 siB TCAACTTCCTCA 75 ATAAATTTTTTGACC 76 256-277 CGCTCTA CTGTAT siBB TCACCGTCCAGC 77 CTGTATGTGACGGTG 78 254-274 ACAAGAA CAGCAC siC CGTGTGGAATCG 79 AGCTGCGGTATAGAT 80 270-292 ACTACTA TATTA siCC CGCTCAAGCCGG 81 ACCTTGAAACCCGAA 82 274-294 AGGTCAA GTGAA siQ1 TCAACTTCCTCA 83 CTGTATGTGACGGTG 84 650-670 CGCTCTACGT CAGCAC siQ2 CTCTACGTCACC 85 CTGTATGTGACGGTG 86 671-694 GTCCAGCACAA CAGCAC Suppression of RHO in HeLa Cells

-   -   RNAi-mediated suppression of RHO was initially evaluated in HeLa         cells. siRNAs targeting RHO were co-transfected with a CMV         promoter-driven wild type RHO. Transfections were carried out         three times in quadruplicate using lipofectamine 2000 to aid         transfections (Gibco-BRL). Real time RT-PCRs, performed on RNAs         extracted from transfected cells 24 hours post-transfection,         demonstrated up to 87% suppression (p<0.01, FIG. 2A) (see Table         7 for primer sequences). siRNAs siBB, siCC and siQ1 were         selected for further analysis. Similar levels of rhodopsin         protein suppression were quantified by ELISA (up to 88%, p<0.01,         FIG. 2A) and demonstrated by immunocytochemistry 24 hours         post-transfection (FIG. 2B). Subsequently, replacement RHO         constructs, rBB, rCC and rQ1, were generated incorporating         nucleotide changes at degenerate positions over the target sites         for siRNAs, siBB, siQ1 and siCC as described above and shown in         Table 8. Transfections were performed three times in         quadruplicate in HeLa cells according to art known methods as         described above. Results indicated that replacement RHO         constructs were not suppressed by corresponding siRNAs, for         example, rBB by siBB (FIG. 3). However, significant levels of         suppression were obtained with other non-corresponding siRNAs,         for example siQ1 suppressed rBB and rCC (FIG. 3).         Long Term Suppression of RHO in Retinal Explants

To provide long term RHO suppression, siBB and siQ1 were cloned as shRNAs into an EGFP expressing vector (shBB-EGFP and shQ1-EGFP, FIG. 1A). Plasmids were electroporated into retinal explants from newborn NHR+/− rho−/− mice using the methods described in Matsuda and Cepko (2004) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101: 16-22. NHR+/− mice express a wild type human RHO gene and display a wild type phenotype. Cells from retinal explants (n=6) were dissociated two weeks post-electroporation and EGFP-positive cells isolated by FACS (FIG. 4A). Real time RT-PCR was performed on RNA extracted from EGFP-positive FACS-isolated cells using the primers described in Table 8 and results obtained in explants mirrored those found in HeLa cells. Results indicated that RHO suppression of greater than 85% was achieved (p<0.001, FIG. 4B).

Long Term Suppression Using AAV Vectors

Long-term expression of therapies will be required for a progressive retinopathy such as adRP. To achieve long-term suppression in vivo, shBB-EGFP and the non-targeting shNT-EGFP were engineered into AAV vectors (AAV-shBB-EGFP and AAV-shNT-EGFP) (FIG. 1A). Recombinant AAV2/5 viruses were generated using a helper virus free system. Expression cassettes were cloned into pAAV-MCS (Stratagene, La Jolla, Calif., USA), between the inverted terminal repeats of AAV2, and transfected into HEK-293 cells (ATCC no. CRL-1573) with pRep2/Cap5 and pHelper (Stratagene), at a ratio of 1:1:2. Fifty 150 mm plates of confluent cells were transfected (50 μg DNA/plate) with polyethyleminine. Forty eight hours post-transfection crude viral lysates were cleared and purified by CsCl₂ gradient centrifugation. AAV-containing fractions were dialysed against PBS. Genomic titres, i.e., viral particles (vp/ml), were determined by quantitative real time PCR. AAVs generated contained the shBB-EGFP and shNT-EGFP constructs (AAV-shBB-EGFP and AAV-shNT-EGFP, FIG. 1A).

The EGFP gene enabled viral transduction to be monitored. Three μl of AAV-shBB-EGFP (2×1012 vp/ml) or AAV-shNT-EGFP (3×1012 vp/ml) were subretinally injected into adult NHR+/− rho−/− mice. Two weeks post-injection two animals were sacrificed and expression of the 21 nucleotide shBB shown in two retinas using RNase protection (FIG. 5A). Retinas were dissociated and EGFP-positive cells collected by FACS. RNAi-mediated suppression of RHO, as evaluated by real time RT-PCR (see Table 8 for primer sequences) two weeks post-injection (n=6), was approximately 90% (p<0.001) in AAV-shBB-EGFP-transduced photoreceptor cells (FIG. 5B). Four retinas were dissociated and significant suppression of rhodopsin protein expression was demonstrated in vivo in EGFP-positive transduced cells by immunocytochemistry (FIG. 5C).

Suppression in Transgenic Animals

A transgenic mouse expressing a sequence-modified RHO gene was generated (RHO-M). RHO-M+/− rho−/− were evaluated at two months of age for rescue of the retinal pathology present in rho−/− mice by histology (FIG. 6A-C) and ERG (FIG. 6D). Rhodopsin immunolabeling in rod outer segments and the thickness of outer nuclear layers were similar in wild type rho+/+(FIG. 6A), NHR+/− rho−/− (FIG. 6B) and RHO-M+/− rho−/− (FIG. 6C) mice. Additionally, ERG responses were similar in wild type rho+/+, rho+/−, NHR+/− rho−/− and RHO-M+/− rho−/− mice. ERG b-waves of rod-isolated responses of 500-700 μV were observed in mice of all genotypes (FIG. 6D). The amplitudes and timings of the combined rod and cone responses to the maximal intensity flash presented in the dark-adapted state, as well as the light adapted cone-isolated responses both to single flash and 10 Hz flickers, were equivalent in all the genotypes examined (data not shown). These results validate the use of the degeneracy of the genetic code to engineer codon-modified human RHO genes which can provide functional human rhodopsin protein.

AAV-Delivered Suppression and Replacement of Human RHO In Vivo

Having established shBB and shQ1 as potent suppressors and rBB and rQ1 as being refractory to their corresponding suppressors, shBB-rBB and shQ1-rQ1 were cloned into AAV vectors using the triple plasmid system detailed above and viruses containing both elements of the therapeutics were generated (AAV-shBB-rBB (also termed AAV-BB8) and AAV-shQ1-rQ1 (also termed AAV-Q1)) using the method detailed above. Three μl of AAV-shBB-rBB was subretinally injected into adult wild type rho+/+ mice (n=12) and replacement RHO mRNA expression confirmed by RT-PCR and RNase protection using RNA extracted 10 days post-injection (data not shown). To demonstrate that AAV-delivered rBB is translated into protein, 2 μl of a 1:1 mix of AAV-shBB-rBB and AAV-CMV-EGFP was subretinally injected into 10 day old rho−/− mice (n=6). Two weeks post-injection rhodopsin and EGFP protein expression were determined using fluorescent microscopy. Marked rhodopsin expression, overlapping with EGFP, was observed in transduced areas (FIG. 7).

Subsequently, 1 μl of AAV-shBB-rBB or AAV-shQ1-rQ1 was subretinally injected into newborn Pro23His+/− rho+/− mice (n=10) that present with a retinal degeneration resulting in complete loss of photoreceptors by two weeks of age. In all animals one eye was injected with therapeutic virus (either AAV-shBB-rBB or AAV-shQ1-rQ1) and the other with a control virus (AAV-EGFP). The early onset and rapid nature of the retinopathy in young Pro23H is pups precluded use of ERG as a readout for benefit. However, at ten days of age retinal histology was evaluated in semi-thin resin embedded sections cut at approximately 50 μm intervals throughout the central meridian of the eye (n=10). From each section approximately 40 measurements of ONL thickness were taken. Since only a part of the retina is transduced by a single subretinal injection of AAV (particularly in newborn pups), to identify the transduced area ONL measurements were ordered by thickness and the 15% highest and lowest values grouped for analysis. Lowest values represent thinnest ONL readings, most likely corresponding to peripheral areas of the retina and thus not in close proximity to injection sites. Highest values represent thickest ONL readings, most likely corresponding to central areas of the retina and thus in closer proximity to injection sites. Significant differences in ONL thickness between AAV-shBB-rBB- and AAV-EGFP-treated eyes were observed. The ONL of treated eyes was found to be approximately 33% (p<0.001) thicker than control injected counterparts for the highest value groupings (FIG. 8A-C). In the lowest value groupings a difference of approximately 10% was observed (FIG. 8A). These data provide evidence at the histological level that AAV2/5-delivered RNAi in conjunction with provision of a codon-modified replacement gene can beneficially modulate the retinopathy in Pro23His+/− rho−/− mice.

-   -   RNAi-mediated suppression was evaluated in retinal tissue after         sub-retinal injection of AAV vectors expressing either a         suppressor targeting rhodopsin (AAV-shBB-EGFP, AAV-shCC-EGFP and         AAV-shQ1-EGFP) or a non-targeting control (AAV-shNT-EGFP). Mice         expressing a human rhodopsin replacement gene (referred to as         RHO-M mice and detailed in the section on suppression in         transgenic animals) were subretinally injected with AAV vectors         (AAV2/5), containing shRNA sequences for BB, CC and Q1 and an         EGFP reporter gene (AAV-shBB-EGFP, AAV-shCC-EGFP and         AAV-shQ1-EGFP). The presence of the EGFP reporter gene enabled         isolation of the population of retinal cells that are EGFP         positive and therefore have received AAV using FACS to isolate         these cell populations. AAV-delivered RNAi-mediated suppression         with each suppressor (BB, CC and Q1) was evaluated using         real-time RT-PCR in cell populations characterised by FACS and         was compared to suppression obtained using AAV with         non-targeting control shRNA sequences (AAV-shNT-EGFP).         Significant rhodopsin suppression was obtained with BB and Q1         suppressors, however, significantly lower levels of suppression         were obtained with the CC suppressor (FIG. 6E). The replacement         gene in RHO-M mice was partially protected from suppression due         to the presence of two nucleotide mismatches between the CC         suppressor sequence and the target site for suppression in the         human rhodopsin replacement gene. The replacement gene is         partially protected from siRNA CC-based suppression by the         introduction of two nucleotide changes at degenerate sites in         the replacement gene. FIG. 6F illustrates depression of the ERG         response in RHO-M eyes that have received AAV-shBB-EGFP         (panel 1) or AAV-shQ1-EGFP (panel 2) when compared to eyes         subretinally injected with AAV-shNT-EGFP. The top tracing in         each panel represents the right eye which received the targeting         AAV-shRNA vector and the bottom tracing in each panel represents         the left eye which received the control non-targeting AAV-shNT         vector. In contrast no reduction/depression of the ERG was         observed in RHO-M mice subretinally injected with AAV-shCC-EGFP         (panel 3) vector; this is likely due to the reduced levels of         rhodopsin suppression observed with AAV-shCC-EGFP (see FIG. 6E         above).

Example 2 Optimization of Expression of Suppression Agents and Replacement Nucleic Acids

-   -   Expression of suppression and/or replacement vectors was         optimized by including in the vectors sequences that enhanced         and/or modulate expression levels at the RNA and/or protein         level. A list of exemplary sequence elements is provided in         Table 1, however, the enhancing and/or modulating elements of         the invention are not exclusive to this list. For example, one         or more of a promoter, a stuffer, an insulator, a silencer, a         chromatin remodelling sequence, an intron sequence, a poly         adenylation signal, a post translational regulatory element, and         a transcription factor binding site can be included in         suppression and/or replacement constructs to modulate expression         of suppression and/or replacement components relating to the         invention. Such elements and derivatives thereof can be used to         modulate levels of expression, tissue specificity, timing of         expression, and/or induction of expression. Table 9 provides         some exemplary sequences that can be used to modulate expression         of suppression and/or replacement constructs relating to the         invention. The sequences provided are within conserved regions         as evaluated by comparison of sequences from multiple species.         At any one position a nucleotide may not be conserved between         all species—the sequences represent regions where overall there         is a high degree of conservation. Such conserved sequences from         any species such as human, mouse, rat, bacteria, virus and/or         indeed a hybrid sequence from more than one species could be         used in the invention.

TABLE 9 Exemplary Enhancer Sequences CMV enhancer element amplified from pCDNA3.1 Invitrogen nt 308-734 http://www.invitrogen.com/ (SEQ ID NO: 87) CCGCGTTACATAACTTACGGTAAATGGCCCGCCTGGCTGACCGCCCAACGACCCCCG CCCATTGACGTCAATAATGACGTATGTTCCCATAGTAACGCCAATAGGGACTTTCCA TTGACGTCAATGGGTGGAGTATTTACGGTAAACTGCCCACTTGGCAGTACATCAAGT GTAT CATA TG CCAAGTACGCCCCCTATTGACGTCAATGACGGTAAATGGCCCGCCTG GCATTATGCCCAGTACATGACCTTATGGGACTTTCCTACTTGGCAGTACATCTACGTA TTAGTCATCGCTATTACCATGGTGATGCGGTTTTGGCAGTACATCAATGGGCGTGGA TAGCGGTTTGACTCACGGGGATTTCCAAGTCTCCACCCCATTGACGTCAATGGGAGT TTG TTTTGGCACC AAAATCAACG GGAC pAAV.BB11 The WPR element from pSin11 CMV GFPpre mut FL (Gene Therapy (7): 641-5 (2006)) (SEQ ID NO: 88) GAGCAT CTTACCGCCATTTATTCCCA TATTTGTTCT GTTTTTCTTG ATTTGGGTAT ACATTTAAATGTTAATAAAA CAAAATGGTG GGGCAATCAT TTACATTTTT AGGGATATGTAATTACTAGT TCAGGTGTAT TGCCACAAGA CAAACATGTT AAGAAACTTTCCCGTTATTT ACGCTCTGTT CCTGTTAATC AACCTCTGGA TTACAAAATTTGTGAAAGAT TGACTGATAT TCTTAACTAT GTTGCTCCTT TTACGCTGTGTGGATATGCT GCTTTATAGC CTCTGTATCT AGCTATTGCT TCCCGTACGGCTTTCGTTTT CTCCTCCTTG TATAAATCCT GGTTGCTGTC TCTTTTAGAGGAGTTGTGGC CCGTTGTCCG TCAACGTGGC GTGGTGTGCT CTGTGTTTGCTGACGCAACC CCCACTGGCT GGGGCATTGC CACCACCTGT CAACTCCTTTCTGGGACTTT CGCTTTCCCC CTCCCGATCG CCACGGCAGA ACTCATCGCCGCCTGCCTTG CCCGCTGCTG GACAGGGGCT AGGTTGCTGG GCACTGATAATTCCGTGGTG TTGTC pAAV.BB13 The WPR element from pBSK11 (Donello JE, et al. J. Virol. 1998 72(6): 5085-92.) (SEQ ID NO: 89) AATCAACCTCTGGATTACAAAATTTGTGAAAGATTGACTGGTATTCTTAACTATGTT GCTCCTTTTACGCTATGTGGATACGCTGCTTTAATGCCTTTGTATCATGCTATTGCTTC CCGTATGGCTTTCATTTTCTCCTCCTTGTATAAATCCTGGTTGCTGTCTCTTTATGAGG AGTTGTGGCCCGTTGTCAGGCAACGTGGCGTGGTGTGCACTGTGTTTGCTGACGCAA CCCCCACTGGTTGGGGCATTGCCACCACCTGTCAGCTCCTTTCCGGGACTTTCGCTTT CCCCCTCCCTATTGCCACGGCGGAACTCATCGCCGCCTGCCTTGCCCGCTGCTGGAC AGGGGCTCGGCTGTTGGGCACTGACAATTCCGTGGTGTTGTCGGGGAAGCTGACGTC CTTTCCATGGCTGCTCGCCTGTGTTGCCACCTGGATTCTGCGCGGGACGTCCTTCTGC TACGTCCCTTCGGCCCTCAATCCAGCGGACCTTCCTTCCCGCGGCCTGCTGCCGGCTC TGCGGCCTCTTCCGCGTCTTCGCCTTCGCCCTCAGACGAGTCGGATCTCCCTTTGGGC CGCCTCCCC (Wild type woodchuck hepatitis B virus genome sequence ACCESSION J04514)

Example 3 Comparison of Rhodopsin Genes

In addition to adding enhancing and/or modulating elements to suppression and/or replacement vectors, the rhodopsin promoter was studied in detail. A comparison of rhodopsin genes present in different mammals resulted in identification of 9 highly conserved regions in the rhodopsin gene (conserved regions A though I, Sequence 1, Table 10). Regions A, B, C and D are in the rhodopsin promoter region, conserved region E is in intron 2 of the gene and conserved regions F, G, H and I are in the 3′ region.

-   -   The following sequence (Sequence 1; Table 10) shows the         conserved regions within the mouse promoter human intronic and         exonic and 3′ sequence. Notably, conserved sequences in the         mouse promoter are nearly the same in the human rhodopsin         promoter and it is contemplated that the human or other         mammalian rhodopsin promoters and/or derivatives and/or hybrids         thereof may be used in suppression and replacement constructs.         Additionally, it is contemplated that other promoters could be         combined with some or all of conserved regions A though I and         used in suppression and/or replacement constructs, for example,         other retinal promoter sequences may be used.

TABLE 10 Conserved Regions of Rhodopsin Sequence 1: Mouse rhodopsin promoter sequence (upper case) ending at the Xho I site (highlighted in bold print), followed by the human rhodopsin 5′UTR, human rhodopsin exons and introns and human rhodopsin 3′ region sequence (lower case). Conserved regions A - I are highlighted in bold print. (SEQ ID NO: 90). GTTCCAGGGC CCAGGGGCTT CCAGCCATGA GGGCACCTAG ACTTGTAATC CCTAGAGTCC TCCTGATGCC ACTGCCCAGG GACAGACAGC ACACAGCACC CCTCCCCCAC TCTCTTAACA GGCAGAAGCA GGGAGATGGA GGCATGCTGA AGATGTCCAT GTGAGGCTGG TGGTAGCATG CCCACTGCTG GGATGAAGAG ATGGGGGCAA AGTGAGTGGC AGAGGCCAGG CCAGGTCCAG GCCCTTCCAG GCTTCCTCTG CCACTGTGGA GATGAAAGAG GGAGCCAGGC AAGGTCCAGG CCCTCCCCAC CCCCTCTGCC TCTATGGAGA TGAAGGGGGA ATGAAGAAGG GAGCCAGACA GTTGTGCCAA CACAACTCCT CCGTCGAGTG TCTAATTGCT TATGATCATG CATGCTCTCT CTCCCACTAA ACATTTATTA ATGTGTTAGG cons reg A ATTTCCATTA GCGCGTGCCT TGAACTGAAA TCATTTGCAT ATGGCTGGGA AAAAGTGGGG TGAGGGAGGA AACAGTGCCA GCTCCCCAAC AGGCGTCAAT CACAGTGACA GATCAGATGG TTTCTGGCTG GAGGCAGGGG GGCTGTCTGA GATGGCGGCA TGCATCCTTT CAGTGCATAT CACAGAAATT CAGGTGACTC CTGCTGGGAG CCAAGACCCT GAGGCTGAGC CTGGCCACAG CTCCAATAGC TGCTGGATAT CATCATGTCT GGGCTGAGCA GCCTCTAGAG GTACCCTTTT ACAGATAGTA AAACTGAGGC TCAGTGACTG CTGAGCCAAA GTTGGACCCA CCCACACTCA TTTGCAGACT GCCGTGGGCC ATGTTCTGAT CTCTTCCCTA CCTGGACTCA GCCCAGCACA CTCGGCACAC AAGGCCCTTC TTCAGCTTGA ATACAGCGTC CTCAGCTATA GCCAGCATCT ATGAATGGAG CTCAGTGACC CTGACTGGAG GAAGTTAGGA CAGGGATTTT TTCTGGAGTT TTGGCAGGAA GAGGCCAGGG TCAGGTGACT GCTGGAGCAC ACAGCTTGGT AAGACTAGTC AGGACCTGCG TCCTGAGGCT ACATGTCATA TCCACAGTAA GGAAGTGGAA GATGGGAGAT GACTGGCTGG GCCACAACCA GTGAGTGGAA TGTCCTTGTG CATCTTTGTT TCCTAACCTT CCCCTCTGTA GCTGCTGAAA CACACACACA CCCCATGCTC TGTTATGCCT CTTCCCTGGC CTGGGATTTC CATGGCTGAG GTGATGGGGC ACTGAGGCAC CGCCAGGAAA GGCTGTAACC CATCTGCTCC CCCATCCTTC ACCAGACTTC AAGCACCTAC CTAGAGCACA GGTGCAATTT TGTACCCTCC CTGTCTGGGA CCCACAGTGG TTCCTCAATG CCGGCCAACC AGACTCATAG GCCTGCCCAC AAGGCCCTTG GGGCTATCTG TCTGAGGCCT GCAGGTGCCC TCCTGGCCAC CTAGGCTCCT GTGAGACTTA GACTTCCATA GATTCTTCCT GAAAGACTAC TGAGGGCAGG AGCCCCCAAG CCTCAGGGTT AGCTTTCCTC AGCCCTGCCT CTTTGCTAGC TCCGTTTCCA CATTGAAGGC AGGGCTGAGC AGGGCAGGCG CAGCGAGGAG CTAACTGCTG CTTCTCTCTC GTTCATTTGT CTGCTGCCCT GAGACGCCAC AGCACCTAAT AAGAGCATGT TATGTGTAGC AAACATTAGG CCTGTAAGGA AGGAAAGGAG TGACGTCCCT TGACGTCCTC AGCTAGGCTG TGGTGACACA AGCAAGAGGA CTAAGCCACA GGTGAGGAGA AAGGGGGGGG GGGGTCTGCT GACCCAGCAA CACTCTTTCC cons reg B TTCTGAGGCT TAAGAGCTAT TAGCGTAGGT GACTCAGTCC CTAATCCTCC ATTCAATGCC CTGTGACTGC CCCTGCTTCT GAAGGGCCAA CATGGCTACA GCTAGCTCCA GAGACAGCTT TTCAGGGCCC CAGCATCCAA GCATCTCACA GTTCTCCACT GACCACACTC CTGTGCAGCA CTGGGCTTTT CAATGCCCCT GACTTGAAGA GAACTCAAAC TGCAGGTCAA CTAGACTCTG CAAACTTCAC CTGTGCTGGG GGTTCCTAGC CTGTGGGGAC AGTGTATCTT GAATACCTGC TGCTATGGAC CAAGAGCTGA ACACACAGAC AAACAGGCTC AGCTGGCCGG CATTCTGGAA CCACAAATGA GTGTGGATGA GCAGGAGGGC AACAAAATGG TCTGGGTGTT GTCAACACAG TCAGTAAACA ATGCACGCAG TGGGGCTGGG CCCTGATGTG GAGCTAGGTG GGGTTGGCTC TCCTTGGAAA CCTGAAGGGA GAAGGAGAGG GAGCGAGATG ATGAGGTTTA TCAGCCTGCA GAGGCAGGGG GTCAGGAAGG AGTGCCACTG TACTGACCCA GGACCTCTGT GGGACATCAA GCCATGCCAA GGAGCCATGG AGCCTCGATT GCACTGGCAG GGACAGGTTG TGATGCCCCA GAGTCCCCAG ACCCAGCAAA CAGAGGCCCA GAGTGGGAAG TGGAGCTTTC CAGGGTATCG GGGTGACTCA GAGACACAGG GTAGAATCTG CCTTGGGTGC TCACTGCCCT ATCTGAGTCC ACATGGCTCA GTCCCCAGGC CCTGTTCTCT AGTGACTGTT GCTTTGATGA GGTAGAGACA GGCAGCCCTC TTCTAAGAAC TATGTTTTGA TGGGGGACTC AGAGTTGGGG TGGGGTGGCA ATGAAATTCT GTAGACTGTG TGGTTATAAC CCTGGCTGTT ACTAGCTAGT TCTGTGACCT TGGTGACCCA CTTCAGACTC TAGGCCTCAG CCTCTGTAAG TGCAGATACA CAGCGCCAAT CAGCCGATGA CTTCTAACAA TACTCTTAAC TCACACAGAG CTTGTCTCAC TGAGCCAACA CCCTGTACCC TCAGCTCAGT GACGGCTTTC AACCTGTGGG GCTGCCTCTG TTACCCAAGT GAGAGAGGGC CAGTGCTCCC AGAGGTGACC TTGTTTGCCC ATTCTCTCCC TGGGTCAGCC AGTGTTTATC TGTTGTATAC CCAGTCCACC CTGCAGGCTC ACATCAGAGC CTAGGAGATG GCTAGTGTCC CCGCGGAGAC CACGATGAAG CTTCCCAGCT HindIII GTCTCAAGCA CAAGCTGGCT GCAGAGGCTG CTGAGGCACT GCTAGCTGGG start 1.734 kb GATGGGGGCA GGGTAGATCT GGGGCTGACC ACCAGGGTCA GAATCAGAAC CTCCACCTTG ACCTCATTAA CGCTGGTCTT AATCACCAAG CCAAGCTCCT cons reg C TAAACTGCTA GTGGCCAACT CCCAGGCCCT GACACACATA CCTGCCCTGT GTTCCCAAAC AAGACACCTG CATGGAAGGA AGGGGGTTGC TTTTCTAAGC AAACATCTAG GAATCCCGGG TGCAGTGTGA GGAGACTAGG CGAGGGAGTA CTTTAAGGGC CTCAAGGCTC AGAGAGGAAT ACTTCTTCCC TGGTTAGCCT CGTGCCTAGG CTCCAGGGTC TTTGTCCTGC CTGGATACCT ATGTGGCAAG GGGCATAGCA TTTCCCCCAC CATCAGCTCT TAGCTCAACC TTATCTTCTC GGAAAGACTG CGCAGTGTAA CAACACAGCA GAGACTTTTC TTTTGTCCCC TGTCTACCCC TGTAACTGCT ACTCAGAAGC ATCTTTCTCA CAGGGTACTG GCTTCTTGCA TCCAGAGTTT TTTGTCTCCC TCGGGCCCCC AGAATCAAAT TCTTCCTCTG GGACTCAGTG GATGTTTCAC ACACGTATCG GCCTGACAGT CATCCTGGAG CATCCTACAC AGGGGCCATC ACAGCTGCAT GTCAGAAATG CTGGCCTCAC ATCCTCAGAC ACCAGGCCTA GTGCTGGTCT TCCTCAGACT GGCGTCCCCA GCAGGCCAGT AGGATCATCT TTTAGCCTAC AGAGTTCTGA AGCCTCAGAG CCCCAGGTCC CTGGTCATCT TCTCTGCCCC TGAGATTTTT CCAAGTTGTA TGCCTTCTAG GTAAGGCAAA ACTTCTTACG CCCCTCCTCG TGGCCTCCAG GCCCCACATG CTCACCTGAA TAACCTGGCA GCCTGCTCCC TCATGCAGGG ACCACGTCCT GCTGCACCCA GCAGGCCATC CCGTCTCCAT AGCCCATGGT CATCCCTCCC TGGACAGGAA TGTGTCTCCT CCCCGGGCTG AGTCTTGCTC AAGCTAGAAG CACTCCGAAC AGGGTTATGG GCGCCTCCTC CATCTCCCAA GTGGCTGGCT TATGAATGTT TAATGTACAT GTGAGTGAAC AAATTCCAAT TGAACGCAAC AAATAGTTAT CGAGCCGCTG AGCCGGGGGG CGGGGGGTGT GAGACTGGAG GCGATGGACG GAGCTGACGG CACACACAGC TCAGATCTGT CAAGTGAGCC ATTGTCAGGG CTTGGGGACT GGATAAGTCA GGGGGTCTCC TGGGAAGAGA TGGGATAGGT GAGTTCAGGA GGAGACATTG TCAACTGGAG CCATGTGGAG AAGTGAATTT AGGGCCCAAA GGTTCCAGTC GCAGCCTGAG GCCACCAGAC TGACATGGGG AGGAATTCCC AGAGGACTCT GGGGCAGACA AGATGAGACA CCCTTTCCTT TCTTTACCTA AGGGCCTCCA CCCGATGTCA CCTTGGCCCC TCTGCAAGCC AATTAGGCCC CGGTGGCAGC AGTGGGATTA GCGTTAGTAT GATATCTCGC GGATGCTGAA TCAGCCTCTG GCTTAGGGAG AGAAGGTCAC TTTATAAGGG TCTGGGGGGG GTCAGTGCCT GGAGTTGCGC TGTGGGAGCC GTCAGTGGCT GAGCTCGCCA AGCAGCCTTG GTCTCTGTCT ACGAAGAGCC CGTGGGGCAG CCTCGAG XhoI ggatcctgag tacctctcct ccctgacctc aggcttcctc ctagtgtcac cttggcccct conserved region D cttagaagcc aattaggccc tcagtttctg cagcggggat taatatgatt atgaacaccc ccaatctccc agatgctgat tcagccagga gcttaggagg gggaggtcac tttataaggg tctggggggg tcagaaccca gagtcatcca gctggagccc tgagtggctg agctcaggcc ttcgcagcat tcttgggtgg gagcagccac gggtcagcca caagggccac agccatgaat ggcacagaag gccctaactt ctacgtgccc ttctccaatg cgacgggtgt ggtacgcagc cccttcgagt acccacagta ctacctggct gagccatggc agttctccat gctggccgcc tacatgtttc tgctgatcgt gctgggcttc cccatcaact tcctcacgct ctacgtcacc gtccagcaca agaagctgcg cacgcctctc aactacatcc tgctcaacct agccgtggct gacctcttca tggtcctagg tggcttcacc agcaccctct acacctctct gcatggatac ttcgtcttcg ggcccacagg atgcaatttg gagggcttct ttgccaccct gggcggtatg agccgggtgt gggtggggtg tgcaggagcc cgggagcatg gaggggtctg ggagagtccc gggcttggcg gtggtggctg agaggccttc tcccttctcc tgtcctgtca atgttatcca aagccctcat atattcagtc aacaaacacc attcatggtg atagccgggc tgctgtttgt gcagggctgg cactgaacac tgccttgatc ttatttggag caatatgcgc ttgtctaatt tcacagcaag aaaactgagc tgaggctcaa aggccaagtc aagcccctgc tggggcgtca cacagggacg ggtgcagagt tgagttggaa gcccgcatct atctcgggcc atgtttgcag caccaagcct ctgtttccct tggagcagct gtgctgagtc agacccaggc tgggcactga gggagagctg ggcaagccag accectectc tctgggggcc caagctcagg gtgggaagtg gattttccat tctccagtca ttgggtcttc cctgtgctgg gcaatgggct cggtcccctc tggcatcctc tgcctcccct ctcagcccct gtcctcaggt gcccctccag cctccctgcc gcgttccaag tctcctggtg ttgagaaccg caagcagccg ctctgaagca gttccttttt gctttagaat aatgtcttgc atttaacagg aaaacagatg gggtgctgca gggataacag atcccactta acagagagga aaactgaggc agggagaggg gaagagactc atttagggat gtggccaggc agcaacaaga gcctaggtct cctggctgtg atccaggaat atctctgctg agatgcagga ggagacgcta gaagcagcca ttgcaaagct gggtgacggg gagagcttac cgccagccac aagcgtctct ctgccagcct tgccctgtct cccccatgtc caggctgctg cctcggtccc attctcaggg aatctctggc cattgttggg tgtttgttgc attcaataat cacagatcac tcagttctgg ccagaaggtg ggtgtgccac ttacgggtgg ttgttctctg cagggtcagt cccagtttac aaatattgtc cctttcactg ttaggaatgt cccagtttgg ttgattaact atatggccac tctccctatg aaacttcatg gggtggtgag caggacagat gttcgaattc catcatttcc ttcttcttcc tctgggcaaa acattgcaca ttgcttcatg gctcctagga gaggccccca catgtccggg ttatttcatt tcccgagaag ggagagggag gaaggactgc caattctggg tttccaccac ctctgcattc cttcccaaca aggaactctg ccccacatta ggatgcattc ttctgctaaa cacacacaca cacacacaca cacacaacac acacacacac acacacacac acacacacac aaaactccct accgggttcc cagttcaatc ctgaccccct gatctgattc gtgtccctta tgggcccaga gcgctaagca aataacttcc cccattccct ggaatttctt tgcccagctc tcctcagcgt gtggtccctc tgccccttcc ccctcctccc agcaccaagc tctctccttc cccaaggcct cctcaaatcc ctctcccact cctggttgcc ttcctagcta ccctctccct gtctaggggg gagtgcaccc tccttaggca gtggggtctg tgctgaccgc ctgctgactg ccttgcaggt gaaattgccc tgtggtcctt ggtggtcctg gccatcgagc ggtacgtggt ggtgtgtaag cccatgagca acttccgctt cggggagaac catgccatca tgggcgttgc cttcacctgg gtcatggcgc tggcctgcgc cgcaccccca ctcgccggct ggtccaggta atggcactga gcagaaggga agaagctccg ggggctcttt gtagggtcct ccagtcagga ctcaaaccca gtagtgtctg gttccaggca ctgaccttgt atgtctcctg gcccaaatgc ccactcaggg taggggtgta gggcagaaga agaaacagac tctaatgttg ctacaagggc tggtcccatc tcctgagccc catgtcaaac conserved region E agaatccaag acatcccaac ccttcacctt ggctgtgccc ctaatcctca actaagctag gcgcaaattc caatcctctt tggtctagta ccccgggggc agccccctct aaccttgggc ctcagcagca ggggaggcca caccttccta gtgcaggtgg ccatattgtg gccccttgga actgggtccc actcagcctc taggcgattg tctcctaatg gggctgagat gagactcagt ggggacagtg gtttggacaa taggactggt gactctggtc cccagaggcc tcatgtccct ctgtctccag aaaattccca ctctcacttc cctttcctcc tcagtcttgc tagggtccat ttctacccct tgctgaattt gagcccaccc cctggacttt ttccccatct tctccaatct ggcctagttc tatcctctgg aagcagagcc gctggacgct ctgggtttcc tgaggcccgt ccactgtcac caatatcagg aaccattgcc acgtcctaat gacgtgcgct ggaagcctct agtttccaga agctgcacaa agatccctta gatactctgt gtgtccatct ttggcctgga aaatactctc accctggggc taggaagacc tcggtttgta caaacttcct caaatgcaga gcctgagggc tctccccacc tcctcaccaa ccctctgcgt ggcatagccc tagcctcagc gggcagtgga tgctggggct gggcatgcag ggagaggctg ggtggtgtca tctggtaacg cagccaccaa acaatgaagc gacactgatt ccacaaggtg catctgcatc cccatctgat ccattccatc ctgtcaccca gccatgcaga cgtttatgat ccccttttcc agggagggaa tgtgaagccc cagaaagggc cagcgctcgg cagccacctt ggctgttccc aagtccctca caggcagggt ctccctacct gcctgtcctc aggtacatcc ccgagggcct gcagtgctcg tgtggaatcg actactacac gctcaagccg gaggtcaaca acgagtcttt tgtcatctac atgttcgtgg tccacttcac catccccatg attatcatct ttttctgcta tgggcagctc gtcttcaccg tcaaggaggt acgggccggg gggtgggcgg cctcacggct ctgagggtcc agcccccagc atgcatctgc ggctcctgct ccctggagga gccatggtct ggacccgggt cccgtgtcct gcaggccgct gcccagcagc aggagtcagc caccacacag aaggcagaga aggaggtcac ccgcatggtc atcatcatgg tcatcgcttt cctgatctgc tgggtgccct acgccagcgt ggcattctac atcttcaccc accagggctc caacttcggt cccatcttca tgaccatccc agcgttcttt gccaagagcg ccgccatcta caaccctgtc atctatatca tgatgaacaa gcaggtgcct actgcgggtg ggagggcccc agtgccccag gccacaggcg ctgcctgcca aggacaagct actcccaggg caggggaggg gctccatcag ggttactggc agcagtcttg ggtcagcagt cccaatgggg agtgtgtgag aaatgcagat tcctggcccc actcagaact gctgaatctc agggtgggcc caggaacctg catttccagc aagccctcca caggtggctc agatgctcac tcaggtggga gaagctccag tcagctagtt ctggaagccc aatgtcaaag tcagaaggac ccaagtcggg aatgggatgg gccagtctcc ataaagctga ataaggagct aaaaagtctt attctgaggg gtaaaggggt aaagggttcc tcggagaggt acctccgagg ggtaaacagt tgggtaaaca gtctctgaag tcagctctgc cattttctag ctgtatggcc ctgggcaagt caatttcctt ctctgtgctt tggtttcctc atccatagaa aggtagaaag ggcaaaacac caaactcttg gattacaaga gataatttac agaacaccct tggcacacag agggcaccat gaaatgtcac gggtgacaca gcccccttgt gctcagtccc tggcatctct aggggtgagg agcgtctgcc tagcaggttc ccaccaggaa gctggatttg agtggatggg gcgctggaat cgtgaggggc agaagcaggc aaagggtcgg ggcgaacctc actaacgtgc cagttccaag cacactgtgg gcagccctgg ccctgactca agcctcttgc cttccagttc cggaactgca tgctcaccac catctgctgc ggcaagaacc cactgggtga cgatgaggcc tctgctaccg tgtccaagac ggagacgagc caggtggccc cggcctaaga cctgcctagg actctgtggc cgactatagg cgtctcccat cccctacacc ttcccccagc cacagccatc ccaccaggag cagcgcctgt gcagaatgaa cgaagtcaca taggctcctt conserved region F aatttttttt ttttttttaa gaaataatta atgaggctcc tcactcacct gggacagcct gagaagggac atccaccaag acctactgat ctggagtccc acgttcccca aggccagcgg gatgtgtgcc cctcctcctc ccaactcatc tttcaggaac acgaggattc ttgctttctg gaaaagtgtc ccagcttagg gataagtgtc tagcacagaa tggggcacac agtaggtgct conserved region G taataaatgc tggatggatg caggaaggaa tggaggaatg aatgggaagg gagaacatat ctatcctctc agaccctcgc agcagcagca actcatactt ggctaatgat atggagcagt tgtttttccc tccctgggcc tcactttctt ctcctataaa atggaaatcc cagatccctg gtcctgccga cacgcagcta ctgagaagac caaaagaggt gtgtgtgtgt ctatgtgtgt gtttcagcac tttgtaaata gcaagaagct gtacagattc tagttaatgt tgtgaataac atcaattaat gtaactagtt aattactatg attatcacct cctgatagtg aacattttga gattgggcat tcagatgatg gggtttcacc caaccttggg gcaggttttt aaaaattagc taggcatcaa ggccagacca gggctggggg ttgggctgta ggcagggaca gtcacaggaa tgcaggatgc agtcatcaga cctgaaaaaa caacactggg ggagggggac ggtgaaggcc aagttcccaa tgagggtgag attgggcctg gggtctcacc cctagtgtgg ggccccaggt cccgtgcctc cccttcccaa tgtggcctat ggagagacag gcctttctct cagcctctgg aagccacctg ctcttttgct ctagcacctg ggtcccagca tctagagcat ggagcctcta gaagccatgc tcacccgccc acatttaatt aacagctgag tccctgatgt catccttact conserved region H cgaagagctt agaaacaaag agtgggaaat tccactgggc ctaccttcct tggggatgtt catgggcccc agtttccagt ttcccttgcc agacaagccc atcttcagca gttgctagtc cattctccat tctggagaat ctgctccaaa aagctggcca catctctgag gtgtcagaat taagctgcct cagtaactgc tcccccttct ccatataagc aaagccagaa gctctagctt tacccagctc tgcctggaga ctaaggcaaa ttgggccatt aaaagctcag ctcctatgtt ggtattaacg gtggtgggtt ttgttgcttt cacactctat ccacaggata gattgaaact conserved region I gccagcttcc acctgatccc tgaccctggg atggctggat tgagcaatga gcagagccaa gcagcacaga gtcccctggg gctagaggtg gaggaggcag tcctgggaat gggaaaaacc ccaactttgg ggtcatagag gcacaggtaa cccataaaac tgcaaacaag ctt

-   -   Conserved regions A through I and some sequence flanking the         regions (5′ and 3′, were combined (Table 11, SEQ ID NO: 92         through SEQ ID NO: 99, Sequence 2). This sequence was analyzed         using MatInspector Release Professional 7.4.1 to identify other         regions that may be involved in transcriptional and/or         translational control of rhodopsin gene expression. (A small         portion of the Matinspector results are presented in Table 12).         This table illustrates some sequences within conserved regions A         through I that are thought to be involved in the transcription         and/or translation and/or stability of rhodopsin. Some of these         sequences, such as the CRX binding element in conserved region D         and the TATA box in region G are known in the art. Others, such         as the CRX binding region in E, are not. The complete set of         results from MatInspector are presented in Table 13. 302         putative transcription binding sites and/or regulatory sequences         were identified and some are highlighted in bold. On the basis         of the conserved nature of regions A though I and the important         transcription factor binding sites thought to be located within         these regions, the constructs in FIG. 9 were generated.         Construct BB16 contains conserved regions A, B, C, D, F and G.         In addition an artificial CRX-NRL element (below) was inserted         between conserved regions A and B. The components of the         artificial CRX-NRL enhancer element include the CRX motif from         conserved region D, the CRX motif from conserved region E and         NRL binding sites are underlined.

(SEQ ID NO: 91) TTTCTGCAGCGGGGATTAATATGATTATGAACACCCCCAATCTCCCAGAT GCTGATTCAGCCAGGAGGTACC

All these constructs contain transcription binding sites identified within conserved regions A though I.

-   -   Sequence 2: Conserved regions A through I in the rhodopsin gene         are highlighted in bold below. The nucleotides of these         sequences and a small section of 5′ and 3′ sequence surrounding         conserved regions have been numbered 1-1600. This sequence was         analysed with MatInspector and the nucleotide numbering system         of sequence 2 (1-1600) relates to the nucleotide numbering         system in Table 13.

TABLE 11 (Conserved regions are in bold) Conserved region A 1-210 (SEQ ID NO: 92) CACAACTCCT CCGTCGAGTG TCTAATTGCT TATGATCATG CATGCTCTCT CTCCCACTAA ACATTTATTA ATGTGTTAGG ATTTCCATTA GCGCGTGCCT TGAACTGAAA TCATTTGCAT ATGGCTGGGA AAAAGTGGGG TGAGGGAGGA AACAGTGCCA GCTCCCCAAC AGGCGTCAAT CACAGTGACA GATCAGATGG TTTCTGGCTG 210 Conserved region B 210-310 (SEQ ID NO: 93) AAGGGGGGGG GGGGTCTGCT GACCCAGCAA CACTCTTTCC TTCTGAGGCT TAAGAGCTAT TAGCGTAGGT GACTCAGTCC CTAATCCTCC ATTCAATGCC 310 Conserved region C 310-410 (SEQ ID NO: 94) GGGGCTGACC ACCAGGGTCA GAATCAGAAC CTCCACCTTG ACCTCATTAA CGCTGGTCTT AATCACCAAG CCAAGCTCCT TAAACTGCTA GTGGCCAACT 410 Conserved region D 410-690 (SEQ ID NO: 95) aggcttcctc ctagtgtcac cttggcccct cttagaagcc aattaggccc tcagtttctg cagcggggat taatatgatt atgaacaccc ccaatctccc agatgctgat tcagccagga gcttaggagg gggaggtcac tttataaggg tctggggggg tcagaaccca gagtcatcca gctggagccc tgagtggctg agctcaggcc ttcgcagcat tcttgggtgg gagcagccac gggtcagcca caagggccac agccatgaat ggcacagaag 690 Conserved region E 690-850 (SEQ ID NO: 96) tcctgagccc catgtcaaac agaatccaag acatcccaac ccttcacctt ggctgtgccc ctaatcctca actaagctag gcgcaaattc caatcctctt tggtctagta ccccgggggc agccccctct aaccttgggc ctcagcagca ggggaggcca 850 Conserved regions F and G 850-1220 (SEQ ID NO: 97) cccctacacc ttcccccagc cacagccatc ccaccaggag cagcgcctgt gcagaatgaa cgaagtcaca taggctcctt aatttttttt ttttttttaa gaaataatta atgaggctcc tcactcacct gggacagcct gagaagggac atccaccaag acctactgat ctggagtccc acgttcccca aggccagcgg gatgtgtgcc cctcctcctc ccaactcatc tttcaggaac acgaggattc ttgctttctg gaaaagtgtc ccagcttagg gataagtgtc tagcacagaa tggggcacac agtaggtgct taataaatgc tggatggatg caggaaggaa tggaggaatg aatgggaagg 1220 Conserved region H 1220 1230-1316 1330 (SEQ ID NO: 98) tctagagcat ggagcctcta gaagccatgc tcacccgccc acatttaatt aacagctgag tccctgatgt catccttact cgaagagctt agaaacaaag agtgggaaat 1330 Conserved region I 1330 1342-1425 1600 (SEQ ID NO: 99) gctctagctt tacccagctc tgcctggaga ctaaggcaaa ttgggccatt aaaagctcag ctcctatgtt ggtattaacg gtggtgggtt ttgttgcttt cacactctat ccacaggata gattgaaact gccagcttcc acctgatccc tgaccctggg atggctggat tgagcaatga gcagagccaa gcagcacaga gtcccctggg gctagaggtg gaggaggcag tcctgggaat gggaaaaacc ccaactttgg ggtcatagag 1600

TABLE 12 Conserved sequence motifs in Rhodopsin Conserved region Position Name B 288-304 CRX C 366-382 CRX D 470-486 CRX E 784-764 CRX G 1172-1177 TATA box D 500-520 Neuron-restrictive silencer factor E 794-814 Neuron-restrictive silencer factor E 831-851 Neuron-restrictive silencer factor

TABLE 13 Putative Rhodopsin Transcription Regulatory Factors Sequence (red: ci- value >60 capitals: SEQ Further Core Matrix core ID Family/matrix Information Opt. Position Str. sim. sim. sequence) NO V$PDX1/1SL1.01 Pancreatic and 0.82 14-34 (+) 1.000 0.860 tcgagtgtcTAA 100 intestinal lim- Ttgcttatg homeodomain factor V$HOMF/MSX.01 Homeodomain 0.97 18-30 (+) 1.000 0.995 gtgtcTAATtgc 101 proteins MSX-1 t and MSX-2 V$HOXF/GSH2.01 Homeodomain 0.95 19-35 (+) 1.000 0.975 tgtcTAATtgctt 102 transcription atga factor Gsh-2 V$GABF/GAGA.01 GAGA-Box 0.78 33-57 (−) 1.000 0.825 gtgggAGAGag 103 agcatgcatgatca V$FKHD/FREAC2.0 Fork head related 0.84 52-68 (+) 1.000 0.884 tcccacTAAAc 104 1 activator-2 atttat (FOXF2) V$HOXF/HOXC13. Homeodomain 0.91 58-74 (−) 1.000 0.914 acattaaTAAAt 105 01 transcription gttta factor HOXC13 V$NKXH/HMX2.02 Hmx2/Nkx5-2 0.82 58-72 (−) 0.750 0.835 attaatAAATgtt 106 homeodomain ta transcription factor V$SATB/SATB1.01 Special AT-rich 0.94 58-72 (−) 1.000 0.956 attAATAaatgtt 107 sequence-binding ta protein 1, predominantly expressed in thymocytes, binds to matrix attachment regions (MARs) V$BRNF/BRN3.02 Brn-3, POU-IV 0.89 59-77 (−) 1.000 0.892 aacacatTAATa 108 protein class aatgttt V$PDX1/PDX1.01 Pdx1 0.74 59-79 (−) 1.000 0.744 ctaacacatTAA 109 (IDX1/IPF1) Taaatgttt pancreatic and intestinal homeodomain TF V$PIT1/PIT1.01 Pit1, GHF-1 0.84 61-73 (+) 1.000 0.857 acatTTATtaatg 110 pituitary specific pou domain transcription factor V$BRNF/BRN3.02 Brn-3, POU-IV 0.89 62-80 (+) 1.000 0.893 catttatTAATgt 111 protein class gttagg V$LHXF/LMX1B.0 LIM- 0.91 62-76 (−) 1.000 0.946 acacatTAATaa 112 1 homeodomain atg transcription factor V$HOXH/MEIS1B_ Meis1b and 0.78 64-78 (−) 0.750 0.823 TAACacattaat 113 HOXA9.01 Hoxa9 form aaa heterodimeric binding complexes on target DNA V$HOXF/HOX1- Hox-1.3, 0.82 65-81 (+) 1.000 0.826 ttatTAATgtgtt 114 3.01 vertebrate agga homeobox protein V$OCT1/OCT1.04 Octamer-binding 0.80 77-91 (−) 0.846 0.866 ctAATGgaaatc 115 factor 1 cta V$HOXF/PHOX2.01 Phox2a (ARIX) 0.87 78-94 (−) 1.000 0.969 gcgcTAATgga 116 and Phox2b aatcct V$AHRR/AHRARN Aryl hydrocarbon 0.92 83-107 (+) 1.000 0.932 ttccattagcgCG 117 T.01 receptor/Arnt TGccttgaactg heterodimers V$MOKF/MOK2.02 Ribonucleopro- 0.98 85-105 (+) 1.000 0.988 ccattagcgcgtg 118 tein associated CCTTgaac zinc finger protein MOK-2 (human) V$EBOX/MYCMA MYC-MAX 0.91 87-101 (−) 1.000 0.918 aaggcaCGCGc 119 X.03 binding sites taat V$HESF/HELT.01 Hey-like bHLH- 0.91 87-101 (−) 1.000 0.947 aaggCACGcgc 120 transcriptional taat repressor V$HOMF/EN1.01 Homeobox 0.77 97-109 (+) 0.782 0.776 gccTTGAactg 121 protein engrailed aa (en-1) V$OCT1/OCT1.02 Octamer-binding 0.85 109-123 (−) 1.000 0.992 catATGCaaatg 122 factor 1 att V$OCTP/OCT1P.01 Octamer-binding 0.86 113-125 (−) 1.000 0.910 gccATATgcaa 123 factor 1, POU- at specific domain V$AIRE/AIRE.01 Autoimmune 0.86 119-145 (+) 0.916 0.862 atatggctgggaaa 124 regulator aagTGGGgtga gg V$RBPF/RBPJK.02 Mammalian 0.94 122-136 (+) 1.000 0.941 tggcTGGGaaa 125 transcriptional aagt repressor RBP- Jkappa/CBF1 V$RXRF/VDR_RX Bipartite binding 0.75 123-147 (+) 0.812 0.760 ggctgggaaaaag 126 R.06 site of tgGGGTgaggg VDR/RXR a heterodimers: 4 spacer nucleotides between the two directly repeated motifs V$NKXH/HMX3.01 H6 0.89 127-141 (+) 1.000 0.910 gggaaaAAGTg 127 homeodomain gggt HMX3/Nkx5.1 transcription factor V$CIZF/NMP4.01 NMP4 (nuclear 0.97 128-138 (+) 1.000 0.998 ggAAAAagtgg 128 matrix protein 4)/ CIZ (Cas- interacting zinc finger protein) V$EBOX/SREBP.01 Sterol regulatory 0.90 132-146 (−) 1.000 0.960 cccTCACccca 129 element binding cttt protein 1 and 2 V$RXRF/VDR_RX VDR/RXR 0.86 134-158 (+) 1.000 0.878 agtggggtgagg 130 R.02 Vitamin D GAGGaaacagt receptor RXR gc heterodimer site V$ETSF/PU1.01 Pu.1 (Pu120) Ets- 0.89 141-157 (+) 1.000 0.895 tgagggaGGAA 131 like transcription acagtg factor identified in lymphoid B- cells V$NFAT/NFAT.01 Nuclear factor of 0.95 145-155 (+) 1.000 0.989 ggaGGAAaca 132 activated T-cells g V$AREB/AREB6.04 AREB6 (Atp1a1 0.98 146-158 (−) 1.000 0.991 gcactGTTTcct 133 regulatory c element binding factor 6) V$COMP/COMP1.0 COMP1, 0.77 163-185 (−) 1.000 0.811 ctgtgATTGacg 134 1 cooperates with cctgttgggga myogenic proteins in multicomponent complex V$PAX6/PAX6.01 Pax-6 paired 0.77 163-181 (−) 0.808 0.781 gaTTGAcgcct 135 domain binding gttgggga site V$MYBL/CMYB.01 c-Myb, important 0.90 165-177 (+) 1.000 0.945 ccCAACaggcg 136 in hematopoesis, tc cellular equivalent to avian myoblastosis virus oncogene v-myb V$CREB/CREB.02 cAMP- 0.89 167-187 (−) 1.000 0.902 cactgtgatTGA 137 responsive Cgcctgttg element binding protein V$WHZF/WHN.01 Winged helix 0.95 169-179 (−) 1.000 0.955 ttgACGCctgt 138 protein, involved in hair keratinization and thymus epithelium differentiation V$HOXC/PBX1.01 Homeo domain 0.78 170-186 (−) 1.000 0.840 actgtGATTgac 139 factor Pbx-1 gcctg V$PBXC/PBX1_ME Binding site for a 0.77 170-186 (−) 1.000 0.875 actgTGATtgac 140 IS1.02 Pbx1/Meis1 gcctg heterodimer V$AP1R/TCF11MA TCF11/MafG 0.81 177-201 (+) 1.000 0.838 caatcacagTGA 141 FG.01 heterodimers, Cagatcagatggt binding to subclass of AP1 sites V$TALE/MEIS1.01 Binding site for 0.95 183-193 (−) 1.000 0.971 atcTGTCactg 142 monomeric Meis1 homeodomain protein V$HOXH/MEIS1A_ Meis1a and 0.77 186-200 (+) 1.000 0.770 TGACagatcag 143 HOXA9.01 Hoxa9 form atgg heterodimeric binding complexes on target DNA V$GATA/GATA3.0 GATA-binding 0.91 187-199 (+) 1.000 0.950 gacAGATcaga 144 2 factor 3 tg V$AP4R/TAL1BET Tal-1beta/E47 0.87 189-205 (+) 1.000 0.955 cagatCAGAtg 145 AE47.01 heterodimer gtttct V$NEUR/NEUROG. Neurogenin 1 0.92 191-203 (−) 1.000 0.925 aaaCCATctgat 146 01 and 3 (ngn1/3) c binding sites V$ZBPF/ZBP89.01 Zinc finger 0.93 205-227 (−) 1.000 0.966 agacccccccCC 147 transcription CCcttcagcca factor ZBP-89 V$ZBPF/ZNF219.01 Kruppel-like zinc 0.91 207-229 (−) 1.000 0.997 gcagaccCCCC 148 finger protein ccccccttcagc 219 V$INSM/INSM1.01 Zinc finger 0.90 209- (+) 1.000 0.914 tgaagGGGGgg 149 protein 221nc gg insulinoma- associated 1 (IA- 1) functions as a transcriptional repressor V$EKLF/KKLF.01 Kidney-enriched 0.91 210- (+) 1.000 0.934 gaagggGGGG 150 kruppel-like 226nc gggggtc factor, KLF15 V$EGRF/WT1.01 Wilms Tumor 0.92 211- (+) 0.837 0.945 aagggGGGGg 151 Suppressor 227nc ggggtct V$SP1F/GC.01 GC box elements 0.88 211- (+) 0.819 0.897 aagggGGGGg 152 225nc ggggt V$EKLF/KKLF.01 Kidney-enriched 0.91 212- (+) 1.000 0.949 agggggGGGG 153 kruppel-like 228nc gggtctg factor, KLF15 V$SP1F/GC.01 GC box elements 0.88 213- (+) 0.819 0.908 gggggGGGGg 154 227nc ggtct V$EGRF/WT1.01 Wilms Tumor 0.92 214- (+) 0.837 0.932 gggggGGGGg 155 Suppressor 230nc gtctgct V$GLIF/ZIC2.01 Zinc finger 0.89 214-228 (−) 1.000 0.967 cagacccCCCC 156 transcription cccc factor, Zic family member 2 (odd- paired homolog, Drosophila) V$MAZF/MAZR.01 MYC-associated 0.88 215- (+) 1.000 0.972 ggggggGGGG 157 zinc finger 227nc tct protein related transcription factor V$AP1R/BACH2.01 Bach2 bound 0.89 221-245 (−) 0.813 0.897 gagtgttgcTGG 158 TRE Gtcagcagacccc V$AP1R/VMAF.01 v-Maf 0.82 221-245 (+) 1.000 0.957 ggggtctgcTGA 159 Cccagcaacactc V$XBBF/MIF1.01 MIBP-1/RFX1 0.76 225-243 (−) 0.800 0.778 gtgttgctggGTC 160 complex Agcaga V$XBBF/RFX1.01 X-box binding 0.89 227-245 (+) 1.000 0.907 tgctgacccaGC 161 protein RFX1 AAcactc V$NFAT/NFAT.01 Nuclear factor of 0.95 243-253 (−) 1.000 0.971 gaaGGAAaga 162 activated T-cells g V$NKXH/HMX2.01 Hmx2/Nkx5-2 0.83 253-267 (−) 1.000 0.911 gctCTTAagcct 163 homeodomain cag transcription factor V$PAX8/PAX8.01 PAX 2/5/8 0.88 254-266 (−) 0.800 0.901 ctcTTAAgcctc 164 binding site a V$NKXH/HMX2.01 Hmx2/Nkx5-2 0.83 256-270 (+) 1.000 0.931 aggCTTAagag 165 homeodomain ctat transcription factor V$HOXF/PHOX2.01 Phox2a (ARIX) 0.87 260-276 (−) 1.000 0.898 acgcTAATagc 166 and Phox2b tcttaa V$CLOX/CDPCR3. Cut-like 0.73 266-284 (−) 0.880 0.770 agtcacctacgcta 167 01 homeodomain ATAGc protein V$EGRF/NGFIC.01 Nerve growth 0.80 269-285 (+) 1.000 0.855 attaGCGTaggt 168 factor-induced gactc protein C V$AP1R/BACH2.01 Bach2 bound 0.89 271-295 (−) 1.000 0.957 attagggacTGA 169 TRE Gtcacctacgcta V$CREB/TAXCRE Tax/CREB 0.71 274-294 (+) 1.000 0.744 cgtaggTGACtc 170 B.02 complex agtccctaa V$AP1F/AP1.01 Activator protein 0.94 278-288 (+) 0.904 0.967 ggtgACTCagt 171 1 V$AP1F/AP1.03 Activator protein 0.94 278-288 (−) 1.000 0.976 acTGAGtcacc 172 1 V$HOXF/CRX.01 Cone-rod B 0.94 288-304 (+) 1.000 0.972 tcccTAATcctc 173 homeobox- cattc containing transcription factor/otx-like homeobox gene V$SORY/HBP1.01 HMG box- 0.86 298-310 (−) 1.000 0.905 ggcattgAATG 174 containing ga protein 1 V$IRFF/IRF7.01 Interferon 0.86 329-347 (+) 0.936 0.865 caGAATcagaa 175 regulatory factor cctccacc 7 (IRF-7) V$RORA/RORA1.0 RAR-related 0.93 342-360 (−) 1.000 0.953 ttaatgaGGTCa 176 1 orphan receptor aggtgga alpha1 V$CSEN/DREAM.0 Downstream 0.95 344-354 (−) 1.000 0.960 agGTCAaggtg 177 1 regulatory element- antagonist modulator, Ca2+-binding protein of the neuronal calcium sensors family that binds DRE (downstream regulatory element) sites as a tetramer V$E4FF/E4F.01 GLI-Krueppel- 0.82 345-357 (−) 0.789 0.824 atgAGGTcaag 178 related gt transcription factor, regulator of adenovirus E4 promoter V$HOXF/BARX2.0 Barx2, 0.95 347-363 (−) 1.000 0.980 gcgtTAATgag 179 1 homeobox gtcaag transcription factor that preferentially binds to paired TAAT motifs V$MYBL/VMYB.04 v-Myb, AMV v- 0.85 356-368 (+) 1.000 0.881 attAACGctggt 180 myb c V$HOXF/CRX.01 Cone-rod (C) 0.94 366-382 (+) 1.000 0.962 gtctTAATcacc 181 homeobox- aagcc containing transcription factor/otx-like homeobox gene V$RCAT/CLTR_CA Mammalian C- 0.71 375-399 (+) 1.000 0.718 aCCAAgccaag 182 AT.01 type LTR ctccttaaactgct CCAAT box V$ETSF/ETS1.01 c-Ets-1 binding 0.92 409-425 (−) 1.000 0.921 actaggaGGAA 183 site gcctag V$SF1F/FTF.01 Alpha (1)- 0.94 426-438 (−) 1.000 0.940 gggcCAAGgtg 184 fetoprotein ac transcription factor (FTF), liver receptor homologue-1 (LRH-1) V$BCL6/BCL6.02 POZ/zinc finger 0.77 436-452 (+) 1.000 0.785 cccctctTAGAa 185 protein, gccaa transcriptional repressor, translocations observed in diffuse large cell lymphoma V$HOXF/GSH2.01 Homeodomain 0.95 443-459 (−) 1.000 1.000 ggccTAATtgg 186 transcription cttcta factor Gsh-2 V$CAAT/CAAT.01 Cellular and viral 0.90 445-459 (+) 1.000 0.949 gaagCCAAtta 187 CCAAT box ggcc V$NKXH/NKX25.0 Homeo domain 0.88 446-460 (−) 1.000 0.938 gggccTAATtg 188 2 factor Nkx- gctt 2.5/Csx, tinman homolog low affinity sites V$HOMF/S8.01 Binding site for 0.97 448-460 (−) 1.000 0.999 gggccTAATtg 189 S8 type gc homeodomains V$HOXF/CRX.01 Cone-rod (D) 0.94 470-486 (−) 1.000 0.985 atatTAATcccc 190 homeobox- gctgc containing transcription factor/otx-like homeobox gene V$MZF1/MZF1.01 Myeloid zinc 0.99 473-481 (+) 1.000 0.991 gcGGGGatt 191 finger protein MZF1 V$OCTB/TST1.01 POU-factor Tst- 0.90 475-487 (+) 1.000 0.947 ggggATTAatat 192 1/Oct-6 g V$CART/CART1.01 Cart-1 (cartilage 0.86 477-493 (−) 1.000 0.926 caTAATcatatt 193 homeoprotein 1) aatcc V$CART/CART1.01 Cart-1 (cartilage 0.86 479-495 (+) 1.000 0.914 atTAATatgatta 194 homeoprotein 1) tgaa V$SATB/SATB1.01 Special AT-rich 0.94 479-493 (+) 1.000 0.957 attAATAtgatta 195 sequence-binding tg protein 1, predominantly expressed in thymocytes, binds to matrix attachment regions (MARs) V$PDX1/PDX1.01 Pdx1 0.74 480-500 (+) 0.826 0.775 ttaatatgaTTAT 196 (IDX1/IPF1) gaacaccc pancreatic and intestinal homeodomain TF V$GLIF/ZIC2.01 Zinc finger 0.89 491-505 (+) 1.000 0.932 atgaacaCCCCc 197 transcription aat factor, Zic family member 2 (odd- paired homolog, Drosophila) V$CAAT/ACAAT.0 Avian C-type 0.83 497-511 (+) 1.000 0.905 acccCCAAtctc 198 1 LTR CCAAT cca box V$RREB/RREB1.01 Ras-responsive 0.80 499-513 (+) 1.000 0.841 cCCCAatctccc 199 element binding aga protein 1 V$NRSF/NRSF.01 Neuron- 0.69 500-520 (−) 1.000 0.696 atcAGCAtctgg 200 restrictive gagattggg silencer factor V$IKRS/LYF1.01 LyF-1 (Ikaros 1), 0.98 502-514 (−) 1.000 1.000 atcTGGGagatt 201 enriched in B and g T lymphocytes V$AP4R/TAL1 ALP Tal-1 alpha/E47 0.87 505-521 (+) 1.000 0.905 tctccCAGAtgc 202 HAE47.01 heterodimer tgatt V$RP58/RP58.01 Zinc finger 0.84 507-519 (−) 1.000 0.865 tcagCATCtggg 203 protein RP58 a (ZNF238), associated preferentially with heterochromatin V$AP1R/NFE2.01 NF-E2 p45 0.85 508-532 (+) 1.000 0.904 cccagatgCTG 204 Attcagccaggag c V$AP1R/NFL2.01 NF-E2 p45 0.85 508-532 (−) 1.000 0.882 gctcctggCTGA 205 atcagcatctggg V$BEL1/BEL1.01 Bel-1 similar 0.81 510-532 (−) 1.000 0.818 gctcctggctgaaT 206 region (defined CAGcatctg in Lentivirus LTRs) V$NRLF/NRL.01 Neural retinal 0.85 511-529 (−) 1.000 0.991 cctggCTGAatc 207 basic leucine agcatct zipper factor (bZIP) V$AP1F/AP1.03 Activator protein 0.94 515-525 (+) 0.885 0.970 gcTGATtcagc 208 1 V$AP1F/AP1.03 Activator protein 0.94 515-525 (−) 0.857 0.963 gcTGAAtcagc 209 1 V$HOXF/PTX1.01 Pituitary 0.94 523-539 (−) 1.000 0.944 ctcCTAAgctcc 210 Homeobox 1 tggct (Ptx1, Pitx-1) V$ZBPF/ZNF219.01 Kruppel-like zinc 0.91 528-550 (−) 1.000 0.926 gtgacctCCCCc 211 finger protein tcctaagctcc 219 V$RXRF/VDR_RX VDR/RXR 0.85 531-555 (+) 1.000 0.889 gcttaggaggggG 212 R.01 Vitamin D AGGtcactttat receptor RXR heterodimer site V$ZBPF/ZBP89.01 Zinc finger 0.93 531-553 (−) 1.000 0.958 aaagtgacctCC 213 transcription CCctcctaagc factor ZBP-89 V$EKLF/KKLF.01 Kidney-enriched 0.91 534-550 (+) 1.000 0.913 taggagGGGGa 214 kruppel-like ggtcac factor, KLF15 V$GLIF/ZIC2.01 Zinc finger 0.89 536-550 (−) 1.000 0.945 gtgacctCCCCc 215 transcription tcc factor, Zic family member 2 (odd- paired homolog, Drosophila) V$RORA/TR2.01 Nuclear hormone 0.92 538-556 (+) 1.000 0.950 agggggaGGTC 216 receptor TR2, actttata half site V$TBPF/TATA.01 Cellular and viral 0.90 543-559 (−) 1.000 0.915 ccttaTAAAgtg 217 TATA box acctc elements V$SRFF/SRF.01 Serum response 0.66 545-563 (−) 1.000 0.722 agaccctTATAa 218 factor agtgacc V$SRFF/SRF.01 Serum response 0.66 546-564 (+) 1.000 0.712 gtcacttTATAa 219 factor gggtctg V$TBPF/LTATA.01 Lentivirus LTR 0.82 550-566 (+) 1.000 0.829 cttTATAagggt 220 TATA box ctggg V$MOKF/MOK2.01 Ribonucleopro- 0.74 552-572 (−) 1.000 0.772 gacccccccagac 221 tein associated CCTTataa zinc finger protein MOK-2 (mouse) V$ZBPF/ZNF219.01 Kruppel-like zinc 0.91 553-575 (−) 1.000 0.948 tctgaccCCCCc 222 finger protein agacccttata 219 V$GLIF/ZIC2.01 Zinc finger 0.89 560-574 (−) 1.000 0.967 ctgacccCCCCa 223 transcription gac factor, Zic family member 2 (odd- paired homolog, Drosophila) V$MAZF/MAZR.01 MYC-associated 0.88 561-573 (+) 1.000 0.919 tctgggGGGGtc 224 zinc finger a protein related transcription factor V$ZNFP/SZF1.01 SZF1, 0.82 579-603 (−) 0.801 0.829 tcaGGGCtccag 225 hematopoietic ctggatgactctg progenitor- restricted KRAB- zinc finger protein V$AP4R/AP4.01 Activator protein 0.85 584- (+) 1.000 0.916 tcatcCAGCtgg 226 4 600UTR agccc V$EBOX/ATF6.01 Member of b-zip 0.93 596-610 (−) 1.000 0.970 cagCCACtcag 227 family, induced ggct by ER damage/stress, binds to the ERSE in association with NF-Y V$CAAT/CAAT.01 Cellular and viral 0.90 597-611 (−) 0.826 0.937 tcagCCACtcag 228 CCAAT box ggc V$HEAT/HSF1.01 Heat shock factor 0.84 621-645 (−) 1.000 0.857 tgctcccacccaA 229 1 GAAtgctgcgaa V$OAZF/ROAZ.01 Rat C2H2 Zn 0.73 625-641 (+) 0.750 0.779 caGCATtcttgg 230 finger protein gtggg involved in olfactory neuronal differentiation V$OAZF/ROAZ.01 Rat C2H2 Zn 0.73 626- (−) 0.750 0.744 tcCCACccaag 231 finger protein 642nc aatgct involved in olfactory neuronal differentiation V$EGRF/EGR2.01 Egr-2/Krox-20 0.79 631- (+) 0.766 0.828 tcttGGGTggga 232 early growth 647UTR gcagc response gene product V$EGRF/WT1.01 Wilms Tumor 0.92 633-649 (+) 1.000 0.930 ttgggTGGGag 233 Suppressor cagcca V$RBPF/RBPJK.01 Mammalian 0.84 634- (+) 1.000 0.847 tgggTGGGagc 234 transcriptional 648UTR agcc repressor RBP- Jkappa/CBF1 V$OAZF/ROAZ.01 Rat C2H2 Zn 0.73 641-657 (+) 0.750 0.818 gaGCAGccacg 235 finger protein ggtcag involved in olfactory neuronal differentiation V$EBOX/USF.03 Upstream 0.89 643-657 (−) 1.000 0.904 ctgaccCGTGg 236 stimulating factor ctgc V$EBOX/MYCMA MYC-MAX 0.91 644-658 (+) 0.842 0.919 cagccaCGGGt 237 X.03 binding sites cagc V$PAX5/PAX5.03 PAXS paired 0.80 659- (+) 0.894 0.833 cacaagggCCA 238 domain protein 687gen Cagccatgaatgg cacag V$CLOX/CDPCR3. Cut-like 0.73 665- (+) 1.000 0.735 ggccacagccatg 239 01 homeodomain 683gen aATGGc protein V$PAX5/PAX5.03 PAX5 paired 0.80 674- (+) 1.000 0.800 catgaatgGCAC 240 domain protein 702gen agaagtcctgagcc cca V$ZNFP/ZBRK1.01 Transcription 0.77 680-704 (−) 0.813 0.847 catggggcTCA 241 factor with 8 Ggacttctgtgcca central zinc fingers and an N- terminal KRAB domain V$PBXC/PBX1_ME Binding site for a 0.77 699-715 (−) 0.750 0.860 attcTGTTtgaca 242 IS1.02 Pbx1/Meis1 tggg heterodimer V$TALE/TGIF.01 TG-interacting 1.00 700- (+) 1.000 1.000 ccatGTCAaac 243 factor belonging 710nc to TALE class of homeodomain factors V$SNAP/PSE.02 Proximal 0.73 745-763 (+) 1.000 0.734 gtgccCCTAatc 244 sequence element ctcaact (PSE) of RNA polymerase III- transcribed genes V$HOXF/CRX.01 Cone-rod (E) 0.94 748-764 (+) 1.000 0.965 ccccTAATcctc 245 homeobox- aacta containing transcription factor/otx-like homeobox gene V$FAST/FAST1.01 FAST-1 SMAD 0.81 749-763 (−) 0.983 0.829 agttgagGATTa 246 interacting ggg protein V$NR2F/HPF1.01 HepG2-specific 0.78 767-787 (+) 0.750 0.801 ctaggcgcAAA 247 P450 2C factor-1 Ttccaatcct V$SORY/HMGIY.0 HMGI(Y) high- 0.92 770-782 (−) 1.000 0.938 tggAATTtgcgc 248 1 mobility-group c protein I (Y), architectural transcription factor organizing the framework of a nuclear protein- DNA transcriptional complex V$HMTB/MTBF.01 Muscle-specific 0.90 774-782 (−) 1.000 0.953 tggaATTTg 249 Mt binding site V$LEFF/LEF1.01 TCF/LEF-1, 0.86 783-799 (−) 1.000 0.889 actagacCAAA 250 involved in the gaggat Wnt signal transduction pathway V$NRSF/NRSE.01 Neural- 0.67 794- (+) 0.782 0.762 tctagtacccCGG 251 restrictive- 814nc Gggcagcc silencer-element V$ZBPF/ZF9.01 Core promoter- 0.87 803- (+) 0.769 0.878 ccgggggCAG 252 binding protein 825nc Ccccctctaacct (CPBP) with 3 Krueppel-type zinc fingers V$HICF/HIC1.01 Hypermethylated 0.93 804-816 (−) 1.000 0.970 ggggcTGCCcc 253 in cancer 1, cg transcriptional repressor containing five Krüppel-like C2H2 zinc fingers, for optimal binding multiple binding sites are required. V$NFKB/NFKAPP NF-kappaB (p50) 0.83 806-818 (−) 0.750 0.865 aggGGGCtgcc 254 AB50.01 cc V$STAF/ZNF76_14 ZNF143 is the 0.76 810-832 (+) 0.809 0.761 cagcCCCCtcta 255 3.01 human ortholog accttgggcct of Xenopus Staf, ZNF76 is a DNA binding protein related to ZNF143 and Staf V$SF1F/SF1.01 SF1 0.95 819-831 (−) 1.000 0.966 ggccCAAGgtt 256 steroidogenic ag factor 1 V$RXRF/VDR_RX Bipartite binding 0.75 825- (+) 0.812 0.787 ttgggcctcagcag 257 R.06 site of 849nc cAGGGgaggc VDR/RXR c heterodimers: 4 spacer nucleotides between the two directly repeated motifs V$MYOD/MYF5.01 Myf5 myogenic 0.90 831- (+) 1.000 0.903 ctcagCAGCag 258 bHLH protein 847nc gggagg V$NRSF/NRSF.01 Neuron- 0.69 831- (+) 1.000 0.705 ctcAGCAgcag 259 restrictive 851nc? gggaggccac silencer factor V$ZBPF/ZF9.01 Core promoter- 0.87 832-854 (−) 0.820 0.890 ggggtggCCTC 260 binding protein ccctgctgctga (CPBP) with 3 Krueppel-type zinc fingers V$ZBPF/ZF9.01 Core promoter- 0.87 841- (+) 0.923 0.937 ggggaggCCA 261 binding protein 863nc Cccctacaccttc (CPBP) with 3 Krueppel-type zinc fingers V$PLAG/PLAG1.01 Pleomorphic 0.88 847-867 (−) 0.958 0.929 GGGGgaaggtg 262 adenoma gene taggggtggc (PLAG) 1, a developmentally regulated C2H2 zinc finger protein V$ZBPF/ZNF202.01 Transcriptional 0.73 859-881 (+) 1.000 0.776 ccttccCCCAgc 263 repressor, binds cacagccatcc to elements found predominantly in genes that participate in lipid metabolism V$INSM/INSM1.01 Zinc finger 0.90 860-872 (−) 1.000 0.965 tggctGGGGga 264 protein ag insulinoma- associated 1 (IA- 1) functions as a transcriptional repressor V$MZF1/MZF1.02 Myeloid zinc 0.99 860-868 (−) 1.000 0.994 tgGGGGaag 265 finger protein MZF1 V$HAML/AML3.01 Runt-related 0.84 863-877 (−) 1.000 0.845 ggctGTGGctg 266 transcription gggg factor 2/CBFA1 (core-binding factor, runt domain, alpha subunit 1) V$NRF1/NRF1.01 Nuclear 0.78 889- (−) 0.750 0.828 tctGCACaggc 267 respiratory factor 905nc gctgct 1 (NRF1), bZIP transcription factor that acts on nuclear genes encoding mitochondrial proteins V$NRF1/NRF1.01 Nuclear 0.78 890- (+) 1.000 0.801 gcaGCGCctgt 268 respiratory factor 906nc gcagaa 1 (NRF1), bZIP transcription factor that acts on nuclear genes encoding mitochondrial proteins V$SORY/HBP1.01 HMG box- 0.86 898- (+) 1.000 0.862 tgtgcagAATG 269 containing 910nc aa protein 1 V$BRNF/BRN2.03 Brn-2, POU-III 0.92 923-941 (+) 1.000 0.932 ggctccttaATT 270 protein class Ttttttt V$NKXH/NKX25.0 Homeo domain 0.88 925-939 (+) 1.000 0.956 ctcctTAATttttt 271 2 factor Nkx- t 2.5/Csx, tinman homolog low affinity sites V$CDXF/CDX1.01 Intestine specific 0.94 939-957 (+) 1.000 0.948 tttttttTTTAaga 272 homeodomain aataa factor CDX-1 V$HOXF/HOXB9.0 Abd-B-like 0.88 940-956 (−) 1.000 0.888 tatttctTAAAaa 273 1 homeodomain aaaa protein Hoxb-9 V$CEBP/CEBPB.01 CCAAT/enhancer 0.94 943- (+) 1.000 0.942 ttttttaaGAAAt 274 binding protein 957nc aa beta V$HNF1/HNF1.01 Hepatic nuclear 0.80 947-963 (−) 0.790 0.824 cATTAattatttct 275 factor 1 taa V$HOXF/BARX2.0 Barx2, 0.95 948-964 (−) 1.000 0.967 tcatTAATtatttc 276 1 homeobox tta transcription factor that preferentially binds to paired TAAT motifs V$BRNF/BRN3.01 Brn-3, POU-IV 0.78 949-967 (−) 1.000 0.990 gcctcattaATT 277 protein class Atttctt V$BRNF/BRN4.01 POU domain 0.89 949- (+) 1.000 0.894 aagaaataatTA 278 transcription 967nc ATgaggc factor brain 4 V$LHXF/LMX1B.0 LIM- 0.91 949- (+) 1.000 0.962 aagaaaTAATta 279 1 homeodomain 963nc atg transcription factor V$HOMF/S8.01 Binding site for 0.97 950- (+) 1.000 0.997 agaaaTAATtaa 280 S8 type 962nc t homeodomains V$HOXF/GSH1.01 Homeobox 0.85 952- (+) 1.000 0.863 aaataatTAATg 281 transcription 968nc aggct factor Gsh-1 V$LHXF/LMX1B.0 LIM- 0.91 952-966 (−) 1.000 0.946 cctcatTAATtat 282 1 homeodomain tt transcription factor V$RBIT/BRIGHT.0 Bright, B cell 0.92 952- (+) 1.000 0.961 aaataATTAatg 283 1 regulator of IgH 964nc a transcription V$HOMF/S8.01 Binding site for 0.97 953-965 (−) 1.000 0.992 ctcatTAATtatt 284 S8 type homeodomains V$LHXF/LHX3.01 Homeodomain 0.81 953- (+) 1.000 0.851 aataaTTAAtga 285 binding site in 967nc ggc LIM/Homeodo- main factor LHX3 V$SORY/HBP1.01 HMG box- 0.86 953- (+) 1.000 0.876 aataattAATGa 286 containing 965nc g protein 1 V$HOXF/BARX2.0 Barx2, 0.95 955- (+) 1.000 0.987 taatTAATgagg 287 1 homeobox 971nc ctcct transcription factor that preferentially binds to paired TAAT motifs V$RXRF/VDR_RX VDR/RXR 0.86 960-984 (−) 1.000 0.871 tcccaggtgagtG 288 R.02 Vitamin D AGGagcctcatt receptor RXR heterodimer site V$AP1F/AP1.03 Activator protein 0.94 969-979 (−) 1.000 0.940 ggTGAGtgagg 289 1 V$AREB/AREB6.01 AREB6 (Atp1a1 0.93 972- (+) 1.000 0.933 cactcACCTgg 290 regulatory 984nc ga element binding factor 6) V$PAX6/PAX6.02 PAX6 paired 0.89 973-991 (−) 1.000 0.893 caggctgtcCCA 291 domain and Ggtgagt homeodomain are required for binding to this site V$AP2F/AP2.01 Activator protein 0.90 1033- (−) 1.000 0.911 ctgGCCTtggg 292 2 1047 gaac V$EREF/ERR.01 Estrogen related 0.87 1033- (+) 1.000 0.897 gttccccAAGG 293 receptor 1051nc ccagcggg V$MZF1/MZF1.02 Myeloid zinc 0.99 1033- (−) 1.000 0.994 ttGGGGaac 294 finger protein 1041 MZF1 V$SF1F/SF1.01 SF1 0.95 1035- (+) 1.000 0.992 tcccCAAGgcc 295 steroidogenic 1047nc ag factor 1 V$TEAF/TEF.01 Thyrotrophic 0.88 1044- (−) 0.968 0.894 ggcacaCATCc 296 embryonic factor 1060 cgctgg V$SP1F/TIEG.01 TGFbeta- 0.83 1046- (+) 0.750 0.878 agcGGGAtgtgt 297 inducible early 1060nc gcc gene (TIEG)/ Early growth response gene alpha (EGRalpha) V$MAZF/MAZ.01 Myc associated 0.90 1056- (−) 1.000 0.909 ggagGAGGgg 298 zinc finger 1068 cac protein (MAZ) V$RXRF/VDR_RX Bipartite binding 0.74 1056- (−) 0.823 0.750 gatgAGTTggg 299 R.03 site of 1080 aggaggaggggc VDR/RXR ac heterodimers without a spacer between directly repeated motifs V$EVI1/MEL1.02 MEL1 0.99 1071- (−) 1.000 0.997 cctgaaaGATG 300 (MDS1/EVI1- 1087 agttgg like gene 1) DNA-binding domain 2 V$HEAT/HSF1.01 Heat shock factor 0.84 1073- (−) 0.857 0.849 tcctcgtgttccTG 301 1 1097 AAagatgagtt V$MYT1/MYT1L.0 Myelin 0.92 1073- (−) 0.818 0.927 tgaaAGATgag 302 1 transcription 1085 tt factor 1-like, neuronal C2HC zinc finger factor 1 V$STAT/STAT1.01 Signal transducer 0.77 1075- (−) 0.767 0.774 cgtgttcctGAA 303 and activator of 1093 Agatgag transcription 1 V$STAT/STAT.01 Signal 0.87 1077- (+) 1.000 0.911 catctttcaGGA 304 transducers and 1095 Acacgag activators of transcription V$EBOX/NMYC.01 N-Myc 0.92 1085- (−) 1.000 0.923 aatcctCGTGttc 305 1099 ct V$HEAT/HSF2.02 Heat shock factor 0.95 1089- (−) 1.000 0.967 ttccagaaagcaA 306 2 1113 GAAtcctcgtgt V$HEAT/HSF1.01 Heat shock factor 0.84 1097- (−) 1.000 0.874 ggacacttttccA 307 1 1121 GAAagcaagaat V$STAT/STAT1.01 Signal transducer 0.77 1099- (−) 0.767 0.798 acttttccaGAA 308 and activator of 1117 Agcaaga transcription 1 V$STAT/STAT.01 Signal 0.87 1101- (+) 1.000 0.895 ttgctttctGGAA 309 transducers and 1119 aagtgt activators of transcription V$BCL6/BCL6.02 POZ/zinc finger 0.77 1102- (+) 0.800 0.808 tgctttcTGGAa 310 protein, 1118 aagtg transcriptional repressor, translocations observed in diffuse large cell lymphoma V$BNCF/BNC.01 Basonuclin, 0.85 1107- (+) 1.000 0.852 tctggaaaagTG 311 cooperates with 1125 TCccagc USF1 in rDNA Po1I transcription) V$GATA/GATA2.0 GATA-binding 0.92 1127- (+) 1.000 0.938 taggGATAagt 312 1 factor 2 1139 gt V$NKXH/NKX32.0 Homeodomain 0.96 1128- (+) 1.000 0.962 agggataAGTG 313 1 protein NKX3.2 1142 tcta (BAPX1, NKX3B, Bagpipe homolog) V$PAX1/PAX1.01 Pax1 paired 0.62 1135- (−) 0.750 0.696 cCATTctgtgct 314 domain protein, 1153 agacact expressed in the developing vertebral column of mouse embryos V$SORY/HBP1.01 HMG box- 0.86 1142- (+) 1.000 0.860 agcacagAATG 315 containing 1154nc gg protein 1 V$NKXH/NKX25.0 Homeo domain 0.88 1166- (+) 1.000 0.898 gtgctTAATaaa 316 2 factor Nkx- 1180 tgc 2.5/Csx, tinman homolog low affinity sites V$HOXF/HOXC13. Homeodomain 0.91 1167- (+) 1.000 0.944 tgcttaaTAAAt 317 01 transcription 1183 gctgg factor HOXC13 V$HOXC/HOX_PB HOX/PBX 0.81 1178- (+) 0.944 0.862 tgctGGATggat 318 X.01 binding sites 1194 gcagg V$AIRE/AIRE.01 Autoimmune 0.86 1184- (+) 1.000 0.877 atggatgcaggaa 319 regulator 1210 ggaaTGGAgga atg V$ETSF/ELF2.01 Ets-family 0.90 1186- (+) 1.000 0.933 ggatgcaGGAA 320 member ELF-2 1202 ggaatg (NERF1a) V$GKLF/GKLF.01 Gut-enriched 0.86 1191- (+) 0.779 0.864 caggaaggaAT 321 Krueppel-like 1203 GG factor V$SORY/HBP1.01 HMG box- 0.86 1192- (+) 1.000 0.904 aggaaggAATG 322 containing 1204 ga protein 1 V$TEAF/TEF1.01 TEF-1 related 0.84 1192- (−) 1.000 0.859 ttcctcCATTcct 323 muscle factor 1208 tcct V$ETSF/PU1.01 Pu.1 (Pu120) Ets- 0.89 1198- (+) 1.000 0.899 gaatggaGGAA 324 like transcription 1214 tgaatg factor identified in lymphoid B- cells V$SORY/HBP1.01 HMG box- 0.86 1200- (+) 1.000 0.916 atggaggAATG 325 containing 1212 aa protein 1 V$TEAF/TEF1.01 TEF-1 related 0.84 1200- (−) 1.000 0.884 cccattCATTcct 326 muscle factor 1216 ccat V$SORY/HBP1.01 HMG box- 0.86 1204- (+) 1.000 0.949 aggaatgAATG 327 containing 1216 gg protein 1 V$IRFF/IRF7.01 Interferon 0.86 1208- (+) 0.936 0.885 atGAATgggaa 328 regulatory factor 1226nc ggtctaga 7 (IRF-7) V$RBPF/RBPJK.02 Mammalian 0.94 1209- (+) 1.000 0.942 tgaaTGGGaag 329 transcriptional 1223nc gtct repressor RBP- Jkappa/CBF1 V$IKRS/IK1.01 Ikaros 1, 0.92 1210- (+) 1.000 0.925 gaatGGGAagg 330 potential 1222nc tc regulator of lymphocyte differentiation V$RORA/NBRE.01 Monomers of the 0.89 1212- (+) 1.000 0.947 atgggAAGGtct 331 nur subfamily of 1230nc agagcat nuclear receptors (nur77, nurr-1, nor-1) V$ZFIA/ZID.01 Zinc finger with 0.85 1225- (−) 1.000 0.916 agGCTCcatgct 332 interaction 1237 c domain V$AIRE/AIRE.01 Autoimmune 0.86 1238- (−) 0.916 0.863 atgtgggcgggtg 333 regulator 1264 agcaTGGCttct ag V$EGRF/WT1.01 Wilms Tumor 0.92 1246- (−) 0.953 0.930 gtgggCGGGtg 334 Suppressor 1262 agcatg V$SP1F/SP1.01 Stimulating 0.88 1250- (−) 1.000 0.907 atgtGGGCgggt 335 protein 1, 1264 gag ubiquitous zinc finger transcription factor V$NKXH/HMX3.02 Hmx3/Nkx5-1 0.92 1258- (−) 1.000 0.933 ttaaTTAAatgtg 336 homeodomain 1272 gg transcription factor V$CREB/E4BP4.01 E4BP4, bZIP 0.80 1259- (+) 0.758 0.801 ccacatttaaTTA 337 domain, 1279 Acagctga transcriptional repressor V$BRNF/BRN3.02 Brn-3, POU-IV 0.89 1260- (−) 1.000 0.940 cagctgtTAATt 338 protein class 1278 aaatgtg V$LHXF/LHX3.01 Homeodomain 0.81 1260- (+) 1.000 0.944 cacatTTAAtta 339 binding site in 1274 aca LIM/Homeo- domain factor LHX3 V$OCT1/OCT1.05 Octamer-binding 0.89 1260- (+) 0.900 0.942 caCATTtaattaa 340 factor 1 1274 ca V$HOMF/S8.01 Binding site for 0.97 1261- (+) 1.000 0.997 acattTAATtaa 341 S8 type 1273 c homeodomains V$HOXF/PHOX2.01 Phox2a (ARIX) 0.87 1262- (+) 1.000 0.877 cattTAATtaac 342 and Phox2b 1278 agctg V$NKXH/NKX25.0 Homeo domain 0.88 1262- (−) 1.000 0.898 gctgtTAATtaa 343 2 factor Nkx- 1276 atg 2.5/Csx, tinman homolog low affinity sites V$PBXC/PBX1_ME Binding site for a 0.77 1262- (+) 0.750 0.781 cattTAATtaac 344 IS1.02 Pbx1/Meis1 1278 agctg heterodimer V$RBIT/BRIGHT.0 Bright, B cell 0.92 1262- (−) 1.000 0.967 tgttaATTAaatg 345 1 regulator of IgH 1274 transcription V$FAST/FAST1.01 FAST-1 SMAD 0.81 1263- (−) 0.850 0.845 agctgttAATTa 346 interacting 1277 aat protein V$LHXF/LHX3.01 Homeodomain 0.81 1263- (−) 1.000 0.870 agctgTTAAtta 347 binding site in 1277 aat LIM/Homeo- domain factor LHX3 V$RBIT/BRIGHT.0 Bright, B cell 0.92 1263- (+) 1.000 0.941 atttaATTAaca 348 1 regulator of IgH 1275 g transcription V$ZNFP/SZF1.01 SZF1, 0.82 1263- (−) 0.875 0.866 tcaGGGActca 349 hematopoietic 1287 gctgttaattaaat progenitor- restricted KRAB- zinc finger protein V$ATBF/ATBF1.01 AT-binding 0.79 1264- (−) 1.000 0.812 ctcagctgttAAT 350 transcription 1280 Taaa factor 1 V$HOMF/S8.01 Binding site for 0.97 1264- (−) 1.000 0.997 gctgtTAATtaa 351 S8 type 1276 a homeodomains V$HEN1/HEN1.02 HEN1 0.81 1265- (−) 1.000 0.845 agggactcaGCT 352 1285 Gttaattaa V$NKXH/HMX3.02 Hmx3/Nkx5-1 0.92 1265- (+) 1.000 0.927 ttaaTTAAcagc 353 homeodomain 1279 tga transcription factor V$AP4R/AP4.02 Activator protein 0.92 1267- (−) 1.000 0.950 ggactcAGCTgt 354 4 1283 taatt V$AP1R/NFE2.01 NF-E2 p45 0.85 1268- (+) 1.000 0.865 attaacagCTGA 355 1292 gtccctgatgtca V$BEL1/BEL1.01 Bel-1 similar 0.81 1270- (−) 1.000 0.842 tgacatcagggac 356 region (defined 1292 TCAGctgtta in Lentivirus LTRs) V$CREB/CREBP1.0 cAMP- 0.85 1278- (−) 1.000 0.851 taaggaTGACat 357 1 responsive 1298 cagggactc element binding protein 1 V$CREB/ATF2.01 Activating 0.87 1279- (+) 0.814 0.871 agtcccTGATgt 358 transcription 1299 catccttac factor 2 V$E4FF/E4F.01 GLI-Krueppel- 0.82 1284- (+) 0.842 0.824 ctgATGTcatcc 359 related 1296 t transcription factor, regulator of adenovirus E4 promoter V$HOXF/PTX1.01 Pituitary 0.94 1299- (−) 1.000 0.949 tttCTAAgctctt 360 Homeobox 1 1315 cgag (Ptx1, Pitx-1) V$TBPF/ATATA.01 Avian C-type 0.78 1302- (−) 1.000 0.781 ttgtttcTAAGct 361 LTR TATA box 1318 cttc V$XBBF/RFX1.01 X-box binding 0.89 1302- (+) 0.881 0.890 gaagagcttaGA 362 protein RFX1 1320 AAcaaag V$LEFF/LEF1.01 TCF/LEF-1, 0.86 1309- (+) 1.000 0.884 ttagaaaCAAA 363 involved in the 1325nc gagtgg Wnt signal transduction pathway V$RBPF/RBPJK.02 Mammalian 0.94 1319- (+) 1.000 0.977 agagTGGGaaa 364 transcriptional 1333 nc tgct repressor RBP- Jkappa/CBF1 V$CP2F/CP2.01 CP2 0.90 1331- (−) 1.000 0.932 agCTGGgtaaa 365 1349 gctagagc V$SRFF/SRF.02 Serum response 0.84 1362- (+) 0.888 0.842 taaggCAAAttg 366 factor 1380 ggccatt V$CART/XVENT2. Xenopus 0.82 1366- (+) 0.750 0.882 gcAAATtgggc 367 01 homeodomain 1382 cattaa factor Xvent-2; early BMP signaling response V$CART/XVENT2. Xenopus 0.82 1367- (−) 1.000 0.835 ttTAATggccca 368 01 homeodomain 1383 atttg factor Xvent-2; early BMP signaling response V$PDX1/1SL1.01 Pancreatic and 0.82 1370- (−) 1.000 0.875 ctgagctttTAAT 369 intestinal lim- 1390 ggcccaat homeodomain factor V$NKXH/HMX3.02 Hmx3/Nkx5-1 0.92 1372- (−) 1.000 0.946 gcttTTAAtggc 370 homeodomain 1386 cca transcription factor V$HOXF/HOXC13. Homeodomain 0.91 1373- (+) 1.000 0.932 gggccatTAAA 371 01 transcription 1389 agctca factor HOXC13 V$NKXH/HMX3.02 Hmx3/Nkx5-1 0.92 1375- (+) 1.000 0.953 gccaTTAAaag 372 homeodomain 1389 ctca transcription factor V$MYBL/VMYB.05 v-Myb, variant of 0.90 1404- (+) 1.000 0.990 attAACGgtggt 373 AMV v-myb 1416 g V$AHRR/AHRARN Aryl hydrocarbon/ 0.77 1423- (−) 0.750 0.781 cctgtggataGA 374 T.02 Arnt 1447 GTgtgaaagcaa heterodimers, c fixed core V$EVI1/EVI1.06 Ecotropic viral 0.83 1440- (+) 0.750 0.835 tccacaGGATa 375 integration site 1 1456 gattga encoded factor, amino-terminal zinc finger domain V$HOXC/HOX_PB HOX/PBX 0.81 1442- (+) 0.944 0.814 cacaGGATaga 376 X.01 binding sites 1458 ttgaaa V$HOXC/PBX1.01 Homeo domain 0.78 1446- (+) 1.000 0.809 ggataGATTga 377 factor Pbx-1 1462 aactgc V$IRFF/ISRE.01 Interferon- 0.81 1447- (+) 1.000 0.829 gatagattGAAA 378 stimulated 1465 ctgccag response element V$HOXH/MEIS1B_ Meis1b and 0.78 1450- (−) 0.750 0.781 TGGCagtttcaat 379 HOXA9.01 Hoxa9 form 1464 ct heterodimeric binding complexes on target DNA V$NR2F/ARP1.01 Apolipoprotein 0.82 1469- (−) 0.857 0.897 ccagggtcaggG 380 AI regulatory 1489 ATCaggtgg protein 1, NR2F2 V$MEF3/MEF3.01 MEF3 binding 0.89 1474- (−) 1.000 0.943 gggTCAGggat 381 site, present in 1486 ca skeletal muscle- specific transcriptional enhancers V$RORA/TR4.01 Nuclear hormone 0.84 1474- (−) 1.000 0.841 atcccagGGTC 382 receptor TR4 1492 agggatca homodimer binding site V$CSEN/DREAM.0 Downstream 0.95 1476- (−) 1.000 0.974 ggGTCAgggat 383 1 regulatory 1486 element- antagonist modulator, Ca2+-binding protein of the neuronal calcium sensors family that binds DRE (downstream regulatory element) sites as a tetramer V$CP2F/CP2.01 CP2 0.90 1493- (+) 1.000 0.969 ggCTGGattga 384 1511 gcaatgag V$HOXC/PBX1.01 Homeo domain 0.78 1493- (+) 1.000 0.811 ggctgGATTga 385 factor Pbx-1 1509 gcaatg V$CEBP/CEBPB.01 CCAAT/enhancer 0.94 1496- (+) 1.000 0.984 tggattgaGCAA 386 binding protein 1510 tga beta V$CAAT/NFY.03 Nuclear factor Y 0.81 1513- (+) 1.000 0.873 agagCCAAgca 387 (Y-box binding 1527 gcac factor) V$STAF/ZNF76_14 ZNF143 is the 0.76 1522- (−) 1.000 0.765 tagcCCCAggg 388 3.01 human ortholog 1544 gactctgtgctg of Xenopus Staf, ZNF76 is a DNA binding protein related to ZNF143 and Staf V$NOLF/OLF1.01 Olfactory 0.82 1526- (+) 1.000 0.879 acagagTCCCct 389 neuron-specific 1548 ggggctagagg factor V$AP2F/AP2.02 Activator protein 0.92 1531- (−) 0.905 0.941 ctaGCCCcagg 390 2 alpha 1545 ggac V$ZBPF/ZNF202.01 Transcriptional 0.73 1536- (−) 0.761 0.739 gcctccTCCAcc 391 repressor, binds 1558 tctagccccag to elements found predominantly in genes that participate in lipid metabolism V$IKRS/IK1.01 Ikaros 1, 0.92 1561- (+) 1.000 0.933 tcctGGGAatgg 392 potential 1573 g regulator of lymphocyte differentiation V$TEAF/TEF1.01 TEF-1 related 0.84 1561- (−) 1.000 0.855 ttttccCATTccc 393 muscle factor 1577 agga V$IRFF/IRF7.01 Interferon 0.86 1565- (+) 0.936 0.895 ggGAATggga 394 regulatory factor 1583nc aaaacccca 7 (IRF-7) V$LTUP/TAACC.01 Lentiviral TATA 0.71 1565- (+) 1.000 0.721 gggaatgggaaa 395 upstream element 1587nc AACCccaactt V$RBPF/RBPJK.02 Mammalian 0.94 1566- (+) 1.000 0.947 ggaaTGGGaaa 396 transcriptional 1580nc aacc repressor RBP- Jkappa/CBF1 V$IKRS/IK1.01 Ikaros 1, 0.92 1567- (+) 1.000 0.927 gaatGGGAaaa 397 potential 1579nc ac regulator of lymphocyte differentiation V$NFKB/CREL.01 c-Rel 0.91 1571- (−) 1.000 0.971 tggggtttTTCCc 398 1583 V$CIZF/NMP4.01 NMP4 (nuclear 0.97 1572- (+) 1.000 0.986 ggAAAAacccc 399 matrix protein 4)/ 1582nc CIZ (Cas- interacting zinc finger protein) V$SRFF/SRF.02 Serum response 0.84 1576- (−) 0.888 0.881 gacccCAAAgt 400 factor 1594 tggggttt V$MYT1/MYT1.02 MyT1 zinc 0.88 1578- (−) 1.000 0.882 ccaAAGTtggg 401 finger 1590 gt transcription factor involved in primary neurogenesis Cartharius K, et al. (2005) Bioinformatics 21, 2933-42.

Example 4

Utilising the data from Examples 2 and 3, a suite of constructs are generated containing various shRNA suppressors and/or replacement rhodopsin nucleic acids enhanced with additional promoter sequences, known to be conserved between vertebrate species and various sequences known to enhance expression at RNA and/or protein levels. FIGS. 9 and 16 represents diagrammatically sequences cloned in suppression and/or replacement constructs. Notably, any combination of the elements and conserved regions outlined and indeed other elements that can modulate gene expression could be used in the invention to control expression of suppression and/or replacement components.

Suppression and/or replacement constructs (FIG. 9) were then used to generate recombinant AAV2/5 viruses using the procedures provided in Example 1. AAV2/5 suppression and/or replacement vectors were evaluated in 129 wild type (WT) mice for levels of expression of suppressors and/or replacement nucleic acids at the RNA and protein levels as detailed in Example 1. FIG. 10A illustrates a comparison using an RNAse protection assay of levels of human rhodopsin expression from the RHO-M transgene in RHO-M mice (lane M) versus the rhodopsin expression obtained from the suppression and replacement constructs in rAAV2/5 subretinally injected into wild type 129 mice (lanes B8, B9, B11, B12, B13, B16, B8). FIG. 10A illustrates that AAV-BBB, AAV-BB10, AAV-BB11, AAV-BB12, AAV-BB13 and AAV-BB16 express the human rhodopsin replacement gene in RNA extracted from 129 wild type mice subretinally injected with these suppression and or replacement constructs. AAV-BB8, AAV-BB10 and AAV-BB11 express human rhodopsin at lower levels than AAV-BB12, AAV-BB13 and AAV-BB16.

Further evaluation of suppression and replacement vectors was undertaken. FIG. 11 provides a comparative analysis of human rhodopsin expression from rAAV2/5 suppression and replacement vectors using real time RT-PCR. FIG. 11 illustrates replacement rhodopsin expression levels in RNA extracted from 129 wild type mice subretinally injected with suppression and/or replacement constructs. Expression levels were also determined in Rho-M transgenic mice which express a rhodopsin replacement construct termed rCC and display normal retinal function. Suppression and replacement vectors AAV-BB12, AAV-BB13, AAV-BB16 and AAV-BB18 express approximately in the same order of magnitude as levels of replacement rhodopsin transcript in Rho-M mice, indicating that enhanced replacement constructs with enhancer elements and conserved regions may express sufficient levels of rhodopsin to sustain a functional retina in vivo.

FIG. 12 illustrates retinal histology of adult wild type mouse retinas subretinally injected with 2 ul of 2×1012 particle/ml of different suppression and replacement rhodopsin AAV vectors (see FIG. 9). Two weeks post-injection of AAV vectors transduced eyes were removed, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and cryosectioned (12 um). Subsequently, sections were stained with human specific anti-RHO antibody to visualise expression of replacement-RHO using Cy3 label (red) on the secondary antibody; cell nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (blue). A: AAV-BBB, B: AAV-BB13, C: AAV-BB24, D: AAV-Q8, E: AAV-Q26, F: retina from uninjected Rho-M transgenic mouse expressing RHO (positive control). Clear evidence of human rhodopsin expression from AAV suppression and replacement vectors was obtained. Sections indicate different levels of human RHO expression from the AAV suppression and replacement vectors under evaluation. OS: photoreceptor outer segments; IS: photoreceptor inner segments; ONL: outer nuclear layer; INL: inner nuclear layer; GCL: ganglion cell layer.

To explore efficacy of the suppression component of the suppression and replacement approach delivered using AAV, a variety of suppression only vectors were generated with an EGFP reporter gene (see FIG. 9). Adult NHR transgenic mice on a rho−/− background, therefore expressing normal human RHO but not mouse rho, were transduced by subretinal injection of 2 ul of 2×10¹² particle/ml of AAV-shQ1-EGFP (A) or AAV-shNT-EGFP (B). Two weeks after injection, eyes were removed, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and cryosectioned (FIG. 13). AAV-shQ1-EGFP expresses shRNA-Q1, which targets RHO, while AAV-shNT-EGFP expresses a non-targeting shRNA (see FIG. 9 for constructs). Both constructs express EGFP allowing tracking of the transduced cell populations (green). Sections were counterstained with DAPI (blue) to label the position of the nuclear layers. A significant reduction in the photoreceptor cell number in the transduced part of the outer nuclear layer was apparent in the AAV-shQ1-EGFP injected (A) retinas compared to those of injected with AAV-shNT-EGFP (B) (FIG. 13). IS: photoreceptor inner segments; ONL: outer nuclear layer; INL: inner nuclear layer; GCL: ganglion cell layer.

Adult RHO-347 transgenic mice carrying a dominant RHO mutation causing retinal degeneration akin to human RP, were subretinally injected with 2 ul of 2×10¹² particle/ml of AAV-shNT (A) or AAV-shQ1 (B) vectors (FIG. 14A). Two weeks post-injection transduced eyes were removed, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and cryosectioned (12 um). AAV-shQ1 expresses shRNA-Q1, which targets RHO, while AAV-shNT expresses a non-targeting shRNA. Both constructs express EGFP allowing tracking of the transduced part of the retina (green). Sections were counterstained with DAPI (blue) to indicate positions of the nuclear layers. A significant reduction of the photoreceptor cell numbers in the transduced part of the outer nuclear layer in the AAV-shNT injected or the uninjected (C) retinas was apparent due to the degenerative effects of RHO-347 transgene (FIG. 14A). A significantly preserved outer nuclear layer is detected in the AAV-shQ1 transduced retinas, where shRNA-Q1 effectively suppresses the RHO-347 transcript therefore reducing retinal degeneration (FIG. 14A). Note that the mouse rhodopsin gene (expressed in these retinas) was refractory to suppression by shRNA-Q1 due to the presence of nucleotide changes at the target site for Q1 siRNA-based suppression. Suppression of human rhodopsin and replacement using the degeneracy of the genetic code provided therapeutic benefit at a histological level in RHO-347 mice.

In addition, FIG. 14D provides evidence of an improvement in the electroretinogram (ERG) in RHO-347 eyes treated with AAV-shQ1-EGFP versus eyes treated with AAV-shNT-EGFP. In FIG. 14D a representative maximum ERG response of a RHO-347 mouse, containing a human rhodopsin transgene with a mutation at codon 347, subretinally injected with AAV2/5 constructs is presented. This RHO-347 mouse normally displays a phenotype similar to autosomal dominant RP. The top figure is the response of the right eye, which received an injection of AAV-shQ1-EGFP, a AAV2/5 vector containing suppressor siRNA Q1 driven by an H1 promoter (shQ1) and a CMV-driven EGFP gene. The left eye received an AAV-shNT-EGFP, a AAV2/5 containing a non-targeting (control) siRNA driven by an H1 promoter (shNT) and a CMV-driven EGFP gene. As can be seen above, the maximum response is significantly greater in the treated right eye than in the control left eye, indicating that suppression of the mutant rhodopsin transgene leads to some rescue at the ERG level.

Example 5 Sequences of Various Elements Designed to Enhance Expression of Replacement Constructs

As described, enhancer elements, conserved regions A through I and/or transcription factor binding sites and/or other regulatory elements and/or epigenetic elements may be combined to improve expression of replacement constructs (see FIGS. 9 and 15 and Tables 1, 2, 9-13). These elements can be used in many different combinations to achieve optimum expression, as demonstrated in the Examples provided above. Additional examples include inter alia a construct comprising a human rhodopsin gene expressed from a composite promoter element containing the 484 bp mouse rhodopsin promoter together with the CMV enhancer, the rhodopsin promoter enhancer element, the rhodopsin promoter conserved region B and flanked at the 3′end of the gene by a woodchuck posttranscriptional regulatory element and a minimal poly A sequence. Another example is similar to the one above but instead of the CMV enhancer, it contains multiples of the CRX and/or NRL binding sites.

Example 6 Utilisation of Neuroprotective/Neurotrophic Factors in Conjunction with Suppression and Replacement

As described above, there is evidence from the prior art that neurotrophic/neuroprotective factors can improve cell viability and or cell functioning, the sequences encoding a number of these factors are provided in FIG. 17. FIG. 18 provides suppression and replacement constructs containing genetic elements that are beneficial for neuronal cell survival. In the example, the suppression and replacement construct pAAV-BB18 (FIG. 9) has been combined with the gene encoding the neurotrophic factor GDNF, driven by a small UCOE (chromatin opening element. A Thrasher, Abstract 36, British Society for Gene Therapy 5th Annual Conference 2008) promoter. Notably other neurotrophic factors and or genes encoding neurotrophic factors such as, for example, Neurturin may also be used in combination with any of the suppression and replacement constructs described. In example A (FIG. 18), the additional element, in this case sequence encoding GDNF is co-located with the suppression and replacement construct within the two AAV inverted terminal repeat sequences, ITS1 and ITS2. In the second example, B (FIG. 18), the GDNF gene and its promoter are not co-located with the suppression and replacement elements within ITS1 and ITS2, but are located within the backbone of the plasmid used to generate AAV. Since a small proportion of the backbone is packaged during AAV production, this results in a mixed population of AAVs with the majority containing the suppression and replacement elements and a minority the GDNF elements.

AAV vectors generated to contain suppression, replacement and neurotrophic/neuroprotection components can be subretinally injected into wild type mice and or into mice with inherited retinal degenerations such as the RHO-347 and Pro23H is mice described in the Examples above.

TABLE 14 Enhancers CMV Enhancer (SEQ ID NO: 402) CCGCGTTACA TAACTTACGG TAAATGGCCC GCCTGGCTG A CCGCCCAACG ACCCCCGCCC ATTGACGTCA ATAATGACGT ATGTTCCCAT AGTAACGCCA ATAGGGACTT TCCATTGACG TCAATGGGTG GAGTATTTAC GGTAAACTGC CCACTTGGCA GTACATCAAG TGTATCATAT GCCAAGTACG CCCCCTATTG ACGTCAATGA CGGTAAATGG CCCGCCTGGC ATTATGCCCA GTACATGACC TTATGGGACT TTCCTACTTG GCAGTACATC TACGTATTAG TCATCGCTAT TACCATGGTG ATGCGGTTTT GGCAGTACAT CAATGGGCGT GGATAGCGGT TTGACTCACG GGGATTTCCA AGTCTCCACC CCATTGACGT CAATGGGAGT TTGTTTTGGC ACCAAAATCA ACGGGAC Rhodopsin promoter conserved REGION A (SEQ ID NO: 403) GAGTGTCTAATTGCTTATGATCATGCATGCTCTCTCTCCCACTAAACATT TATTAATGTGTTAGGATTTCCATTAGCGCGTGCCTTGAACTGAAATCATT TGCATATGGCTGGGAAAAAGTGGGGTGAGGGAGGAAACAGTGCCAGCTCC CCAACAGGCGTCAATCACAGTGACAGATCAGATGG Rhodopsin Promoter Enhancer Element (contains Crx D(−) & CrxE (+) & NRL binding sites) (SEQ ID NO: 404 TTTCTGCAGCGGGGATTAATATGATTATG AACACCCCCAATCTCCCAGATGCTGATTCAGCCAGGAGGTACC Crx D(−) (SEQ ID NO: 405) GCGGGGATTAATAT CrxE (+)(SEQ ID NO: 406) TGAACACCCCCAATCTC NRL (SEQ ID NO: 407) TGCTGATTCAGC Rhodopsin promoter conserved region B (SEQ ID NO: 408) TCTGCTGACCCAGCAACACTCTTTCCTTCTGAGGCTTAAGAGCTATTAGC GTAGGTGACTCAGTCCCTAATCCTCC Human rhodopsin polyA region F  (SEQ ID NO: 409) GACCTGCCTAGGACTCTGTGGCCGACTATAGGCGTCTCCCATCCCCTACA CCTTCCCCCAGCCACAGCCATCCCACCAGGAGCAGCGCCTGTGCAGAATG AACGAAGTCACATAGGCTCCTTAATTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTAAGAAATAAT TAATGAGGCTCCTCACTC Human rhodopsin polyA region G  (SEQ ID NO: 410) ACCTGGGACAGCCTGAGAAGGGACATCCACCAAGACCTAC TGATCTGGAGTCCCACGTTCCCCAAGGCCAGCGGGATGTGTGCCCCTCCT CCTCCCAACTCATCTTTCAGGAACACGAGGATTCTTGCTTTCTGGAAAAG TGTCCCAGCTTAGGGATAAGTGTCTAGCACAGAATGGGGCACACAGTAGG TGCTTAATAAATGCTGGATGGATGCAGGAAGGAATGGAGGAATGAATGGG AAGGGAGAACATAGGATCC SV40 Minimal polyA (SEQ ID NO: 411) AATAAAGGAAATTTATTTTCATGCAATAGTGTGTTGGTTTTTTGTGTG WPRE from pSK11 (SEQ ID NO: 412) GGATCC AATCAACCTC TGGATTACAA AATTTGTGAA AGATTGACTG GTATTCTTAA CTATGTTGCT CCTTTTACGC TATGTGGATA CGCTGCTTTA ATGCCTTTGT ATCATGCTAT TGCTTCCCGT ATGGCTTTCA TTTTCTCCTC CTTGTATAAA TCCTGGTTGC TGTCTCTTTA TGAGGAGTTG TGGCCCGTTG TCAGGCAACG TGGCGTGGTG TGCACTGTGT TTGCTGACGC AACCCCCACT GGTTGGGGCA TTGCCACCAC CTGTCAGCTC CTTTCCGGGA CTTTCGCTTT CCCCCTCCCT ATTGCCACGG CGGAACTCAT CGCCGCCTGC CTTGCCCGCT GCTGGACAGG GGCTCGGCTG TTGGGCACTG ACAATTCCGT GGTGTTGTCG GGGAAGCTGA CGTCCTTTCC ATGGCTGCTC GCCTGTGTTG CCACCTGGAT TCTGCGCGGG ACGTCCTTCT GCTACGTCCC TTCGGCCCTC AATCCAGCGG ACCTTCCTTC CCGCGGCCTG CTGCCGGCTC TGCGGCCTCT TCCGCGTCTT CGCCTTCGCC CTCAGACGAG TCGGATCTCC CTTTGGGCCG CCTCCCC WPRE from pSin11 (SEQ ID NO: 413) GAGCAT CTTACCGCCA TTTATTCCCA TATTTGTTCT GTTTTTCTTG ATTTGGGTAT ACATTTAAAT GTTAATAAAA CAAAATGGTG GGGCAATCAT TTACATTTTT AGGGATATGT AATTACTAGT TCAGGTGTAT TGCCACAAGA CAAACATGTT AAGAAACTTT CCCGTTATTT ACGCTCTGTT CCTGTTAATC AACCTCTGGA TTACAAAATT TGTGAAAGAT TGACTGATAT TCTTAACTAT GTTGCTCCTT TTACGCTGTG TGGATATGCT GCTTTATAGC CTCTGTATCT AGCTATTGCT TCCCGTACGG CTTTCGTTTT CTCCTCCTTG TATAAATCCT GGTTGCTGTC TCTTTTAGAG GAGTTGTGGC CCGTTGTCCG TCAACGTGGC GTGGTGTGCT CTGTGTTTGC TGACGCAACC CCCACTGGCT GGGGCATTGC CACCACCTGT CAACTCCTTT CTGGGACTTT CGCTTTCCCC CTCCCGATCG CCACGGCAGA ACTCATCGCC GCCTGCCTTG CCCGCTGCTG GACAGGGGCT AGGTTGCTGG GCACTGATAA TTCCGTGGTG TTGTC

INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

The contents of all cited references (including literature references, patents, patent applications, and websites) that maybe cited throughout this application are hereby expressly incorporated by reference. The practice of the present invention will employ, unless otherwise indicated, conventional techniques of molecular biology, which are well known in the art.

EQUIVALENTS

The invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit or essential characteristics thereof. The foregoing embodiments are therefore to be considered in all respects illustrative rather than limiting of the invention described herein. Scope of the invention is thus indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description, and all changes that come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are therefore intended to be embraced herein. 

The invention claimed is:
 1. An enhanced viral expression vector comprising (i) conserved region B from the rhodopsin gene having the nucleic acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 93, or a variant thereof that can hybridize at stringent hybridization conditions 0.2XSCC, 0.1%SDS, to SEQ ID NO: 93, or that has at least 90% sequence identity with SEQ ID NO: 93, and wherein said variant provides enhanced expression when operatively linked to at least one suppression agent and/or at least one replacement nucleic acid and optionally (ii) at least one of the conserved regions selected from: conserved region C from the rhodopsin gene having the nucleic acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 94, or a variant that can hybridize at stringent hybridization conditions 0.2XSCC, 0.1% SDS, to, or that has at least 90% sequence identity with SEQ ID NO: 94; conserved region F and G from the rhodopsin gene having the nucleic acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 97 or a variant thereof that can hybridize at stringent hybridization conditions 0.2XSCC, 0.1% SDS, to SEQ ID NO: 97, or that has at least 90% sequence identity with, SEQ ID NO: 97; and conserved region A from the rhodopsin gene having the nucleic acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 92 or a variant thereof that can hybridize at stringent hybridization conditions 0.2XSCC, 0.1% SDS to SEQ ID NO: 92, or that has at least 90% sequence identity with SEQ ID NO:
 92. 2. The vector according to claim 1, wherein the vector additionally comprises: (i) conserved region D from the rhodopsin gene having the nucleic acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 95, or variant thereof that can hybridize at stringent hybridization conditions 0.2XSCC, 0.1% SDS, to, or that has at least 90% sequence identity with SEQ ID NO: 95, and/or (ii) at least one of conserved regions H and I from the rhodopsin gene having the nucleic acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NOs: 98 and 99 respectively, or variants thereof that can hybridize at stringent hybridization conditions 0.2XSCC, 0.1% SDS, to, or that has at least 90% sequence identity with SEQ ID NOS: 98 or
 99. 3. The vector according to claim 1, wherein the vector further comprises at least one of each of conserved regions C having the nucleic acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 94, D having the nucleic acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 95, E having the nucleic acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 96, F and G having the nucleic acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 97, H having the nucleic acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 98, I having the nucleic acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 99 and A having the nucleic acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 92, from the rhodopsin gene or variants thereof that can hybridize at stringent hybridization conditions 0.2XSCC, 0.1% SDS, to, or that has at least 90% sequence identity with any one of SEQ ID NOS: 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99 or
 92. 4. The vector according to claim 1, wherein the vector is an AAV vector.
 5. The vector according to claim 1, wherein the vector comprises at least one sequence selected from the group consisting of a stuffer, an insulator, a silencer, an intron sequence, a post translational regulatory element, a transcription factor binding site, and an enhancer.
 6. The vector of claim 5, wherein said sequence(s) is: (i) sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID Nos: 87-89 and 91, or a variant thereof that can hybridize at stringent hybridization conditions 0.2XSCC, 0.1% SDS, to, or that has at least 90% sequence identity with SEQ ID NOS: 87, 88, 89 or 91 respectively; or (ii) sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID Nos: 402-413, or a variant thereof that can hybridize at stringent hybridization conditions 0.2XSCC, 0.1% SDS, to, or that has at least 90% sequence identity with any one of SEQ ID Nos: 402-413.
 7. The vector according to claim 5, wherein the vector comprises at least one transcription factor binding site sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 100-401, or variant thereof that can hybridize at stringent hybridization conditions 0.2XSCC, 0.1% SDS, to, or that has at least 90% sequence identity with any one of SEQ ID Nos: 100-401.
 8. The vector according to claim 1, wherein the vector comprises a chromatin opening element and/or a sequence encoding a neurotrophic or neuroprotective factor.
 9. The vector according to claim 1, wherein the vector comprises at least one suppression agent and/or at least one replacement nucleic acid.
 10. The vector according to claim 1, wherein the replacement nucleic acid encodes a rhodopsin gene.
 11. The vector according to claim 1, wherein said vector comprises at least one suppression agent, wherein said suppression agent comprises: (i) a nucleotide sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID Nos: 75, 77, 79, 81, 83, 85,414, 415,416, 417,418,419,420 and 421, or a variant thereof that can hybridize at stringent hybridization conditions 0.2XSCC, 0.1% SDS, to, or that has at least 90% sequence identity with any one of SEQ ID Nos: 75, 77, 79, 81, 83, 85,414, 415,416, 417,418,419,420 or 421, (ii) a nucleotide sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID Nos: 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25, 27, 29, 31, and 33, or a variant thereof that can hybridize at stringent hybridization conditions 0.2XSCC, 0.1% SDS, to, or that has at least 90% sequence identity with any one of SEQ ID Nos: 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25, 27, 29, 31, or 33; or (iii) a nucleotide sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID Nos: 35-67, or variant thereof that can hybridize at stringent hybridization conditions 0.2XSCC, 0.1% SDS, to, or that has at least 90% sequence identity with any one of SEQ ID Nos: 35-67.
 12. The vector according to claim 1, wherein said vector comprises at least one replacement nucleic acid, wherein said replacement nucleic acid comprises: (i) a nucleotide sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID Nos: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, and 68, or variant thereof that can hybridize at stringent hybridization conditions 0.2XSCC, 0.1% SDS, to, or that has at least 90% sequence identity with any one of SEQ ID Nos: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, and 68; or (ii) a nucleotide sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID Nos: 76, 78, 80, 82, 84, and 86, or variant thereof that can hybridize at stringent hybridization conditions 0.2XSCC, 0.1% SDS, to, or that has at least 90% sequence identity with any one of SEQ ID Nos: 76, 78, 80, 82, 84, and
 86. 13. The vector according to claim 11, wherein said vector comprises at least one replacement nucleic acid, wherein said replacement nucleic acid comprises: (i) a nucleotide sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID Nos: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, and 68, or variant thereof that can hybridize at stringent hybridization conditions 0.2XSCC, 0.1% SDS, to, or that has at least 90% sequence identity with any one of SEQ ID Nos: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, and 68 respectively; or (ii) a nucleotide sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID Nos: 76, 78, 80, 82, 84, and 86, or variant thereof that can hybridize at stringent hybridization 0.2XSCC, 0.1% SDS, to, or that has at least 90% sequence identity with any one of SEQ ID Nos: 76, 78, 80, 82, 84, and
 86. 14. A therapeutic composition comprising at least one vector according to claim 1 and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.
 15. An isolated cell comprising the vector of claim
 1. 16. A method of suppressing the expression of a mutant gene and replacing expression of the mutant gene with a replacement nucleic acid, the method comprising the steps of administering to a mammal the therapeutic composition of claim
 14. 17. A kit comprising (i) the vector according to claim 11 and (ii) a vector comprising at least one replacement nucleic acid, wherein said replacement nucleic acid comprises: (i) a nucleotide sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, and 68, or variant thereof that can hybridize at stringent hybridization conditions 0.2XSCC, 0.1% SDS, to, or that has at least 90% sequence identity with any one of SEQ ID NOs: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, and 68; or (ii) a nucleotide sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 76, 78, 80, 82, 84, and 86, or variant thereof that can hybridize at stringent hybridization conditions 0.2XSCC, 0.1% SDS, to, or that has at least 90% sequence identity with any one of SEQ ID NOs: 76, 78, 80, 82, 84, and
 86. 18. A kit comprising (i) the vector according to claim 12 and (ii) a vector comprising at least one suppression agent, wherein said suppression agent comprises: (i) a nucleotide sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 75, 77, 79, 81, 83, 85,414, 415,416, 417,418,419,420 and 421, or a variant thereof that can hybridize at stringent hybridization conditions 0.2XSCC, 0.1% SDS, to, or that has at least 90% sequence identity with any one of SEQ ID NOs: 75, 77, 79, 81, 83, 85,414, 415,416, 417,418,419,420 or 421; (ii) a nucleotide sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25, 27, 29, 31, and 33, or variant thereof that can hybridize at stringent hybridization conditions 0.2XSCC, 0.1% SDS, to, or that has at least 90% sequence identity with any one of SEQ ID NOs: 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25, 27, 29, 31, or 33; or (iii) a nucleotide sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 35-67, or variant thereof that can hybridize at stringent hybridization conditions 0.2XSCC, 0.1% SDS, to, or that has at least 90% sequence identity with any one of SEQ ID NOs: 35-67.
 19. A kit comprising (i) the vector according to claim 11 and (ii) the vector according to claim
 15. 20. The vector according to claim 1, wherein the vector comprises each of conserved regions B and C from the rhodopsin gene having the nucleic acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NOs: 93 and 94, or variants thereof that can hybridize at stringent hybridization 0.2XSCC, 0.1% SDS, to, or that has at least 90% sequence identity with SEQ ID NOs: 93 and 94 respectively.
 21. The vector according to claim 1, wherein the vector comprises: (i) at least one of each of conserved regions B, C, D, F and G from the rhodopsin gene having the nucleic acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NOs: 93, 94, 95, and 97, or variants thereof that can hybridize at stringent hybridization conditions 0.2XSCC, 0.1% SDS, to, or that has at least 90% sequence identity with SEQ ID NOs: 93, 94, 95, and 97 respectively; (ii) the nucleic acid sequence having the nucleic acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 411, or a variant thereof that can hybridize at stringent hybridization conditions 0.2XSCC, 0.1% SDS, to, or that has at least 90% sequence identity with SEQ ID NO: 411; (iii) the enhancer having the nucleic acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 91, or a variant thereof that can hybridize at stringent hybridization conditions 0.2XSCC, 0.1% SDS, to, or that- has at least 90% sequence identity with SEQ ID NO: 91; and (iv) replacement nucleic acid having the nucleic acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 76, or a variant thereof that can hybridize at stringent hybridization conditions 0.2XSCC, 0.1% SDS, to, or that has at least 90% sequence identity with SEQ ID NO:
 76. 22. A kit comprising (i) the vector according to claim 21 and (ii) a vector comprising a suppression agent comprising a nucleotide sequence having the nucleic acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 75, or a variant thereof that can hybridize at stringent hybridization conditions 0.2XSCC, 0.1% SDS, to, or that has at least 90% sequence identity with SEQ ID NO:
 75. 23. A therapeutic composition comprising (i) the vector according to claim 11 and (ii) a vector comprising at least one replacement nucleic acid, wherein said replacement nucleic acid comprises: (i) a nucleotide sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, and 68, or variant thereof that can hybridize at stringent hybridization conditions 0.2XSCC, 0.1% SDS, to, or that has at least 90% sequence identity with any one of SEQ ID NOs: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, and 68; or (ii) a nucleotide sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 76, 78, 80, 82, 84, and 86, or variant thereof that can hybridize at stringent hybridization conditions 0.2XSCC, 0.1% SDS, to, or that has at least 90% sequence identity with, any one of SEQ ID NOs: 76, 78, 80, 82, 84, and 86 and, (iii) a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.
 24. A therapeutic composition comprising (i) the vector according to claim 12 and (ii) a vector comprising at least one suppression agent, wherein said suppression agent comprises: (i) a nucleotide sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 75, 77, 79, 81, 83, 85,414, 415,416, 417,418,419,420 and 421, or a variant thereof that can hybridize at stringent hybridization conditions 0.2XSCC, 0.1% SDS, to, or that has at least 90% sequence identity with any one of SEQ ID NOs: 75, 77, 79, 81, 83, 85,414, 415,416, 417,418,419,420 or 421; (ii) a nucleotide sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25, 27, 29, 31, and 33, or variant thereof that can hybridize at stringent hybridization conditions 0.2XSCC, 0.1% SDS, to, or that has at least 90% sequence identity with, any one of SEQ ID NOs: 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25, 27, 29, 31, or 33; or (iii) a nucleotide sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 35-67, or variant thereof that can hybridize at stringent hybridization conditions 0.2XSCC, 0.1% SDS, to, or that has at least 90% sequence identity with, any one of SEQ ID NOs: 35-67 and, (iii) a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.
 25. A therapeutic composition comprising (i) the vector according to claim 11, (ii) the vector according to claim 15 and (iii) a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. 